U-FLYstudio
Note : 8 sur 10
Published on 08/01/08 at 14:49
Best value:
Poor
Micro small enough cardio with capsule mounted side (quite rare, it can not find this kind of editing as in Schoeps, Sennheiser and Josephson and high prices)
very easy to implement, it is far from being versatile, although some sources are not all accurately transcribed!
piano, is fairly consistent despite a lack of serious percussion, the sensitivity is at once more appropriate rendering overheads, hi-hat, gong, xylophone, etc. and excellent. on classical soloists (soprano, tenor, violin solo) the result is less coherent than Shure KSM 137 for example or a 3000 AE Brand
OVERALL OPINION
Micro discreet, very friendly sources generating a response curve between 150 and 20 000 Hz, or for any source requiring close proximity, to avoid both the sources too aggressive, I prefer the AE3000 at any point, not so much larger, which for me is a real success
very easy to implement, it is far from being versatile, although some sources are not all accurately transcribed!
piano, is fairly consistent despite a lack of serious percussion, the sensitivity is at once more appropriate rendering overheads, hi-hat, gong, xylophone, etc. and excellent. on classical soloists (soprano, tenor, violin solo) the result is less coherent than Shure KSM 137 for example or a 3000 AE Brand
OVERALL OPINION
Micro discreet, very friendly sources generating a response curve between 150 and 20 000 Hz, or for any source requiring close proximity, to avoid both the sources too aggressive, I prefer the AE3000 at any point, not so much larger, which for me is a real success