- For how long have you been using it?

I received it yesterday and I tested it in rehearsal with my band.

- What thing do you like most/least about it?

I love the diversity that works great, no stall during the 2 hours of rehearsals. The frequency adjustment is easy through the receiver and very easy to transmit to the transmitter via infrared. In addition, the frequency display on the receiver and the transmitter is very valuable.
I also like the display of the remaining power level on the transmitter (microphone).

I like a little less sound quality of the dish that requires playing with the equalizer to get the sound that is sought.
The dynamic is not bad and the microphone also has a very good resistance to feedback and there is no handling noise, which is pretty rare on a static for the state.

- Did you try many other models before getting this one?

Actually this is my first wireless microphone.
But I've already worked, sang with different microphones:
Shure SM58, T. Bone MB85 Beta, T. Bone MB78 Beta

The PWS1000 fared better than the SM58 without equalization, and also has a small "bump" in the medium. After adjustment, it is doing almost as well as the MB85, but still one notch below the static wire (MB78 Beta) which is really a special microphone for pretty voice ^ ^

- What is your opinion about the value for the price?

Excellent! A Static Multi HF frequencies with diversity for 160 €!

- Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice?

I do not have enough experience to answer that question right now because I have not yet found "the" optimal setting.
I bought this mic a bit of spite ... Thomann why do we so not the same system with the capsule of MB85 Beta ??!??

I put 9 because at this price level, there is no competitor (condenser microphone).