![Marshall JTM310 [1995-1997]](https://img.audiofanzine.com/img/product/normal/5/5/5520.jpg?fm=pjpg&w=300&h=218&fit=max&s=4db9f3d19a90cf4526974027d33d839e)
View other reviews for this product:
Massimo Romeo
Published on 08/09/05 at 23:30
Amp 30watts lamp, connoisseurs of this type of amplifier will not contradict me:
matter volume, ca DGIG not bad.
lamps:
In pramp 12AX7 (I think there are 4)
2x5881 in amplifier.
pity that the lamps are lamps Chinese origins, I prfr "better".
UTILIZATION
I used about two years. (Concerts and rp)
lamps also make comments to me.
t as he said, the clean is really surprising for a marshall. Fans of big arms JCM800 tattoos tell a true clean is not the vocation of a marshall. Well this amp proves otherwise.
It is obvious that a front fender deluxe for example, more expensive all the same, the clean is much less critallin. But what I liked is the shuffled marshall clean with the grain. O On what his "sandy" as a call to another user.
Rglages are the "can not be simpler."
No manual unless you are mancho (oullllllllala valve 0.5)
SOUNDS
Amp clean sound as I call them, often accepts pedals distortion / fuzz. For my part, I used a Russian Big Muff Pi now l. In concert, the volume knob of the WB (not the car eh
) was used as a booster. It even happened often over the battery and without (big) loss of momentum.
the red channel is really bad for cons, consider adding a distortion even when (50?)
OVERALL OPINION
8 / 10 because
- Effective
- Cheap
- Dynamic
- Simple
- Powerful.
-2 For a good crunch t have nice, the eq is not trsractive my taste (like any marshall ..), the blow lamps Chinese origin is a bit sucks and the loop facade, it's too cheap.
It was my first amp t lamp, I sold it for another and for a marshall head engl blackmore suits me totally. I made a mistake by selling it because I regret it today. Indeed, possder a head for the concerts as well as a combo for more functionalist (from dplacement) is trs INTERESTED.
I'll find a quick rev, I think even plugging in my synth.
matter volume, ca DGIG not bad.
lamps:
In pramp 12AX7 (I think there are 4)
2x5881 in amplifier.
pity that the lamps are lamps Chinese origins, I prfr "better".
UTILIZATION
I used about two years. (Concerts and rp)
lamps also make comments to me.
t as he said, the clean is really surprising for a marshall. Fans of big arms JCM800 tattoos tell a true clean is not the vocation of a marshall. Well this amp proves otherwise.
It is obvious that a front fender deluxe for example, more expensive all the same, the clean is much less critallin. But what I liked is the shuffled marshall clean with the grain. O On what his "sandy" as a call to another user.
Rglages are the "can not be simpler."
No manual unless you are mancho (oullllllllala valve 0.5)
SOUNDS
Amp clean sound as I call them, often accepts pedals distortion / fuzz. For my part, I used a Russian Big Muff Pi now l. In concert, the volume knob of the WB (not the car eh
) was used as a booster. It even happened often over the battery and without (big) loss of momentum. the red channel is really bad for cons, consider adding a distortion even when (50?)
OVERALL OPINION
8 / 10 because
- Effective
- Cheap
- Dynamic
- Simple
- Powerful.
-2 For a good crunch t have nice, the eq is not trsractive my taste (like any marshall ..), the blow lamps Chinese origin is a bit sucks and the loop facade, it's too cheap.
It was my first amp t lamp, I sold it for another and for a marshall head engl blackmore suits me totally. I made a mistake by selling it because I regret it today. Indeed, possder a head for the concerts as well as a combo for more functionalist (from dplacement) is trs INTERESTED.
I'll find a quick rev, I think even plugging in my synth.