All user reviews for the Behringer DJX750

(RCA / XLR

UTILIZATION

use in home and night but it wears very quickly the knob are weak

SOUNDS

a light breeze and the equalizer is

OVERALL OPINION

depui 8 months

I already had other model much less well

I RAPORT money is corect but still fragile

I do not refer the Pup I would turn to the new behringer djx900USB

or to the denon dnx1100

or to the home DJM700/800/900/2000 piopio

Sampling correct, however, on certain title, it will be necessary to thoroughly knob of "XPQ Surround" which can ruin all the returned output Bass! (For securities are recorded / edited in the sound output and not LEFT LEFT / RIGHT)

RCA connectors for each "Lines" and divided into two for each depending on whether the output and LINE / CD / PHONE.

Output MASTER CAR + CAR BOOTH output (second exit) and external FX entered CAR.

TAPE output for recording.

XLR / female microphone jack 6.3 mm + ENTER to preview.
Possibility to set different gains for the microphone or to assign an effect of the table when talking about!

PFL button with blue LED for each + Effects + Mic Lines

UTILIZATION

Mixer instead focused for beginners and club nights alone, it can take good hand in the deejing good level because of its 4 channels read CD / Line or Line / Phone, as well as its 75 built-in effects such as the Bitcrusher, flanger, echo, several filters, phase ... and all this setting on a large scale for each effect.

The button "FX On" is very fragile and does just that with a piece of plastic connected to the electronic card table (I also removed). So do not press too hard, if not be repaired manually.

The manual is completely useless, except for having to learn the number of the desired effect! Yes the effects are ranked number that is selected by turning the knob and pressing (1.5s - 2s) to select it, then drive all retenirs not hearts.

BPM system included digital, enabling when "Sync Lock" is set to give us above the fader (LED color) on movement and speed to change the deck and thus get a good result of timing melt. However this function and useless if you mixed together with a mix of software like VDJ.

SOUNDS

Equalizer effective, however, gain knobs are pretty fragile, so it is necessary to take it easy in the turns.

The XPQ surround and well made to all

The output microphone and made as well, plus the option of lowering the speech in its title automatically if you wish via the knob "TALK".

Monitor preview modes with "Split Stereo or" to separate a preview of the title read in conjunction with, or layered under read, but also the possibility to choose the preview out MASTER or CUE only via the knob "LEVEL".

OVERALL OPINION

My personal opinion, his view is that in a year has mated with my CDJ-400,. it allowed me to integrate myself quickly in the deejing and get used to the future high-end table in four ways.

I was advised for any beginner (e) wishing to start a style of mixing fast enough ryhtme. You will be provided (e) in the evenings and therefore have a range of effects already included in addition to what you already use when you mix via a third-party software such as mixing VDJ.

Is Rack? not
types of RCA and XLR connectors for mic
4 channel 2 auxiliary return 1
section actually very bad (not to buy a box for effect)

UTILIZATION

general configuration be simple
incomplete manual
usual functions be accesible

SOUNDS

equalizer mediocre
and a breath is heard at full volume

OVERALL OPINION

1 ½ years
try to ba model not comparable range dc
the peculiarity that the more it looks like jaime has 800 djm least the same effect has not oditible Plene power
proper value for money
I refferer will help me to choose

Table 4 channels DJ:
- RCA connectors only
- Equalisezr -32
- 1 microphone jack
- Box has built-in effects
- Output returns and tape

UTILIZATION

Simple Apart from the effects section, but with the help of the manual we understand. Sela said the efefts are compared using a djm example. But you get used to it over time.

- -32 Equalizer is quite limited. The buttons can troubleshoot kills, but do not compensate for this lack.

- The connection suffers from the lack of XLR output. The microphone jack not only accepts the possibility of XLR microphone jack 6.35

- knob fragile and not all the same resistance to the touch.
The volume fader is a big nonsense, its position does not help either.

- Talk over correct, XPQ Surround mode can provide a little momentum.

- BPM Counter unusable. The function is to folklore.

SOUNDS

- Equliser too low -32

- Blast from 7-8/10 but not annoying at high volume

- The sound played is correct.

OVERALL OPINION

Child-Max features ... section does not serve a purpose much because very limited bpm counter is a ban and how XPQ surround a small gadget.

The LED cue for example are much too bright.

Lots of little details that make a lot of points quickly negative. If used as a mixer 4 channels without worrying about all those unnecessary details, it is a perfect value for money.
Go for it if you do not give importance to the effect section and the counter bpm.

An effects section is integrated? Yes but difficult to use ...

BPM counter top not ... denotes value too large (about 160 of the 130 ...)

UTILIZATION

Easy to use from the end part ... which is not very well explained ...

SOUNDS

A breath appears when more than 8 on the master ...
Equalizer effective

OVERALL OPINION

<ul class="ul">

For how long have you been using it?

</ul>

I've had a little over a week

<ul class="ul">

What thing do you like most/least about it?

</ul>

+: 1 4voies and cheap !!!-: effects section and the light above the crossfader does not work ...

<ul class="ul">

Did you try many other models before getting this one?

</ul>
I already try numark x6 2voies ... but better quality than the DJX 750
<ul class="ul">

What is your opinion about the value for the price?

</ul>

Well

<ul class="ul">

Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice? ...

</ul>

With the same budget so if the quality of it.

Behringer DJX750

I've had a few days and have used it once in the evening. Not bad for the price but if you must use regular
I would opt for a higher range. Now the value is good and justified! The system is not very bpm
accurate and it is better to use the old system! The ear and the ability to synchronize the "beats" between them ...
Bpm screens thus provide a little help, nothing more ... Regarding effects, I have not yet mastered the trick because the explanations are very explicit. We must therefore try to test and investigate the effects that are suitable ...
Attention to the crossfader ch4 because I often "hang" the master fader volume and good morning and the whistle!
For the microphone, I had to use an adapter jack-xlr and I think it's "loaded"! Or change the microphone cable in opting for the XLR. For the rest, I still use it to speak ...

An effects section is integrated?
yes but you have to get used to it!

UTILIZATION

The manual is clear and sufficient? .
yes, and it is imperative to read the section to find out what effects are effects that correspond to the numbers displayed on the small screen

SOUNDS

The equalizer is it effective?
yes especially the bass!

OVERALL OPINION

For how long have you been using it?
3 months

Did you try many other models before getting this one?
Ecler HAK 380 (good quality sound but no effects)


What thing do you like most/least about it?
The +: ergonomics, robustness, the equalizer, the surround mode
the -: the fader volume, BPM counter

What is your opinion about the value for the price?
excellent

Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice?
Yes, if I have the same budget or I would look more towards the Allen & Heath

hello, I find this deck a lot but a lot of things better now if it was would have been finished completely:
- The cross of the chain 4 and masters are too stuck, he would have to separate them by inserting the effect processor and counters between the two

- The meter are difficult to use even unusable, for a count quite corect scaffold do it manually thanks to the beat assist button

the meter reads 160 when he can not read music, scaffold read the manual before using a minimum deck to include two three interesting feature

- Since the meter is difficult to use, with the function del is just for style

- The effect processor works despite what you think: just drop the cross of the different channels to hear, is after the adjustment of volume, so that it gets really interesting!

- The microphone is boring when it has: only usable on the master output of the table
you have to buy the XLR "$$$$$$( for nothing) "
I think what I di malgrés but misspelling will be really useful.

UTILIZATION

The manual is clear and sufficient?
esplication no effect processor is shown.

The general configuration is simple?
yes

The usual functions are they easily accessible?
lack of space around the cross Masters

Is rack?
I do not think has a flight

For how long have you been using it?
1 I

Did you try many other models before getting this one?
a model there are counter effect: what console newbie!

Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice?
pk no?

How many lanes, bus, auxiliary sends, returns ...)?
4 channels + 1 for the microphone input
3 outputs (Master, Booth and Tape for a return to the recording)

Is rack?
Yes, but you have to buy the fixings.

What type of connectors (RCA Jack, XLR ...)?
All RCA

An effects section is integrated?
Yes, and a BPM counter.

UTILIZATION

The general configuration is simple?
Very, we are quickly comfortable with the routine duties of the beast.
Cons by the BPM counter and the effect section are only gadgets, do not expect to find a DJM-800 (despite the obvious resemblance ^ ^).
BPM counters never get a seat the right tempo, and even when we take them back manually to correct the situation, she quickly returned to anything! It's a shame because Berhinger planned sections of LEDs to indicate via the BPM counter the offset between two pieces, which would have been really helpful.
The effect section on it is really very hard to handle, and do not give much of a fantastic exit ... It increases the volume when the spear, and contains really only two effects drinking ...

SOUNDS

The console is transparent?
Well no, all lanes lowered, it still plays music that joueent on each channel. Well this is not death, it is really that there is no noise to hear that.

She introduced the breath?
Yes, when the table is mounted at full power. Nothing too bad here either, some settings may prevent its ...

The equalizer is it effective? ...
Yes, CUT (do not cut entirely frequencies). on the other hand in bass when the volume pot is a 0 and that the rises, low rises very quickly at once, and then climbs steadily, it is a helping hand to take! ^ ^ '
Buttons are provided to the crossfader for the KILL (entirely cutting frequencies)

OVERALL OPINION

For how long have you been using it?
About 1 year.

What thing do you like most/least about it?
His style +
+ The price

- Its useless gadgets

Did you try many other models before getting this one?
Numark 5000FX, Pioneer DJM 800 and 700, Berhinger DX1000.

What is your opinion about the value for the price?
Very good. It's been a year since I use it (At home, not live, live parcequ'en it does not inspire confidence ^ ^) and there were no worries on it.

Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice?
I would have the same amount of money to invest in a mixer, yes.

Is rack?

Yes, you have to buy the 2 ears Rack (Thomann)

An effects section is integrated?

Yes, early unwieldy, then after a few hours spent on it I find them nice.

How many lanes, bus, auxiliary sends, returns ...)?

View features, Behringer.com

The parametric equalizer is it?

I do not know, "parametric", -32, +12 dB



UTILIZATION

The general configuration is simple?

Yes, a copy of DJM with thrush

The manual is clear and sufficient?

Yes, very brief attention, but LIGHT!

The usual functions are they easily accessible?

No Worries, RAS on this item

Cc: Easy grip + you can quickly enjoy it.


SOUNDS

The console is transparent?

A small blast .. But nothing serious

The equalizer is it effective?

SIR-32dB can be a bit low, should be used after the kill section.

She introduced the breath?

8 yes, but nothing serious for a real enthusiast and for the price!


OVERALL OPINION



* For how long have you been using it?

3 Weeks

Did you try many other models before getting this one?

Digital consoles style "Hercules"

What thing do you like most/least about it?

+ Design, price, sound, ease of use.

- Effects (to improve) after other negative point to see over time, I hope not

What is your opinion about the value for the price?

Very good! Console up to my expectations!

Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice?

Yes for now it suits me very well!!

See above

UTILIZATION



* The general configuration is simple?
a simple table 4voies
* The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
Manual not very clear and sufficient, we not understand the effects by reading the manual


SOUNDS

# The equalizer is it effective? ...
yes, but we must avoid the bpm counters are false, the synchronization of beat too.
# Introduced she breath?
yes a slight hiss

OVERALL OPINION

For how long have you been using it?
June 2009
Did you try many other models before getting this one?
yes, and numark pioneer (1000000fois higher)
What thing do you like most/least about it?
most is its reliability is the most reliable in its price range
the least are the manufacturing quality, the buttons are somewhat resistant plastic, poorly bonded (jme am left with the plastic slider in the hands of the first night)
What is your opinion about the value for the price?
Interestingly enough, it is reasonable 160euros for a table that holds the road well anyway, the best in its price range to 4voies.
Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice? ...
not sure, save and buy a far superior material that start with that. It remains a very good restaurant to start in djing. Now I use a DJM 909, it really has nothing to do.

see details



UTILIZATION

The general configuration is simple?

The configuration could not be more simple, easy to learn, although some functions are unnecessary.

The manual is clear and sufficient? ...

Personally I have not read the manual.

The usual functions are they easily accessible?

Yes, all the basic functions are easily accessible, no say over there

SOUNDS

The console is transparent?
not quite ...

The equalizer is it effective? ...

yes, but it is the only thing I rely on this table (avoid all functions such as BPM counter, effects that I would call unnecessary and horrible)

She introduced the breath?

Yes, quite embarrassing at first, it tends to s'atenuer time.

OVERALL OPINION

For how long have you been using it?

1 year

Did you try many other models before getting this one?

some, but it was the first table well for me.

What thing do you like most/least about it?

Pros: its price and simplicity
Cons: build quality (I've always been afraid that I loose at a party), the blast brought the effects, BPM counter useless ...

What is your opinion about the value for the price?

For this price you can not ask for much ... there's something for our money ... However, for those who start and who have a tight budget, it can be done by hand, but as soon as you can afford it, change it!

Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice? ...
No, I'd rather ruin me a bit to take something that makes sense rather than having to change rapidly, however, it works and to start, and considering the price, you can go.

Is rack?
Yes, 19 "with an adapter to buy more.

What type of connectors (RCA Jack, XLR ...)?
Only the RCA.

How many lanes, bus, auxiliary sends, returns ...)?
There are four entrance.

UTILIZATION

The general configuration is simple?
Yes

The manual is clear and sufficient?
I did not open.

The usual functions are they easily accessible?
Yes.


SOUNDS

The equalizer is it effective? ...
Not very efficient.

She introduced the breath?
Yes, Only if we go beyond the 8 or 9, sometimes on the master.


OVERALL OPINION

For how long have you been using it?
Few months.

Did you try many other models before getting this one?
No, this is my first table mix.

What thing do you like most/least about it?
Most:
The price-
-Ease of use
-Design

Minimum:
The breath-above 8

What is your opinion about the value for the price?
Good

Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice?
With the same budget so if I think buying a model above

An effects section is integrated? yes my no.

UTILIZATION


* The general configuration is simple? yes
* The usual functions are they easily accessible? yes
* The manual is clear and sufficient? yes



SOUNDS



* Introduced she breath? yes

The table requires to push down the bass and treble and midrange



OVERALL OPINION

For how long have you been using it? 2 me.
Did you try many other models before getting this one? not see it my all in a row that has entered the range.
What thing do you like most/least about it? C 4 most votes and its price. the least breath and sound much too steep.
# What is your opinion about the value for the price? good fast to give my desire to move on.
# Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice? Certainly not.