View other reviews for this product:
0MrFender0 « Great guitar for its price »
Published on 04/27/13 at 15:26two humbuckers "Rockfield" splittable, 3 positions: one, the other two
a volume knob, a Tone button
UTILIZATION
nice run, very short compared to a fender, not amazing ergonomics: guitar a bit heavy and takes a little over the left shoulder, access to acute is the main defect of this guitar: it is not impossible, just complicated compared to a fender, not maize finish (I did not much comparison tool So basically I do not know)
Its super and ultra versatile!
SOUNDS
I do a lot of rock / blues and micro side handle me frankly bend, especially in the treble. occasionally a little fuck or reggae is well come, or solo a little more "spice" in a rock and micro side bridge is ideally suited ... I still do not operate much the possibility of splitt but it happens
(Remember to give a little gain if splitt one of the microphones) if not super hot to PRS's actually on the humbucker at the neck will be downright chopper sounds that come from the throat, very deep (no bad puns) when the pickup lens and it will be rather dry (with punch!) split it is rather mild and relatively clear
I use the effect "UK Blues" with blind Reverb pedal on my Vox Tonelab LE, I use an amp lamps.
OVERALL OPINION
I been using almost half a year, I had a front fender (Lonestar) which ennervait me: I wanted a sound that had more balls and that's what I like about my MK The quality / price / versatility is huge! it's cheap (although hurry, it's fureure the other side of the sleeve and prices begin to rise here) and frankly the balls when needed without being nag (and know s' delete if necessary, or even be very soft, you have to play on the microphones) the handle is short allowing some ease on stage (in addition she takes good light, beautiful finish)
In short a guitar that I bought her for her (ha. .. ha ... ha) and finish and proved super comfortable, it sounds great in all styles (a tube amp) and is not expensive ... that you ask.
unless I win the Lotto by then, I would do this choice with his eyes closed!
a volume knob, a Tone button
UTILIZATION
nice run, very short compared to a fender, not amazing ergonomics: guitar a bit heavy and takes a little over the left shoulder, access to acute is the main defect of this guitar: it is not impossible, just complicated compared to a fender, not maize finish (I did not much comparison tool So basically I do not know)
Its super and ultra versatile!
SOUNDS
I do a lot of rock / blues and micro side handle me frankly bend, especially in the treble. occasionally a little fuck or reggae is well come, or solo a little more "spice" in a rock and micro side bridge is ideally suited ... I still do not operate much the possibility of splitt but it happens
(Remember to give a little gain if splitt one of the microphones) if not super hot to PRS's actually on the humbucker at the neck will be downright chopper sounds that come from the throat, very deep (no bad puns) when the pickup lens and it will be rather dry (with punch!) split it is rather mild and relatively clear
I use the effect "UK Blues" with blind Reverb pedal on my Vox Tonelab LE, I use an amp lamps.
OVERALL OPINION
I been using almost half a year, I had a front fender (Lonestar) which ennervait me: I wanted a sound that had more balls and that's what I like about my MK The quality / price / versatility is huge! it's cheap (although hurry, it's fureure the other side of the sleeve and prices begin to rise here) and frankly the balls when needed without being nag (and know s' delete if necessary, or even be very soft, you have to play on the microphones) the handle is short allowing some ease on stage (in addition she takes good light, beautiful finish)
In short a guitar that I bought her for her (ha. .. ha ... ha) and finish and proved super comfortable, it sounds great in all styles (a tube amp) and is not expensive ... that you ask.
unless I win the Lotto by then, I would do this choice with his eyes closed!