All user reviews for the Zoom H2n
|7 reviews||50 %|
|5 reviews||36 %|
|1 user review||7 %|
Zoom H2n Mini-Review - Mid/Side Story
The replacement for the good old Zoom H2! With the H2n, Zoom aims to offer a major upgrade of the most famous pocket recorder.
vsavagellc's review"Not to shabby, could be better "
Before purchasing this H2n or the original version I had tried a few different ones from Tascam as wells Zoom's H4n (another good field recorder). In my opinion the H2n sounds pretty clean, there is a little noise in it, but you can't avoid that will lower end recorders.
I think it's priced reasonably fair for the quality you get from the mics on board.
I wish it had a regular field recorder's look rather than that of a condenser mic, but that's just personal perference.
If I were to start out fresh, looking for a good priced all purpose mic:
Field recording (amb sounds)
voice overs (basic)
I may go with the H2n, it has some great features, the mics sound really good, simple to use and the build quality is a tad bit better than the H1N Zoom (both are units have plastic builds)
If you're planning on doing any outside field recording I would strongly suggest purchasing a fury head. This is very similar to a wind screen or wind cutter. They look very similar to the hair found on the old school troll toys.
This is going to cut a lot of the wind you run into thus giving you better quality sound.
I'd also experiment with recording the same sound with the each mic option this way you can really control the dynamics of the sound once you're in post. This one main advantage the H2n has over most of the other portable recorders out there.
I gave this record a 6 overall because for the price it should include XLR input like many of the other recorders in it's price range.
All in all it's not bad for the money
Ps be careful of unit noise, make sure all recorded sounds are above the floor noise for best possible recordings
1 people found this review helpful
For the price vs. value, I would say that it is just right. You get exactly what you pay for with this item, perhaps even a bit more.
The sound quality of the H2n is quite good when compared against many other handheld, condenser mic equiped models offered by Zooms' competitors. The mics Zoom uses are very well balanced and very sensitive and of overall very good quality. I've used this in a variety of "live" situations from very quiet shows to ampitheatre shows to indoor rock shows. The H2n always performs well provided that you take the time to familiarize yoursef with the onboard effects and ensure that you are not clipping. Personally, I would not recomend using any of the built in limiters or compressers etc. If you have a good DAW to transfer the recorded files into then your best bet is to just record it dry and do your eq'ing/mastering later with your good monitors and in a controlled environment. Also keep in mind that the H2n's condenser mics are very sensitive to handling noise and or vibration noise from being set on a hard surface. You can easily ruin a recording of a great live show by setting it on a wooden railing without some sort of padding or something underneath, the optional stand is nice. Also, keep in mind how much internal storage space you have, the options of choosing between different sampling rates and or bit depths is fantastic, but you can use that space up quicker than you may expect if you insist on recording at the highest quality. On a lower note, the proprietary file system is a bit odd, once you get used to it it's no big deal but you'll see what I mean.
I've used a ton of handheld recording devices over the years from microcassette all the way to fully digital and I have to assure you that the H2n is a godsend for the applications that it is best suited for. I would certainly purchase the H2n again if necessary or another model from Zoom. I've used all of their H series recorders and have gotten consistently good results.
stompboxjon's review"a must have item"
The pickup patter of the H2n is made to handle any type of recording situation you might have. I have even recorded instruments with it live and then used that to dump into my DAW to master the sound of what I have recorded. All musicians and artist need to have a recorder handy like how a photographer always has a camera on him. You just never know when you might need your H2n.
One of the great features of the H2n is a recovery mode, just in case you lose power you can still recover what you where recording on the H2n. You can get up to 50 hours of recording time because it can take up to a 32GB SD card. Then you can just plug the H2n up to your computer via USB and get all of your audio recordings right off of it in no time to your computer. You can use it with any computer that has a USB 2.0 input slot and with any system. There are no installations involved when using the H2n. It is plug and play.
SonicPulverizer's review"Great quality."
Going through the LCD User interface can be a pain at times. The controls of the H2n are not completely intuitive and you can find yourself accidentally recording over or deleting items. Besides these habitual quirks, the learning curve to this product is not steep by any means. I was able to get the device unboxed, setup, and a decent sounding take recorded in less than 20 minutes.
The microphones do a great job of isolating the source material in a residential apartment. Even with electrical noise from appliances and traffic spilling in from outside, the recordings always sounded very intimate-- rejecting most of these unwanted sounds. Acoustic guitars sound very full and when tracking multiple sources together (such as voice and guitar as well as multiple voices) , they keep distinct and separated in the recording.
The Zoom H2n exceeded my expectations for sound quality and made me feel very comfortable with the purchase. If you ever need an affordable device for capturing audio, give the Zoom line a try.
EthanVanGuard's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I tried templates for all types of media: tape, files, mini-disc ....
The quality of this one is really good: all sounds are clear, it is recognized particularly well recorded music instruments (compared with those for which all sounds like ...) and no noise. In addition I use the configuration "concert" with which I record concerts on stage WITHOUT CA SATURATED! Only "downside" you just add 3 decibels lower on Audacity when recording vacuum. To all the circumstances of recording, his first attack must also be reduced, but it is something reversible, so a problem circumvented.
When recording goes digital only in the case of electronic or compressed music, recording is done without compression (advantage or disadvantage? This is relative).
A note also of course a wide range of configurations. Wav and. Mp3 for my part I record maximum. Wav to mp3 and public performance 320 or 128 for private performance.
Five microphones are convenient, the "expansion" left-right is adjustable according to the desires and can also record with 4 Channels.
The price / quality ratio is good, especially if you know where to buy. In Thomannn is a more affordable creature, a little less in Fnac.
If I davais choice again I would. I do not think it happens because the machine is solid. However, the miniSD-SD adapter is already trapped inside the mine, so take a normal SD and everything will be fine.
Hoping you have rendered service
Ethan Van Guard.
14 of 15 people found this review helpful
DjCaylus's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
First dictaphone that I acquired. Compared options with Olympus friends and this one seemed the most comprehensive integrated with 4 capsules for up to 4-channel recordings.
Possibility of selecting up to 4 channels of records "Surround". Settings before share and rear .... Great versatility!
Money "honest". The plastic is a little cheap. The options are great! - The accessory pack could be understood.
I would do this choice without hesitation! Gone with the lil interrieur that exterrieur ideally entails.
1 of 3 people found this review helpful
Ian Til'Han's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Zoom h2n = quality"
Well, big plus for the quality of sound (to save a concert or rehearsal, it's just giant!), The mobile side I record when I want, it's great, the price for that quality is really good! In short it is a 9/10!
4 of 4 people found this review helpful
ssebs's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" good quality / price ratio, compact"
I also have a h4n less compact.
What I find great is recording fast as possible in 4 channels. And I especially love the way mid / side (unfortunately not available in 4 channels). This sets the stereo width afterwards. For me it is very useful for recording such sounds brook, where the width change much.
The recording quality is ok for the price. Compared to h4n there quite breath more (it can be reduced in software).
2 of 3 people found this review helpful
vanarnold's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" great machine for the price"
I use a 4-channel surround soundtracks for documentaries, a handful or a pole.
files are superb.
would have paid a fortune as good machine and easy to use there are 5 or 6 years.
I had a h4 before, I was less happy with the microphone.
not hesitate one second, the accessory kit is also good (handle and ricotta).
5 of 5 people found this review helpful
It certainly does not need to ask him to replace a pair of good mics and preamps convertos + good, but the sound is very honorable.
Another plus: the ability to record in taking Xy + mic / line (2pistes stereo)
1 of 4 people found this review helpful