Pioneer CDJ-1000 MK2
+
Pioneer CDJ-1000 MK2

CDJ-1000 MK2, Tabletop DJ player from Pioneer in the CDJ series.

  • Increase or decrease font size
  • Print
  • RSS

All user reviews of 5/5 for the Pioneer CDJ-1000 MK2

  • Like
  • Tweet
  • Submit
lovekats12/29/2005

lovekats's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Pioneer CDJ-1000 MK2
T have a lot of things said about almost every aspect of the CDJ.
I do not dwell on the scratch, since c'tait one of my concerns with plates Cds.
I come from the world of vinyl, I am part of a group I use a bit o barr samples of rare records (but also rare and expensive) as I could no longer afford to pay 30 + cost of disk port + a few hours of research on e-bay and other I bought a Cdj.

Premire any use, I plug in my Hak360 and good, I'm a little bit, it's not top top, monitoring dawdling a bit (my turntable is a vestax pdx).
And I still, dj I change the direction of installation for the hip hop into position and is carrment strong. Dj APRS a little practice I found something that approaches the touch vinyl but also with the position the cue HH I just below the thumb, so that I can scratch almost every s frequency instantly.
Rpond plate well to single-stage baby, crab, orbit. Obviously useless too acclrer with this kind of stuff is not for, I also at times a small loss on some follow-up phases RPTES scratch too often, "it begins beginners to scratch on a sentence and hop, you get to the next word. " This is certainly the hitchhiking of the plate which engages a pressure slightly higher labor on the board, I'm not 100% sr
Finally more blah, they are the top decks Cds
libulee10/26/2005

libulee's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Pioneer CDJ-1000 MK2
Hello

I have at home a CDJ1000 I use every day ... and a friend had bought a year ago a pair of SLDZ1200. Obviously I have well tested and very objectively, there is no advantage to have the Technics

A small rsumcomparatif what I noticed:
-> Posting:
<ul>
no tag on SLDZ (or it only supports one type of tag-tag1? - after what I understood ke)
no "graphic" as the track on the CDJ either,
no visual localization cue points can be registered in both the CD as one track ...
</ul>

-> Handling:
Shelf:
<ul>
simulation vinyl fish a little, because we feel a large clearance between the false bottom and the top vinyl .. the top of the plateau is really very lightweight, it feels plastic handle no more or less,
difficult to also resumed on the board despite the presence of a segment made for a. .. it can be a personal deformation due to intensive use of CDJ but I could not help but look at the display instead of numrique mark on the disc ...
after, stalling a drive: can not handle the disc in the centering, since there is no centering, but has instead, the face of the display numrique so everything is done by manipulating the pitch and plateau (some say it's not so bad ... Yeah ..)
</ul>

cue points:
to the rescue! there is a whole mthodo to ask a cue point (the point bank call, get in "record", remove the master tempo - if not the sound when you scratch PForm locally to quickly regained point Cue, and finally save the CUE)
while on the CDJ, tac you block the plate, lean on CUE and talk about it more.

loops:
CDJs unlike the first cue point is automatically recorded Whereas as the IN point of a loop ...
the IN and OUT points are not adjusted when registered (bad bad bad bad!)

samples:
it is possible to create 4 samples directly and easily, meaning you save four samples of live music. It's pretty fun
on the other hand they can not be changed thereafter (or their tempo, or their points of commencement / end). They can swing (loop or not) the current song or other piece of the same CD very easily but watch out for problems of Difference of sample-tempo song, and timing of sample irretrievable! very high risk of "colic" if too much training, so (or a vodka or two apples are in the process of dissolution in the body) ...
Via a menu you can select the fawn that we want to use the sample (in a loop, one shot ... etc) but there has Intrets know what you want, the menu navigation as a little long I can not see using it full mix ...

effects:
cool effects and fun but not good quality / hard mode paramtrables vinyl .... very frustrating not being able to filter paramtrer kan same.

-> Aesthetics:
looks like Quasimodo: beeeeeelle ... beeeeeelle the SLDZ is beautiful, but, I push open doors
has rated the CDJ is still a little jog in the ac cheap plastoc ...

Appraisal:
new stuff = new technique I do not mind but in the case of SLDZ, I found much less intuitive than the CDJ ... You really acqurir new RFLEX that are not those of the vinyl ...
As long as you mix on a turntable as a password (no cue, pitch to pitch) but in this case, what Intrets?
From the moment when one begins to want CRER a loop, has become more touchy on the CDJ SLDZ ... In the IDAL should prparer his case in advance (save-all samples, loops - in an SD card) because the errors are not easily recoverable.

well here's a little personal in my opinion I do not objectify any action at Pioneer;) ...
I prcise that since my friend sold its SLDZ to buy CDJ 1000: p .. c'tait his first turntables for info.

PS: I also added 2 pTis dtails:
- Display "Countdown" is not on mp3
- PBME distortion of the very sensitive (mainly mp3) when you scratch with the active master tempo (difficult to calibrate a CUE)
gloubby10/16/2005

gloubby's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Pioneer CDJ-1000 MK2
Hello, we still do not know if it reads the mp3?

qq the fact a person knows or can find hints and tips for each mix?

thank you
fakroun33309/09/2005

fakroun333's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Pioneer CDJ-1000 MK2
I have a small problem
y 'he scratches and stains bizarre ki appeared below my cdj 1000 mk2 and I do not know how
more places are on top of a window and the location of my CDJ1000 mk2 he y 'white spots on the glass. could you please help me understand.

ke the device can be heated .... I do not know
PLEASE HELP ME
THANK YOU
dj xam06/27/2005

dj xam's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Pioneer CDJ-1000 MK2
Well hello, it's dj xam I mix cdj 1000mk2 on the ball .....
buy a close eye, though the trick for me the most powerful on the plate and the precision and super controllable jog .. voila!
LePremierMinistre05/10/2005

LePremierMinistre's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Pioneer CDJ-1000 MK2
User CDJ 1000 MKII version for 1 month. J'apprcie its robustness, precision controls and intuitiva orders. Of course, great sound, that comes from Fawn homogne.

MODELS essays compared

Denon DNS 3000 and 5000: Good turntable, but trs complex and unreliable as many users. Denon DNS 1000, a little gadget, a little expensive.

Numark CDX 1: very good scratch, mp3 playback, but effects trs means, tainted by its hiss. I do not speak of "famous bug" Numark, which can happen in the middle reading (APRS VCU 20 minutes of use). In addition, the controls are less accessible than a pioneer.

Technics SlDz 1200: Fairly good platinum, average effects, look terrible, but a turntable inoperable due to a gap between the "felt" and the base. In addition, the pitch is too flexible and does not allow rglage prcis speed. Damage

In the end, the CDJ 1000 MKII is the REFERENCE in terms of precision, robustness and reliability. The reverse function allows CRER trs sounds nice live. The loop is trs own, the connection inaudible. Finally, three Hot Cue calluses are the hair, and suffer no lag when they are seeking.

Note, the CD TEXT function, which displays the title of the current track, or the display of the waveform of the track to see the idle time (not beat) according to the progression of the title and cue points.

I put 10 without hsiter.