View other reviews for this product:
anghisha
Published on 04/18/08 at 17:37
- 2 Audiophile 24/96 bought to connect 2 machine with VSTLink of Cubase, one of the machines possde Delta66 a dj (dj used the SPDIF 66)
Machine 1: Quad Core Q6600 CPU 3.6GHz Overclock, CM Gigabyte GA-P35C-DS3R, 4GB of RAM, Windows XP 32 bits, and a Delta 66 installbr dj /> Machine 2: AMD Opteron 165 Overclock 2.6Ghz, CM UT4 DFI LanParty Ultra, 2GB ram, Windows Vista 32bit
CHARACTERISTICS of the 24/96 compltent perfectly my Delta66 by adding back a MIDI connection, an input / output on RCA, and a 2nd input / output numrique.
UTILIZATION
Installation trouble-free, map IMMEDIATE recognized by Windows XP as I had given a dj and Delta66 are the same drivers
Trouble-free installation on the 2nd machine running Vista with the latest drivers available
Note: I use the latest driver before on XP because I do not like the ergonomics of the new panel CONTRL the latest drivers.
BMOL one: they could have put the two colors diffrent SPDIF taken as they did for the RCA, not easy derrire the PC to see what is the IN or OUT
GETTING STARTED
- See above is stable farpaitement! Except that I did not look at the new panel config.
- It took almost 1 year for Vista drivers, ca MRIT few points off the note, but today it's the pass they are and they work well.
I use Cubase Studio 4 on my main machine, and I alternate Cubase LE or an old V-Stack on the 2nd.
Latency with the 24/96 level that works in parallel my Delta66 (seen as one card by Cubase), it does not move around in 3ms 88.2khz/24 rgl on a buffer 256, no crack observation using
Same performance on my 2nd machine
OVERALL OPINION
It's been two weeks that I use the 24/96, and it's 2an I have the Delta 66, Audiophile this seems to have the same quality as 66 in advance so I expect to have no problem me.
I cry that opinion because there are few more for use with the card diffrent SERIES Delta in the same machine and it works perfectly well, it adds no latency or anything , you just get used to juggle between the two a little card in the control panel of M-Audio.
And it's also an easy way to use the VSTLink, always handy when you have a 2nd machine known what to do
And yes I would do this choice.
Machine 1: Quad Core Q6600 CPU 3.6GHz Overclock, CM Gigabyte GA-P35C-DS3R, 4GB of RAM, Windows XP 32 bits, and a Delta 66 installbr dj /> Machine 2: AMD Opteron 165 Overclock 2.6Ghz, CM UT4 DFI LanParty Ultra, 2GB ram, Windows Vista 32bit
CHARACTERISTICS of the 24/96 compltent perfectly my Delta66 by adding back a MIDI connection, an input / output on RCA, and a 2nd input / output numrique.
UTILIZATION
Installation trouble-free, map IMMEDIATE recognized by Windows XP as I had given a dj and Delta66 are the same drivers
Trouble-free installation on the 2nd machine running Vista with the latest drivers available
Note: I use the latest driver before on XP because I do not like the ergonomics of the new panel CONTRL the latest drivers.
BMOL one: they could have put the two colors diffrent SPDIF taken as they did for the RCA, not easy derrire the PC to see what is the IN or OUT
GETTING STARTED
- See above is stable farpaitement! Except that I did not look at the new panel config.
- It took almost 1 year for Vista drivers, ca MRIT few points off the note, but today it's the pass they are and they work well.
I use Cubase Studio 4 on my main machine, and I alternate Cubase LE or an old V-Stack on the 2nd.
Latency with the 24/96 level that works in parallel my Delta66 (seen as one card by Cubase), it does not move around in 3ms 88.2khz/24 rgl on a buffer 256, no crack observation using
Same performance on my 2nd machine
OVERALL OPINION
It's been two weeks that I use the 24/96, and it's 2an I have the Delta 66, Audiophile this seems to have the same quality as 66 in advance so I expect to have no problem me.
I cry that opinion because there are few more for use with the card diffrent SERIES Delta in the same machine and it works perfectly well, it adds no latency or anything , you just get used to juggle between the two a little card in the control panel of M-Audio.
And it's also an easy way to use the VSTLink, always handy when you have a 2nd machine known what to do
And yes I would do this choice.