View other reviews for this product:
le reverend « A good headphone trs not (too) expensive »
Published on 11/28/11 at 09:03I use this headset for years, and before I used a dad, the HD250 Linear.
I like the quality of restitution, it's my headphones Hifi of references. It is relatively neutral my ears, no surprsentes low, no acute surpousss, mediums intelligible, what more?
The comfort of cost? Oh, also it has.
The sound? Yes, also (though I pass a bunch of times over my seat with wheels)
The look? each judge, I find it difficult
The price? Not too expensive I think. Ears, it's important for those who love music, so as not mgoter. You can find more expensive and better, but the quality Is this better? However, with more expensive headphones look of blind and overboosted radio bandwidth in the low, ay in plthore for addicts look killer in town.
I tried and had other headphones in my life:
- When an old Koss j'tais teenager, something that must have weighed 25 kilos (well OK j'exagre a little bit) with its silent trs trs but enjoyable round. The last I could try koss taient not the same quality.
- The Sennheiser HD linear, first name. I t happy until that bad contacts make me look for a successor after more than ten years of loyal service. Only after purchasing the linear II that I look more prs bad contacts and everything back on their feet. Indestructible, whatever. This headset is always me.
- A Sony MDR V500 DJ, not given. Not bad at cost. Quite fragile, I have a headset with a speaker is no one jumps to cash volume. but especially in UNCOMFORTABLE possible. After 20 minutes, you tear the head with that thing on the ears.
- An AKG 240. good headphone, not too expensive (one hundred euros) and a fairly neutral as well. For cost of the zik on my computer or to record the night in the apartment, it's good.
But for the hi-fi, even when I prfre the Sennheiser.
I like the quality of restitution, it's my headphones Hifi of references. It is relatively neutral my ears, no surprsentes low, no acute surpousss, mediums intelligible, what more?
The comfort of cost? Oh, also it has.
The sound? Yes, also (though I pass a bunch of times over my seat with wheels)
The look? each judge, I find it difficult
The price? Not too expensive I think. Ears, it's important for those who love music, so as not mgoter. You can find more expensive and better, but the quality Is this better? However, with more expensive headphones look of blind and overboosted radio bandwidth in the low, ay in plthore for addicts look killer in town.
I tried and had other headphones in my life:
- When an old Koss j'tais teenager, something that must have weighed 25 kilos (well OK j'exagre a little bit) with its silent trs trs but enjoyable round. The last I could try koss taient not the same quality.
- The Sennheiser HD linear, first name. I t happy until that bad contacts make me look for a successor after more than ten years of loyal service. Only after purchasing the linear II that I look more prs bad contacts and everything back on their feet. Indestructible, whatever. This headset is always me.
- A Sony MDR V500 DJ, not given. Not bad at cost. Quite fragile, I have a headset with a speaker is no one jumps to cash volume. but especially in UNCOMFORTABLE possible. After 20 minutes, you tear the head with that thing on the ears.
- An AKG 240. good headphone, not too expensive (one hundred euros) and a fairly neutral as well. For cost of the zik on my computer or to record the night in the apartment, it's good.
But for the hi-fi, even when I prfre the Sennheiser.