All user reviews for the Seymour Duncan SH-2N Jazz Model Neck

After trying a BC Rich Bich with SH2 and SH4, I'm tempted on my Gibson Flying V was equipped with Classic 57 in neck and formerly of SH1
Already the sound is round is present it does not sound hollow there is the presence of micro fills out the empty sound, it is a real surprise we feel we no longer holds the same guitar in hand, compared SH1 at least it sounds cold and less right ... and compared to the Classic 57's is more open sounds less boxy ... So there it is good for me on the changes on this guitar for a while, the marriage with the Flying V is perfect, it was the last change before reselling it so I could not find the alchemy sound on my vintage gear, the reputation of this microphones well worth everything told above is not overrated and after the test is not a legend, so for the fans

J've installed this on my Yamaha micro Aes620 in neck, with a push-pull tone of the splitter and the Seymour Duncan SH4 JB in the bridge model ....

very good micro, slamming both sonoritées a harmonious and well split the neck position!

without the splitter is evolved a more aggressive round and especially aggressive in saturation, the top of a metal lead well, especially harmonics from ..
in short, forcing a jazzy side, with excellent attack and look fine round lightly loaded low frequency, ideally placed for my solo!

In bridge with sh4, all split, we already feel a big sound s install air punchy and provocative! my favorite porn position on saturated rhythm and chopped ...
bridge in non-split, and already heavier round, ideal position for good and big choruses that fart who nodded ....

prices quite correct, € 80 in my case ...
and yes, I c is my ideal companion to the metal, c is not the same thing that in a emg81 but I was tired of hearing, metal = emg85/emg81 for me too precise and clean that we forget the very principle of a distortion
That said, very good couple with sh4 ....
I would do without hesitation that choice, of course ...
I think a test of other mics with this one verse, including a SD distortion!
10/10 no complaints, it does the job that I asked him to perfection ...

I have this mic a great Les Paul copy Sandard (Burny) in the neck position, without cover, and it shows a standard prsence highs, a lot of bass but nothing more. In his clear, it's too clean for me and a lack of body. It plays jazz arrangements, but the great delicacy and great precision is not enough to mask the lack of heat and spice I love all of the same chorus heard in jazz. I put on a Epiphone Les Paul Custom that sounds right to move freely even less to 2 times more expensive, and as the ear is less rich and Dfine, we have a sound is more neutral, less typ. Ca ca dpanne and catches up some of the default of the guitar. It's a good point! In saturation, however it is not bad at all, but there is no good crunch. So niet for the blues, a bad fall, that's what I loved in my heart. I switched to a classic 57 gibson APRS trying an SD 59 neck better suited my taste. It's still a good trs microphone, especially in live as well acute prcis going well in the mix but we play clean, arpges, jazz arrangements, or saturated! like what ... NB, with time and a change of knobs, handle the microphone on the epi LP custom strings and jazz mesh dish is really not bad at all for playing jazz ... and split, gave her an almost sound (see review above) trs cool. Micro trs end and centered on AIGS.

I finally put this microphone in combination with an epiphone SG SH4 a well made a good ten years ... It's great, everything passes, even with the split but still rocks like a guitar blues.Il be 100% mahogany, and is trs trs well. if a table stocky, the sound will be harder and too focused on the treble. Obviously we are talking good violin.
But what have I put on my epi custom jazz? leosound of classic '57 ... a killing.

I mounted the microphone in the neck position on a PRS Santana SE.
Two goals:
Add-dynamics and a clear attack missing the microphone before it, but while keeping the heat of the PAF.
-Possibility to split.
Mission accomplished.
Position non splitee, the heat of PAF is well guarded, the attack on the microphone is good and can be according to the tone control edge. We get in this position distortions warm and clear, never bouzeuses. In his clear, we have a very jazzy sound defined on all strings (even the bass) and warm.
Splitee position was crystal clear, very nice and hot. It looks like sometimes even with the setting has an acoustic sound.

Finally, a micro excellent in all positions and very versatile.
A reference site for many people and truly justified.

I use it for two weeks, it is mounted on my les paul studio with bridge in the screamin 'deamon george lynch (with the possibility to split the two, which is nice).

Jazz? Did you say jazz? Naaan, not at all agree! On the site, they also offset by saying "good for country, blues, etc. ."... Again, I disagree that level. It has a clean sound that sounds pretty acoustic guitar, it's cool for trs rhythmic distortion while in well, has a neck rest, but with much more acute than most microphones serious. Also, it fits perfectly with the screamin 'deamon and two give it their time hovering trs and yet so rock I love so much.

But do not be fooled by the name, srieusement.

Report trs trs good quality price (90 euros, it is not death), I use it only rarely and even more rarely splitter. Trs effective, its all been smooth and graceful.

I recommend all lovers of clean sounds typical cure, enzovoort.

Repeat this choice? A background!

- How long have you use it?
It is a replacement of my 496R explore and is coupled to 500t. It is in place for 2 weeks

- What is the particular feature you like most?
Indniablement its versatility. Excellent clean sound, I find the tones are well balanced TRS (on a mahogany body). Neither too dry nor too dull, just enough roundness. Once Splitt has become quite slamming inintressant and not at all.
In dpart, I feared a big diffrence in output level between the micro "jazz" and 500t, which is the micro patator Gibson (magnet raisin bread). Well it is not! The aquilibre trs is good I find between the two, my enjoyable surprise.
At saturation, the cash trs well, but ...

- What is the particular feature you like least?
... A bit rough in rhythmic

- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
On this skyscraper in the neck position: 496R, EMGs 60, 81, 85. Of these four microphones, only 81 given me some prs satisfation, but not enough Dfine plain

- How do you report qualitprix?.
Pay 60 new, excellent, RAS

- With the exprience, you do again this choice?
No problem, at least with a eexplorer (mahogany body so) on which it marries well with the trs 500t home

Fresh mountain this morning on my Ibanez SZ32O MH (all mahogany). I dj chang the HB103 (bridge) for an original SH4 JB and s'tait rvl fee. Ms. SH2N record for taking the place of HB101 (I used it because it happened not in the mix). I saw that I could compare two SZ320MH and frankly we gain clarity nettetsauf can be saturated in rhythm, which did not seem to be the radius of the micro . on the other hand to everything soloing ... Wow! If I had known I would have bought the couple live SH2/SH4 which is cheaper ... I renew the opration ds as possible on my second SZ320, dj team SH4 in a bridge. Oh also, I deleted the "split" story to have a more dense position intermdiare. Recommend any scratches on "midrange" of violin making dcente but the pickups are the weak link.

For four years I use the SH2N on a semi-hollow Ibanez shape and size similar to a Lespaul (see notice AXD82P). J'apprcie normment the versatility he brings the characters and post it notes and gives it all its particulirement clear. The spectral balance is good trs. When he gives a split characters trs strata which makes his formidable funk rhythm. It supports TRS for a good overdrive rle lead but its limit is in rhythmic crunch o it tends drooling ... not that I ESG gure. This is the perfect tool to use Blues, Funk, Soul, Jazz, Rock ... and more.
SH1N with it my preferences in terms of neck pickup Seymour Duncan Humbucker in.
It is coupled with SH4 and gives all the sonic palette that I use.
on the other hand for having a test on guitar Alder there long ago, I strongly deprecated in this case, it is not adapted all violin while SH1N seems better partner various types of stringed instruments.
The application itself SH2N of the solid-mahogany body, itself a case of reasonable or it will sound too dry.
The report price is good quality but the competition is certainly very tough.
But for the unique personality of this microphone, I probably do it again this election.