Mine is 98 and date of completion "custom" gray mtalise.
For the rest it is a usual Roxanne.
The 2 pickups and split potentially offer a wide range, the handle is nice and the finish is not bad at all, except at a few knobs that tire.
It draws clear to Gibson Les Paul.

EDIT: Since the passage from the luthier, everything is greased and oiled works wonders.

UTILIZATION

A thin neck easy, the fact that it makes al CASC to acute ais.
The ergonomics are very good, the guitar is dcoupe and pluttlgre.
We obtain easily a cool sound.

SOUNDS

Sound approaching a Les Paul. I say approaching because a remains much more "light". Less fat, less pais, DIFFERENT anything. But very Rock.
Sounds with microphones split ... I read here and that is "typical Fender" ...
It's really to give a vague idea. Both are approaching a little humbucker Gibson, both singles are very, very far away but then, a stratum or a tele.
That said the sound palette is broad.
EDIT: The further since the transition from the luthier, sound is heavily reinforced.
It sends duplicate.
The rest of my splittage feel pretty anecdotal.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a year prs.
I like its look and its dual microphones, mics I like less "simple".
I had a classic telecaster U.S. before, and it is generally in the same range of guitar, probably a bit above.
I now also a Telecaster Custom Shop, and it's another world.
Lag time to time I use the microphone for his double, but the handle is a bit too late for me (the usual round of C "beefy" from the TV).

Quality price ratio?
1200 today. It is also the price of a Fender U.S. (in France) or certain Gibson, and is a quality comparable, may be even with a slight advantage to Lag.
To summarize, it is a versatile guitar sounds but with a quality and usefulness of a very variable.