View other reviews for this product:
kevsono
Published on 01/18/09 at 05:39
Hello everybody. Here I will give my positive advice on Shure ...
How long have you use it?
I use it for a few months to be more prcis I use it for 4 months
Did you try other models before acqurir?
Yes, I have been testing as MODELS Mac Mah, Samson, Toa, and of course stay on Shure. He might have the quality Pg 58, we really feel like using an SM 58. It is a high quality microphone that I have the opportunity to use more professional than this, I am personally satisfied with TRS.
How do you judge the report qualitprix?
Personally I find nothing shocking. I do not think it's an expensive compared to the microphones trs UR4D HF Receivers with whom I work daily. But despite its price drisoire, its quality is Ingala. Without common sense, of course.
Exprience with, you will do again this choice?
I prsume as a self-evident and I would say that yes I do it again with no exprience this choice without any hsitation.
The sound reproduction of the microphone:
the +: large doors, no cuts HF signal and noise, grain ok but not equal to the sennheiser (I love sennheiser micro grain), long held about nine hours of battery, no noise of sagrable handling a microphone, Receivers installation quick and easy no antenna so vritable save space, we can stack in at least 10 no problem. Really no problem. Everything is perfect ...
I recommend ...
How long have you use it?
I use it for a few months to be more prcis I use it for 4 months
Did you try other models before acqurir?
Yes, I have been testing as MODELS Mac Mah, Samson, Toa, and of course stay on Shure. He might have the quality Pg 58, we really feel like using an SM 58. It is a high quality microphone that I have the opportunity to use more professional than this, I am personally satisfied with TRS.
How do you judge the report qualitprix?
Personally I find nothing shocking. I do not think it's an expensive compared to the microphones trs UR4D HF Receivers with whom I work daily. But despite its price drisoire, its quality is Ingala. Without common sense, of course.
Exprience with, you will do again this choice?
I prsume as a self-evident and I would say that yes I do it again with no exprience this choice without any hsitation.
The sound reproduction of the microphone:
the +: large doors, no cuts HF signal and noise, grain ok but not equal to the sennheiser (I love sennheiser micro grain), long held about nine hours of battery, no noise of sagrable handling a microphone, Receivers installation quick and easy no antenna so vritable save space, we can stack in at least 10 no problem. Really no problem. Everything is perfect ...
I recommend ...