The most interresting:
-Self-powered via USB
The knobs and faders, rotary (gnial with virtual instruments)
-Templates

UTILIZATION

Daily the PCR-50 is effective trs, except that it is noisy and rvle trs long unreliable!
I have now for two years and two buttons (C) who died while the use n'tait not heavy! Dception big on that! If one were to me it would change the preferences against a PCR-M50 (even if I prfre gray mtal the PCR-50, which fits well with my PowerBook) .
The worst is that I disassemble the keyboard and the problem does not seem to be really original mcanique! Contactors in rubber and carbon contacts do not appear to uss and for good reason ...

OVERALL OPINION

APRS 2 years of service low-intensity, the PCR-50 is failing me. While it seemed promising.
However, I was able to do good but with zic from Roland, I could expect more reliable.
The report QualitPrix allchant dpart to be so rvle mdiocre!
At the same era I would do probably this choice because the only offer these c'tait CHARACTERISTICS but probably not today. But I want to do even with the confidence Roland PCR-M50 appears to have t seen the rise in terms of quality and function ...

I'll see if my dealer offered me a recovery against the latter.