jycom
Note : 10 sur 10
« Good big sound »
Published on 12/16/11 at 07:46- How long have you use it?
> I use the M50 for a little over a year. Prcdemment I had the excellent little ATH-M35 (either a foldable ATH-M30) which is, however, down compared to M50
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
> Yes, Shure SRH range, Seinheiser HD25 and ATH-M35
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
> Top: a sick banana without any distortion whatsoever; low doses beautiful just for music massively by electronic rhythms; precision in the treble
> Cons: essential requirement for a running-in phase during premires hours of listening; for listening acoustic, jazz or classical, open headphones are more suited my view that it is fermbr />
- How do you report qualitprix?
An absolutely excellent, there is no equivalent on the plant. headphones over 300 euros have that behave.
- With the exprience, you do again this choice?
Yes without any hesitation. I expect a successor in hopes it even better!
> I use the M50 for a little over a year. Prcdemment I had the excellent little ATH-M35 (either a foldable ATH-M30) which is, however, down compared to M50
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
> Yes, Shure SRH range, Seinheiser HD25 and ATH-M35
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
> Top: a sick banana without any distortion whatsoever; low doses beautiful just for music massively by electronic rhythms; precision in the treble
> Cons: essential requirement for a running-in phase during premires hours of listening; for listening acoustic, jazz or classical, open headphones are more suited my view that it is fermbr />
- How do you report qualitprix?
An absolutely excellent, there is no equivalent on the plant. headphones over 300 euros have that behave.
- With the exprience, you do again this choice?
Yes without any hesitation. I expect a successor in hopes it even better!