Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Nagra ARES C
Images
1/33

All user reviews for the Nagra ARES C

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
2.5/5
(1 reviews)
100 %
(1 review)
Write a user review
Users reviews
  • Redhat 6Redhat 6

    Nagra ARES CPublished on 11/21/06 at 14:46
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Personally I find that completely missed Nagra its entry into the digital age:
    The preamps have nothing to do with the quality of a preamp E or IV-S, it is well dessous.Le file format specific to Nagra is not even a format recognized by Windows Linux or FAT type, so that the USB is almost unusable.
    I've never seen a tool as badly managed digital transmission: can not record sound in mpeg and send it via ISDN, the ARES C does not know in real time to convert G722 audio = When you want send a digitally on a G722 codec should save it in phone G722 and G711!
    It's really anything.
    In short, unreliable, not functional, as I like to Nagra's analog product, as I flee what they do in digital.
    Read more
    Personally I find that completely missed Nagra its entry into the digital age:
    The preamps have nothing to do with the quality of a preamp E or IV-S, it is well dessous.Le file format specific to Nagra is not even a format recognized by Windows Linux or FAT type, so that the USB is almost unusable.
    I've never seen a tool as badly managed digital transmission: can not record sound in mpeg and send it via ISDN, the ARES C does not know in real time to convert G722 audio = When you want send a digitally on a G722 codec should save it in phone G722 and G711!
    It's really anything.
    In short, unreliable, not functional, as I like to Nagra's analog product, as I flee what they do in digital.
    See less