ddn « My first sound card, I still have! »
Published on 08/13/11 at 09:04cf. lower
UTILIZATION
cf. lower
GETTING STARTED
cf. lower
OVERALL OPINION
Let simple: for the price of opportunity, if you have a PC that runs XP, look no further this is the best Q / P and far away. Very stable, with a real MIDI interface (it runs a modular north without problem), enough inputs, etc..
The preamps are just adequate is the main drawback of the card, besides the fact that it has the drivers on XP and is very stable to SP 2. Ah, yes, it records with no latency and stable under 48khz / 24 bit, which I recall was the standard studio pros in the early 2000 - still not bad, obviously it is better now.
Newfoundland was the time when I bought what was best in its price range. I have 8 years I use it every day in Cubase and I basically have never regretted my purchase.
For 80 balls, used like 200 bullets and the config screen and complete with the bike There's really no better!
UTILIZATION
cf. lower
GETTING STARTED
cf. lower
OVERALL OPINION
Let simple: for the price of opportunity, if you have a PC that runs XP, look no further this is the best Q / P and far away. Very stable, with a real MIDI interface (it runs a modular north without problem), enough inputs, etc..
The preamps are just adequate is the main drawback of the card, besides the fact that it has the drivers on XP and is very stable to SP 2. Ah, yes, it records with no latency and stable under 48khz / 24 bit, which I recall was the standard studio pros in the early 2000 - still not bad, obviously it is better now.
Newfoundland was the time when I bought what was best in its price range. I have 8 years I use it every day in Cubase and I basically have never regretted my purchase.
For 80 balls, used like 200 bullets and the config screen and complete with the bike There's really no better!