Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Our members also liked:
4.5/5(5 reviews)
40 %
40 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
nicosennPublished on 02/07/05 at 07:30 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Hello
I seek someone who connatrait Sennheiser SKM 5000 prs and can advise me the best version. For example do take a head neumann kk105s worth it?
And what rcepteur (the cheapest possible) gives good results?
Thank you
For now I put 9 product because I think LA has still mic in terms of HF by reference number00- sebaltoPublished on 02/07/05 at 14:53 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use daily the receiver rack 8 with 2 antennas and an antenna distributor and no problem in general. on the other hand, we have abandoned the skm 5000 because too dull compared our cravattes mke40 capsules.00
lololuppinA disappointed not to buy
Published on 05/06/12 at 08:40 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I worked several years with this system SKM5000 head with Neumann K105S + EM3031 it is well on professional equipment of very good quality, however, few people outside of its pros able to properly adjust the microphone under penalty of a clings so constantly to user frustration over the rooms used by musical groups are far from irreproachable acoustic level that does not help and finally when the frequency plans change (December 2011) and the microphone functioning or very poorly depending on the location Sennheiser turned a deaf ear does not offer any commercial solution even respond to registered letters. Again when it comes to paying everyone responds to this area any more shadow person.…Read moreI worked several years with this system SKM5000 head with Neumann K105S + EM3031 it is well on professional equipment of very good quality, however, few people outside of its pros able to properly adjust the microphone under penalty of a clings so constantly to user frustration over the rooms used by musical groups are far from irreproachable acoustic level that does not help and finally when the frequency plans change (December 2011) and the microphone functioning or very poorly depending on the location Sennheiser turned a deaf ear does not offer any commercial solution even respond to registered letters. Again when it comes to paying everyone responds to this area any more shadow person. Good material very sharp and difficult to use by everyone everywhere. In my case never a Sennheiser in the rest of my musical life.See less04- sebaltoPublished on 02/07/05 at 14:53 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use daily the receiver rack 8 with 2 antennas and a distributor of antennas and no problem in general. on the other hand, we have abandoned the skm 5000 as too dull compared our neckties mke40 capsules.01
- nicosennPublished on 02/10/05 at 11:49 (This content has been automatically translated from French)That's it I could pay a set with a head SKM5000 me 5005 (supercardiode singing) and Receivers em 3031.
Advantages: Design, Door (50mW power of mission), transmission of the state batteries Receivers, high quality sound (I think CHARACTERISTICS seen, the 5005 has me rponse one more than me homogne 5005th), modularity ease of use ...
Inconvnients: Receivers imposing 16 frquences fixed (not easily changed), price (of course)
Overall I think it is THE REFERENCERead moreThat's it I could pay a set with a head SKM5000 me 5005 (supercardiode singing) and Receivers em 3031.
Advantages: Design, Door (50mW power of mission), transmission of the state batteries Receivers, high quality sound (I think CHARACTERISTICS seen, the 5005 has me rponse one more than me homogne 5005th), modularity ease of use ...
Inconvnients: Receivers imposing 16 frquences fixed (not easily changed), price (of course)
Overall I think it is THE REFERENCESee less12