CDJ-1000 MK2 classified ad
New ad alertImages
Videos
Reviews
4.5/5(23 reviews)
70 %
22 %
4 %
4 %
Write a user review
david grillatPublished on 09/03/06 at 14:45 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Test http://www.davidgrillat.com heading "matod dj"!
00
»
Silly NovaIntuable
Published on 09/25/14 at 12:21 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I have for almost 10 years and they still work perfectly.
Well I do not think back on his duties as everyone know.
But to give you an idea, apart from playing MP3 and hard drives, nothing has changed on the CDJ2000. Moreover, they are 100 times stronger than the MKIII repeatedly sent in for repair by friends.
Well I do not think back on his duties as everyone know.
But to give you an idea, apart from playing MP3 and hard drives, nothing has changed on the CDJ2000. Moreover, they are 100 times stronger than the MKIII repeatedly sent in for repair by friends.
00
»
LePremierMinistrePublished on 05/10/05 at 11:52 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
User CDJ 1000 MKII version for 1 month. J'apprcie its robustness, precision controls and intuitiva orders. Of course, great sound, that comes from Fawn homogne.
MODELS essays compared
Denon DNS 3000 and 5000: Good turntable, but trs complex and unreliable as many users. Denon DNS 1000, a little gadget, a little expensive.
Numark CDX 1: very good scratch, mp3 playback, but effects trs means, tainted by its hiss. I do not speak of "famous bug" Numark, which can happen in the middle reading (APRS VCU 20 minutes of use). In addition, the controls are less accessible than a pioneer.
Technics SlDz 1200: Fairly good platinum, average effects, look terrible, but a turntable...…
MODELS essays compared
Denon DNS 3000 and 5000: Good turntable, but trs complex and unreliable as many users. Denon DNS 1000, a little gadget, a little expensive.
Numark CDX 1: very good scratch, mp3 playback, but effects trs means, tainted by its hiss. I do not speak of "famous bug" Numark, which can happen in the middle reading (APRS VCU 20 minutes of use). In addition, the controls are less accessible than a pioneer.
Technics SlDz 1200: Fairly good platinum, average effects, look terrible, but a turntable...…
Read more
User CDJ 1000 MKII version for 1 month. J'apprcie its robustness, precision controls and intuitiva orders. Of course, great sound, that comes from Fawn homogne.
MODELS essays compared
Denon DNS 3000 and 5000: Good turntable, but trs complex and unreliable as many users. Denon DNS 1000, a little gadget, a little expensive.
Numark CDX 1: very good scratch, mp3 playback, but effects trs means, tainted by its hiss. I do not speak of "famous bug" Numark, which can happen in the middle reading (APRS VCU 20 minutes of use). In addition, the controls are less accessible than a pioneer.
Technics SlDz 1200: Fairly good platinum, average effects, look terrible, but a turntable inoperable due to a gap between the "felt" and the base. In addition, the pitch is too flexible and does not allow rglage prcis speed. Damage
In the end, the CDJ 1000 MKII is the REFERENCE in terms of precision, robustness and reliability. The reverse function allows CRER trs sounds nice live. The loop is trs own, the connection inaudible. Finally, three Hot Cue calluses are the hair, and suffer no lag when they are seeking.
Note, the CD TEXT function, which displays the title of the current track, or the display of the waveform of the track to see the idle time (not beat) according to the progression of the title and cue points.
I put 10 without hsiter.
MODELS essays compared
Denon DNS 3000 and 5000: Good turntable, but trs complex and unreliable as many users. Denon DNS 1000, a little gadget, a little expensive.
Numark CDX 1: very good scratch, mp3 playback, but effects trs means, tainted by its hiss. I do not speak of "famous bug" Numark, which can happen in the middle reading (APRS VCU 20 minutes of use). In addition, the controls are less accessible than a pioneer.
Technics SlDz 1200: Fairly good platinum, average effects, look terrible, but a turntable inoperable due to a gap between the "felt" and the base. In addition, the pitch is too flexible and does not allow rglage prcis speed. Damage
In the end, the CDJ 1000 MKII is the REFERENCE in terms of precision, robustness and reliability. The reverse function allows CRER trs sounds nice live. The loop is trs own, the connection inaudible. Finally, three Hot Cue calluses are the hair, and suffer no lag when they are seeking.
Note, the CD TEXT function, which displays the title of the current track, or the display of the waveform of the track to see the idle time (not beat) according to the progression of the title and cue points.
I put 10 without hsiter.
See less
00
»
dj xamPublished on 06/27/05 at 10:59 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Well hello, it's dj xam I mix cdj 1000mk2 on the ball .....
buy a close eye, though the trick for me the most powerful on the plate and the precision and super controllable jog .. voila!
buy a close eye, though the trick for me the most powerful on the plate and the precision and super controllable jog .. voila!
00
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Pioneer
- Model: CDJ-1000 MK2
- Series: CDJ
- Category: Tabletop DJ players
- Added in our database on: 09/28/2005
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Manuals and other files
Other categories in DJ CD Players
Other names: cdj1000mk2, cdj 1000 mk 2, cdj1000 mk2, cdj 1000mk2, cdj 1000 mkii, cdj1000mkii, cdj1000 mkii, cdj 1000mkii