Cort Stature 115

The version I have always "made in Korea" possde black varnish finish and translucent plate micro style "metallic gray marble" the most beautiful effect as the version "strategic fender deluxe" Payroll 1600 francs
vibrato on a knife wilkinson style that can be pushed or shot like a floyd: very practical

UTILIZATION

The neck is quite thin and the coating has done well t trs, trs enjoyable
The key is nice. only minor complaint that I could handle it at the frttes that are too thin (22), it would have to have t prfrable medium jumbo, but good for the price ...
t have a thin heel nice because it is the same as a fender, Access in acute is difficult.

SOUNDS

My guitar has t "customize" with 2 EMG 81 splitables double and a single 85, I also mcaniques Sperzel addition: it is hardly even dsaccorde bends with r ptition. (The oil bath mcaniques taient trs good home.)
2200 francs plus cot
She goes silent micro home with two singles and a double splitable, these microphones lacked DEFINITIONS. the silent dfonce dj prvue to accommodate two doubles.

OVERALL OPINION

Résumé for a bit this guitar is very well done, more than a squier lments of quality in the same price range. the pickups lacked DEFINITIONS. but everything else is of good quality
trs good guitar for beginners
my version, I do not intend to change or sell
she is playing in all styles (metal, funk, blues ...)

Made in core
2 simple
1 double splitable
2 tone
1 volume
wilkinson vibrato type
neck and maple body
rosewood fingerboard
22 frets

UTILIZATION

The handle is his strong point I think. extremely well done, as the set of violin making. nut and guide rope on roulette, precise mechanics. small flat, I find the frets very bad quality.
sound? it's beautiful and good for its price range. electronics is being treated. is not heavier than a true Mexican Start. the acoustillage is, as the frets, poor quality

SOUNDS

In a word: versatility!
the microphones are of good quality simple and do what they do and has a pretty nice way. can be said of her boyfriend humbucker? well NO. the poor is a bit of a gentleman to pick up heavy saturation. it's not mediocre, it's more than adequate even for this price range. But it has not, without wanting to blame. he does what he can povre! splitage of the humbucker to say, little usefulness. signal loss is considerable!

OVERALL OPINION

If, like me, you scratch like a handle, the handle will help you.
I find it endearing that guitar. she always wanted to give the best of itself.
close to a great technical guitar playing on a 67 les paul 4000, found it extraordinary. not by its sound but for its comfort (you will say, when playing on paul ....) and accuracy.
qualitprix excellent report
I would do this choice if your eyes closed cort change the frets and acoustillage mdiocre. ft. I think it is still manufactured.
I aimeuuuuuu! but I need a new handle (requires shrink shit)

See review below.
Everything is very correct, so for the price, and only for the saddle, it is a very good note

UTILIZATION

The neck is super fun to play, it glides on its own. Well, I'm not a Schreder either.
Access to acute ... bin as a stratum, neither better nor worse due to heel quite large.
I do not find it too heavy compared to my LP Standard C77. A good belt anyway and the weight is forgotten. The overall ergonomics, like a Start is very good.
This guitar provides great playing comfort, both sitting and standing.
If you get a good sound? Ben must be nuanced. It is a guitar that can be considered entry level. So we can say yes, and even better than that compared to the same competitive price. flat for HB knobs and not very progressive. Perhaps this is due to his age (22 years!) But the volume knob is not far from the on / off function. Tones not very progressive either.
Anyway, once again: for the price ...

SOUNDS

She suited me, rather I should say 22 years ago and until a few years back: well! I have never used a big satus.
The single is simply amazing for the price, really good. Its a very typical Start (it's stupid to say but hey, it does so well)
HB, not bad, is still a tone below. Forget, however, the splitter is the thing we try when we receive it and forget very quickly that it can do it!

For cons, gives all the versatility. Everything can be addressed, perhaps through to the bulk metal.
I prefer to use sounds simple ... for now!
9 because the HB is a notch below the simple.

OVERALL OPINION

So I bought in 1987 and has made my happiness very long.
What I like his versatility and in hindsight ... longevity!
I still remember the article in "Musician" (Does it still exist?) Which said that for its price (2500 francs at the time) it offered much more than most shovels were worth the double. Do not know much, I bought your eyes closed.
I recently was looking for other sounds (plus P77 LP and TV) but frankly, this surprises me scratching. She has not moved, the handle is nickel finish excellent. I changed by Mecas cons, one had dropped.
I think I'll give it a facelift. I ran a HB C77 above but I will rewire and change the knobs.
It is beautifully agreement, even abuse of the vibrato.
In short, if you are looking for a cheap strat OCCAZ is a great choice that will bring you much better than many guitars that are now worth up to 400 € in New ... if not more! To the extent that it has not budged a bit in 20 years, there is little chance that it moves a lot the next 20 years. The rating is based on the price when I bought it and its rating today.