Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Our members also liked:
4.1/5(9 reviews)
22 %
56 %
11 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
freddydjSmall and convenient
Published on 12/09/13 at 11:10 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I have been using for 2 years and a half.
Before I had the cdj 400 and I had a lot of different decks in the club where I worked: cdj 500 cdj 100s cdj 800 cdj 1000, etc ...
what I like most is the compact size for travel across various delivery, and playback from USB key. Least is the lack of effect compared to cdj 400 and auto loop function.
It is on this choice I would as excellent value for money.Read moreI have been using for 2 years and a half.
Before I had the cdj 400 and I had a lot of different decks in the club where I worked: cdj 500 cdj 100s cdj 800 cdj 1000, etc ...
what I like most is the compact size for travel across various delivery, and playback from USB key. Least is the lack of effect compared to cdj 400 and auto loop function.
It is on this choice I would as excellent value for money.See less01
d-trackquality Pionner
Published on 12/11/12 at 00:31 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for 2 years
Before, I had CDJ 100 S
What I like the most, their look, their small size, easily transportable wheel "toothed", accuracy, robustness, support usb and simple navigation between folder and titles.
What I like least, not much, maybe the fact that there was no effect, yet cdj 100 s first generation had 3 effects, cdj 400 also, the manufacturer's choice a bit disappointing.
The value for money is always in the same pioneer, it's expensive! The quality is there, then we have to accept ...Read moreI use it for 2 years
Before, I had CDJ 100 S
What I like the most, their look, their small size, easily transportable wheel "toothed", accuracy, robustness, support usb and simple navigation between folder and titles.
What I like least, not much, maybe the fact that there was no effect, yet cdj 100 s first generation had 3 effects, cdj 400 also, the manufacturer's choice a bit disappointing.
The value for money is always in the same pioneer, it's expensive! The quality is there, then we have to accept ...See less02- maxence.bourden
genial!!
Published on 11/29/12 at 05:54 (This content has been automatically translated from French)How long have you been using?
I've had it now 5 months
Did you try many other models before buying it?
I tested a lot of platinum in: Pioneer, Numark, Gemini, Denon
she is really beautiful it really includes all certe nothing to do with the cdj 2000 but it has everything and all these functions are useful and enjoyable! I recommend it.
I use it with the DJM 350 and it is really the BALL
value for money and certe a bit expensive but its still the pioneer and she vau t worth it as it reacted great02 
Dj dzilSuper Platinum! simple and effective
Published on 06/10/12 at 05:05 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for two days (Friday and delivered the first Saturday evening). I tried many decks before I decide for the ones. My colleague with the 2000 the choice was difficult to not be disappointed because I usually work with its governance.
Frankly I'm not disappointed on the contrary I am very pleasantly surprised, the deck responds really well, nothing superfluous, everything is at hand.
Concerning the management of removable media nothing to say, when everything happened in rekordbox, research of its securities is a breeze.
The bpm is pretty decent, but nothing better than to rely on the ear ....
The mix cd is also easy, charging is fast enough, and all functions comply with a …Read moreI use it for two days (Friday and delivered the first Saturday evening). I tried many decks before I decide for the ones. My colleague with the 2000 the choice was difficult to not be disappointed because I usually work with its governance.
Frankly I'm not disappointed on the contrary I am very pleasantly surprised, the deck responds really well, nothing superfluous, everything is at hand.
Concerning the management of removable media nothing to say, when everything happened in rekordbox, research of its securities is a breeze.
The bpm is pretty decent, but nothing better than to rely on the ear ....
The mix cd is also easy, charging is fast enough, and all functions comply with a quarter turn.
Divide the function loop is really great, but use sparingly ....
Associated with my RMC 55 I'm having. I would do this choice without hesitation.
The value for money is OK, as always pioneer is expensive, but the product is really well done.See less02
slyyderToo expensive in nine
Published on 03/17/12 at 17:19 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for 2 months
Yes CDj numark NDX800 CDj 800 400
+ Very precise cumbersome may
- Touch the jog not terrible I prefer that of the 400 or NDX800
The value taken not too awful expensive!
No I do again this choice!
I bought used a good deal11- Dj azzano
good product
Published on 01/14/12 at 00:31 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for 10 months.
it is a good product easy to use, with good quality / price ratio.
For cons I do not rekorbox, just to prepare playlists
I put it on usb.
I think I would do the same choice as for the right budget is good
equipment.01 
alex2305super nice!
Published on 12/27/11 at 05:48 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for 8 months, I ride with 2 cdj 350 and djm 350 1.
This is my first cdj I used a small USB controller before and I wanted to take a heavier lol!
This is an entry level course at Pioneer but I would say to start mixing is great, it has all of great.
The coolest feature is the USB connection (I would say indispensable to the digital age), the BPM lock (always useful from time to time), Loop and Beat Loop Divide.
The pioneer gear is always a little but I Exess remake that choice without hesitation.01- FeeL-31
Not bad but not a "bomb"
Published on 07/20/11 at 12:03 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I started mixing in 1987 and really mix the tempo and sequence in 1988 at the time acid house and techno with Technics MK2, I officiated pro for over ten years, only in nightclubs , bars, pubs, or techno parties
I finally launched this year on CD (although I no longer "pro" now, just mix with me or friends), I chose to automatically Technics and I wanted something new, given the exorbitant price and scandalous large models of the brand I chose the 350
the transition to "plateau" has cost a few hours to understand all the subtleties but ultimately it is a technology that I find the point
I use no CD but with songs stored on USB flash drive 64 go, we gain precious time to mix the pie…Read moreI started mixing in 1987 and really mix the tempo and sequence in 1988 at the time acid house and techno with Technics MK2, I officiated pro for over ten years, only in nightclubs , bars, pubs, or techno parties
I finally launched this year on CD (although I no longer "pro" now, just mix with me or friends), I chose to automatically Technics and I wanted something new, given the exorbitant price and scandalous large models of the brand I chose the 350
the transition to "plateau" has cost a few hours to understand all the subtleties but ultimately it is a technology that I find the point
I use no CD but with songs stored on USB flash drive 64 go, we gain precious time to mix the pieces below, is the thing that really amazed!
they have no effect but it does not bother me since I assignable effects on my DJM 400, I used quite a few anyway
by then the tempo issue against it thickens, it was not the time to add a decimal to BPM because they are not accurate enough to enjoy it, there are even times where I made long mixes with a BPM difference between the two pieces being yet totally in tune "by ear" unacceptable when one uses a decimal BPM!
that's why the score will be lowered because really the rest is almost all good (except the inflated price knowing the margin applied ...)
PS: I use them for 5 monthsSee less72 - DUDUDJ
Finally a simple platinum
Published on 10/17/10 at 05:58 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I was looking for turntables simple, sober and effective and not fawn tuning since they like to do now besides the 400 had no escapes this rule (I started the profession as it Twenty years ago on the famous MK2 may be just the rejection of my gadgets quickly tiresome term for that matter). Everything works perfectly. No more, no less, she has what it takes o properly.
As I said above, simple, clean and efficient ... I saw a young DJ working LATEST equipped with a hardware copy but has rotted his evening programming pollutant effects indigestible and constant repetitive Why? Just because this young dj has not the key bases of the animation. Dj young, I address you, start by learning sound t…Read moreI was looking for turntables simple, sober and effective and not fawn tuning since they like to do now besides the 400 had no escapes this rule (I started the profession as it Twenty years ago on the famous MK2 may be just the rejection of my gadgets quickly tiresome term for that matter). Everything works perfectly. No more, no less, she has what it takes o properly.
As I said above, simple, clean and efficient ... I saw a young DJ working LATEST equipped with a hardware copy but has rotted his evening programming pollutant effects indigestible and constant repetitive Why? Just because this young dj has not the key bases of the animation. Dj young, I address you, start by learning sound tempo, Entran you make cuts audible voice, the number of buttons on a deck is not a guarantee of success, by a cons good programming is the cl of Russianness a good evening. The cdj 350 you will due to its simplicity, believe me ...
See less21