tweak « Very good and compact »
Published on 06/29/10 at 08:46I use it since December 2009.
Before I had a Soundcraft M8.
I am very satisfied. For 1300 € with fly I used 24 tracks, EQ that work well without too dephasing the signal as my old M8, especially they are semi-parametric, instead of 6 to 4, and 4 stereo groups plus a matrix and saw 4 meter ledpar slice, no breath and a much better sound quality.
I won print punch, presence, clarity.
What I like most is the EQ, the number of channels for a very satisfactory quality, a compact footprint while having the place to work and the ability to route each track is in a group to be in either the bus master.
The least, well frankly, I do not know quite what to reproach him. I would like more space for my fingers, MIDI controllable automation and AUX with full parametric EQ now that I've tasted!
With experience, according to my budget, my space and my current needs, I will ever be the same choice. If I had more space I'll take a GL3300 or GS3000
Before I had a Soundcraft M8.
I am very satisfied. For 1300 € with fly I used 24 tracks, EQ that work well without too dephasing the signal as my old M8, especially they are semi-parametric, instead of 6 to 4, and 4 stereo groups plus a matrix and saw 4 meter ledpar slice, no breath and a much better sound quality.
I won print punch, presence, clarity.
What I like most is the EQ, the number of channels for a very satisfactory quality, a compact footprint while having the place to work and the ability to route each track is in a group to be in either the bus master.
The least, well frankly, I do not know quite what to reproach him. I would like more space for my fingers, MIDI controllable automation and AUX with full parametric EQ now that I've tasted!
With experience, according to my budget, my space and my current needs, I will ever be the same choice. If I had more space I'll take a GL3300 or GS3000