Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Furch OM32-SM reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Furch OM32-SM
Images
1/48
Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
sixfir sixfir

«  Superb »

Published on 12/28/13 at 17:07
Table antiqued solid spruce top, back and sides solid mahogany, rosewood fingerboard and bridge, OM format 14 cases non-cash.

UTILIZATION

The neck is thin in width but somewhat thick, V-type I think also it's still a very comfortable guitar

SOUNDS

I tested side by side the furch OM 32 OM SM and SR 35 with rosewood back and sides, 32-SM seemed clearly more balanced with great relief, low beautiful and low mids, treble and warm mids, providing a presence missing in my view the rosewood version, this last can be wonderfully suitable to strumming, but at least lead or fingerpicking, by this characteristic deflation in the midrange, and treble less present and warm. SM 32 sounds really fabulous, rich and woody, warm, but balanced with a lot of relief and depth, I do have only a short time, but to be compared to a lot of models in size OM, Martin, Maton, Taylor, it is clear that the quality is definitely waiting for you for a reasonable price. I also tried some Furch with cedar top, which I did for once not terribly excited. Yet I find it perfectly versatile, whether strumming, fingerpicking or lead.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a short time, I tried Maton, Martin, Taylor, Lakewood, Furch etc. I particularly like his sound and relatively sober look, I would do without hesitation that choice, the finish is perfect, the Only downside for me is the slightly V-shaped neck profile which I've never really understood the interest, but hey you get used quickly.