ETV58/SM58 classified ad
Alerte nouvelle annonceImages
Reviews
4.0/5(3 reviews)
100 %
Write a user review
DjtipiPublished on 04/18/07 at 01:23 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I use the microwave for 7 years (ETV version 58D)
It really looks like a SM58 wire ... with some small parasites if we get too far away from the receiver ...
The sound is really good. It is a very easy to use micro but relatively low-end at the "OFF".
If you have anything to do with your microphone to animate the dances, go to the version of Shure UHF ... Obviously this is not the same price.
7 / 10 for the Shure quality in this price range.
It really looks like a SM58 wire ... with some small parasites if we get too far away from the receiver ...
The sound is really good. It is a very easy to use micro but relatively low-end at the "OFF".
If you have anything to do with your microphone to animate the dances, go to the version of Shure UHF ... Obviously this is not the same price.
7 / 10 for the Shure quality in this price range.
00
»
tarfoufiPublished on 02/16/05 at 02:57 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I use this system for 2 years on stage VHF and overall it does it well ... For the 400th one can still move around without tripping over that damn cable (well. ..)
Good for Feedback: You really have to point the microphone towards the back to make it parte pacifier, so it's cool on stage. The sound of the SM58 love me, and frankly it is well rendered by the RF system, do the test with an SM58 and SM58 HF wire ... Cloning!
Bad point for parasites: are two gain settings (3 with the knob on the front of the receiver) and yet my tests, there is a lot of noise ... Already good with laptops, some neon lights and especially the UHF Sennheiser (my guitarist's mouth to be shure) ... Shure not...…
Good for Feedback: You really have to point the microphone towards the back to make it parte pacifier, so it's cool on stage. The sound of the SM58 love me, and frankly it is well rendered by the RF system, do the test with an SM58 and SM58 HF wire ... Cloning!
Bad point for parasites: are two gain settings (3 with the knob on the front of the receiver) and yet my tests, there is a lot of noise ... Already good with laptops, some neon lights and especially the UHF Sennheiser (my guitarist's mouth to be shure) ... Shure not...…
Read more
I use this system for 2 years on stage VHF and overall it does it well ... For the 400th one can still move around without tripping over that damn cable (well. ..)
Good for Feedback: You really have to point the microphone towards the back to make it parte pacifier, so it's cool on stage. The sound of the SM58 love me, and frankly it is well rendered by the RF system, do the test with an SM58 and SM58 HF wire ... Cloning!
Bad point for parasites: are two gain settings (3 with the knob on the front of the receiver) and yet my tests, there is a lot of noise ... Already good with laptops, some neon lights and especially the UHF Sennheiser (my guitarist's mouth to be shure) ... Shure not put Senn and next, they love it ... So it's "all Shure" or "something else". Otherwise, on stage it is better to place the receiver in front of the console, because if the receiver is behind the singer, the breath appears ...
I have not tried other models before buying (it was a cado) but if it again, I would try to test the Sennheiser EW - and I would try to see the difference Shure UHF system
Good for Feedback: You really have to point the microphone towards the back to make it parte pacifier, so it's cool on stage. The sound of the SM58 love me, and frankly it is well rendered by the RF system, do the test with an SM58 and SM58 HF wire ... Cloning!
Bad point for parasites: are two gain settings (3 with the knob on the front of the receiver) and yet my tests, there is a lot of noise ... Already good with laptops, some neon lights and especially the UHF Sennheiser (my guitarist's mouth to be shure) ... Shure not put Senn and next, they love it ... So it's "all Shure" or "something else". Otherwise, on stage it is better to place the receiver in front of the console, because if the receiver is behind the singer, the breath appears ...
I have not tried other models before buying (it was a cado) but if it again, I would try to test the Sennheiser EW - and I would try to see the difference Shure UHF system
See less
00
»
Anonymous Published on 01/17/09 at 11:37 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
One of my former singers had this microphone ... It is a "medium range", ie good, nothing more. A good compromise for small grants. But the models must obviously be best multimdia. That said, even admitting that they do their job properly, it does not add value to your voice if you are tired or cold. He would then proceed to Beyerdynamic Opus 60 HF, which has a grain not possible, and that "holds" the voice that Shure has never been and probably never will, even the Beta 58.
Otherwise, yes, in a fleet of pickups, it has its place.
Otherwise, yes, in a fleet of pickups, it has its place.
00
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Shure
- Model: ETV58/SM58
- Category: Wireless systems
- Added in our database on: 09/27/2004
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other categories in Wireless gear
Other names: etv58 sm58, etv 58/sm 58, etv58sm58, etv 58sm 58, diversity vhf sm58, diversityvhfsm58, diversity vhf sm 58