View other reviews for this product:
ekerisann
Published on 09/27/07 at 00:50
Alder body (with maple veneer on transparent finishes for Tiger), Maple Bolt-on neck, maple fingerboard, Seymour Duncan SH-2N (handle) + TB-4JB (Bridge, as recommended for normal floyd, weird), bridge rope to cross Tunamatic Jackson, Black hardware.
The handle is the head at the back have a look "natural" which is a little bare
8 screwed to the handle and the fact that we can not take advantage of a push / pull while the microphone is splitable
UTILIZATION
Channel Pleasant thinner than most jackson, access to acute not because of the super Bolt, shape and weight regularly, and one of the classic tit-flat for the selector (a 3 position type Gibson would have been better, the kinds Start 'are ergonomic way to my taste in 3 positions)
SOUNDS
I mainly play metal in all its forms but I am a big consumer of its also clear ...
Micro Bridge: - A distortion-distortion with a good gain that potato but is rather a mat and with gaps in details on the treble, black spot: Where are the mediums?? Many acute, quite low for SD but not many mediums! Frustrating!
- Clear sound - it was something fairly crystalline, but very flat and without personality
Neck pickup: - The disto-it becomes more interesting, one obtains an accurate and well rounded (weird for the SD for that matter) is a micro Jazz at the same time, when you lose a bit of aggression and lacks some sustain
- Clear - much better than a clean rack with lots of bass but still this side a little mat, a typed too clean for my taste ... Jazz
OVERALL OPINION
The other scratch my group uses it, so I tested it at home, taking the opportunity to take a picture of Jackson (see profile Idroken)
I like the stick close to my Ibanez but I have trouble with the neck pickup times and especially the lack of mediums General
I tested the the Gibson Ibanez Jackson ESP of the Washburn and I think this guitar is too expensive for what it is ... So rapport-/qualité very average prices since the increase to 649 euros!
If I wanted a floyd guitar without it I would not have it to because its on his sleeve too typed too neutral bridge and its lack of media is a barrier.
The handle is the head at the back have a look "natural" which is a little bare
8 screwed to the handle and the fact that we can not take advantage of a push / pull while the microphone is splitable
UTILIZATION
Channel Pleasant thinner than most jackson, access to acute not because of the super Bolt, shape and weight regularly, and one of the classic tit-flat for the selector (a 3 position type Gibson would have been better, the kinds Start 'are ergonomic way to my taste in 3 positions)
SOUNDS
I mainly play metal in all its forms but I am a big consumer of its also clear ...
Micro Bridge: - A distortion-distortion with a good gain that potato but is rather a mat and with gaps in details on the treble, black spot: Where are the mediums?? Many acute, quite low for SD but not many mediums! Frustrating!
- Clear sound - it was something fairly crystalline, but very flat and without personality
Neck pickup: - The disto-it becomes more interesting, one obtains an accurate and well rounded (weird for the SD for that matter) is a micro Jazz at the same time, when you lose a bit of aggression and lacks some sustain
- Clear - much better than a clean rack with lots of bass but still this side a little mat, a typed too clean for my taste ... Jazz
OVERALL OPINION
The other scratch my group uses it, so I tested it at home, taking the opportunity to take a picture of Jackson (see profile Idroken)
I like the stick close to my Ibanez but I have trouble with the neck pickup times and especially the lack of mediums General
I tested the the Gibson Ibanez Jackson ESP of the Washburn and I think this guitar is too expensive for what it is ... So rapport-/qualité very average prices since the increase to 649 euros!
If I wanted a floyd guitar without it I would not have it to because its on his sleeve too typed too neutral bridge and its lack of media is a barrier.