Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Our members also liked:
4.0/5(1 reviews)
100 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
lord_toskanoPublished on 01/12/10 at 04:30 (This content has been automatically translated from French)2 years
already tried that of SHADOW SH 965 NFX-B. not better ...
the +: sound quality, noise, amplitude of each rglages bands that allows for fairly specific on rglage.
the -: no band on the midle paramtric (a few missing if there is no amp or console to correct frquence parasite ... but good. is not a console !
Report qualitprix very honnte ... Whereas especially when it is manufactured by hand in the USA.
I shall spare but very often that I recognize each does a great utility. And it is a simple and efficient analog preamp can be used therefore with almost everything which owns a cell or a piezo output somewhat symmetric rather weak.
If I needed a new preamp like this, I cert…Read more2 years
already tried that of SHADOW SH 965 NFX-B. not better ...
the +: sound quality, noise, amplitude of each rglages bands that allows for fairly specific on rglage.
the -: no band on the midle paramtric (a few missing if there is no amp or console to correct frquence parasite ... but good. is not a console !
Report qualitprix very honnte ... Whereas especially when it is manufactured by hand in the USA.
I shall spare but very often that I recognize each does a great utility. And it is a simple and efficient analog preamp can be used therefore with almost everything which owns a cell or a piezo output somewhat symmetric rather weak.
If I needed a new preamp like this, I certainly would do that choice.See less10