Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Jackson DKMG Dinky reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Jackson DKMG Dinky
Images
1/224
Jackson DKMG Dinky

STC-Shaped Guitar from Jackson belonging to the MG series

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
DebileDead DebileDead
Published on 07/23/06 at 02:56
Best value: Excellent
- Made in Japan
- 24 frets, EMG Active: emg85 in handle and emg81 in vibrato.
- Floyd Rose ® Licensed Jackson ® Low Profile JT580 LP Double Locking 2-Point Tremolo
- Volume and tone pots 2, 3 micro switch positions so the middle handle vibrato.
- Bolt-On Rock Maple with Scarf Joint Head Stock
<p class="bbcode-offtopic"> Off topic: <span>Customizing for my model: Cobalt Blue Swirl the varnish of his body made ​​me fall over backwards!</span>

UTILIZATION

- Handle very nice with easy access to acute, typical Jackson
- Keys shred very intuitive mode: ON
- Weight evenly distributed really comfortable and lightweight, ergonomic design: the work of wavy groove in the neck, body bomber, easy access to all operations battery replacement, adjustment or floyd pots and tuning. (Radical change to my face BC.RICH Beast)
- A true machine harmonics, due to good freight and especially the duo of EMG active pick up any sounds the most HARD

SOUNDS

- 85 EMG81 and Jackson are still on a mix for big sound, the walls are shaky!
- I play on a 65W amp and a peavey Studiopro112 Preamp Behringer V-amp, but to really create a big sound it should be combined with a Marshall MG100.
- On the EMG85 we get a heavy sound in the middle position sound more vintage, and the EMG81 was a modern sound (solo, harmonics etc.).
- The setting of active pickups gives incredible feeling, it really captures the sounds heavier.

OVERALL OPINION

- I've had three days and I feel the shredder back to me.
- It is typed exactly like the guitar that I wanted.
- Before I try different strat models, sg, les paul, warlock / warrior ... often passive.
- A good value for money for a guitar out early this year!
- Mickey Donald Pluto!? uh I mean yes I take it back because it corresponds fully to my expectations.