All user reviews for the The T.bone SC450

Micro electro-static large diaphragm cardioid condenser, used for taking votes from me, a little singing. Comes with suspension, bote and elastic parts. Low-cut filter and gain 0-10 dB. The minimum.

OVERALL OPINION

Used recently but many, with a pramplificateur Joemeek Three Q (which MRIT better). The INTERESTED with this microphone is the ratio qualitprix unbeatable. Less than 100 euros and not blowing, bravo! refunds are good despite a bump in lgre mdiums which is not a major problem. The box is handy. The suspension is dfend but for those who love it shake that the microphone (especially for a position in diving), they are due. Indeed if one sticks a little SC450 suspension stems come in contact with the edge of the grid ... Excellent first investment in the Contents. The next will be a little more and a little more pro, but on the SC450 nothing to say for such a price that's why I put 10/10, add 50 euros there and I put 7 / 10 .

SC450 used only for singing on a branch prampli TL Audio 5050, or directly on a prampli makie.

OVERALL OPINION

Used for 8 months to record the song, he filled his office well, yes indeed, it has an unfortunate tendency to increase the whistling, but not abusive fawn, the real criticism I made him is his support whose screw me pt in the hands while trying to place the microphone of the inclined Camelott ....

if not, let's be honest, the price is just great, I compared it with microphones that have certainly nothing to see, but I had on hand, a Sennheiser MD421, and rode NT3 , and frankly the T bone is close enough for the return of the MD421, and when one criticizes the SC450 to have hissing, the NT3 and much more expensive, and absolutely crap in the registry. Enttendu well, my test is with the mid-range equipment, so they are what they are ... If you do not have a sub or you beginners, do not rush on the other Berhinger prodipe pub which abound in magazines, that's what micro you.
I'm not saying that a is a neumann, away from, but my taste what are the best in micro for the poor.
and further, the microphone is not everything, choose one suited prampli is impractical, learn to use it as much ... and exercise his ear, it goes without saying.

Already said.

OVERALL OPINION

A, SC-450! A microphone that has not only qualities: screw the suspension hard to position, indescribable smell of oil "Chinese" when you open the briefcase, switches fragile-looking ...

Well, all that we do not care, because what counts is the sound!

If we rule préamli correctly, even with a source is a little weak have no breath. The definition is good, not too much acidity in the treble. I do not serve in the neighborhood (still at 2-3 m from the source). This mic I use to have the presence and definition for my registration. A stereo pair located farther back full.

I record with choirs, orchestras and organ. Its good field width is ideal for recording an organ whose buffet several meters wide.

Used once to record vocals for a slideshow. With just one microphone can pick up several people, and the result is very natural. Its wide field eliminates the need of the level changes when a person turns his head slightly.

Obviously, what I just described is probably as good and even better with other pickups ... this is where the concept of value for money: exellent for SC-450!

I use it to take singing and classical guitar.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for over a year and I particularly appreciated.

Surely they must preamps that go with it. I use it with the built-Octane M-Audio Fast Track Ultra is just perfect for my use.

The sound is crisp, clear, direct and present. The record is very good, it does not color (too) the sound does not favor certain frequencies. What can I say?

Pros: sound, low-cut,

Cons: I do not see it fulfills its function.

I put 10 because in its price range, it is perfect is true. Compared to other more expensive mics, but will drop his note this is not the purpose of the notice here.