All user reviews for the Mackie CFX20

Very very good food.
Easily adjustable like all Mackie mixers.
We use it in Live for the group, the subgroups that are useful
mix for battery on one side and guitar-keyboards on the other.
The equalization responds very well, the effects built into the table are quite valuable, especially
effects reverb for vocals (lead and backing vocals), c a beautiful product that does not cost that.

The only problem if there were only a c Mackie does not provide the Rack (also in exist? Mystery ....) For the rest I prefer to see the output on the top that has the back, it's easier and faster to install ...

UTILIZATION

The manual helps to detail the settings with several visual config.

SOUNDS

No breath, nickel equalization, nice job at Mackie.

OVERALL OPINION

1 YEAR

Formerly several tables including BEHRINGER (nothing to do with)
and SPIRIT LIVE (not bad, but less efficient)

Console 20 channels, four buses, two return paths, two paths for effects dpart
connector jack, XLR and two RCA
a qualiseur Settings, an effect section Intgr

UTILIZATION

The manual is clear enough, the best practice is and what ct believe me you will not.
this table is fairly simple to use.

SOUNDS

The pramplis are trs bons.Aucun breath signaler.l 'equalizer is trs efficace.Attention all rglages are extremely sensitive.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 2 years in an orchestra.
I like the sound of pramplis, the hypermarkets are rglages prcis.2 left and right outputs, an output sub I use 2 boxes with mackie.
the internal effects section does not serve me and is also somewhat limit my eyes.
I love the management of sub-groups
frankly not much fault with this table (as often in mackie)
report qualitprix impeccable
I can only advise

I will not rpter in less everything that can be found on the website of Mackie.
Come on, here's the gist:
-20 Tracks or 16 tracks plutt mono + 2 Stereo tracks, perfect for keyboards or expanders
-Connections: 16 + 2 * 2 XLR jacks for Stereo tracks
-An equalizer per paramtrique
-Equalizer with a full band for gnral.
-Effects processor Intgr (OR rverbe time limit or chorus), worse than any effects processor spar but very practical.

UTILIZATION

I use it in a "live" and it works well every time trs.
The only big "BMOL" Only two auxiliary dparts. For returns is too small for a console that can accommodate many people. Three would be much better dj (I put 9), four great (I made 10!), Etc.., Ect.

SOUNDS

So the sound: I love it. In fact, what j'apprcie most is the high rev Fidler compared to sounds (keyboards, guitar, microphone) that fall into this console.
I had two DJ consoles before the-l: A Samick (must start), then a Yamaha (not bad), and finally this one.
By the way, here is my "mthode" to evaluate the sound: I have my keyboard connected to my console, I plug in a headset first on the keyboard and the console and I compare the two sounds obtained: with Samick, c'tait of breath, the breath and the breath and wave his derrire. With Yamaha, dj much less breath and even when his hair "transformquot;. With the Mackie, Magic: The sound is almost the same, and I do not even know if one can speak of breath so it is discreet. Impressive.
I will be 10 when the sound exactly the same!

OVERALL OPINION

It's going to make more than 5 years since I use it, and I do not intend to change, because in this price range, I see nothing else.
What j'apprcie most: its transparency, lack of breath, and her little rverbe intgre that even if it is not (by far) the best, is sufficient to handle voice without having to lug around an external effect that we must plug / unplug each concert.
What j'apprcie minimum: Too few dparts auxiliary. Frankly, a lack.
I put 10 if it had more dparts, here!

If it fails one day, I Rasht the same is sr.

-Not to rack (too large)
There is no oversampling analog
Effects built-yes.
Automa-WHAT? lol
The synchro-Riggs / Murtaugh better known as "three or ... we go?"

UTILIZATION

Hyper Single

No manual needed

yes it is easy to access

SOUNDS

The preamp and not blow a bit, there is a high pass ...
EQ has a semi-parametric filter and 2 Tea.
4 in which an intern, a post and 2 pre / post it was quite good in view of the foregoing.
Fader short :-( (too sensitive)
There are 4 groups Stereos mono or 2 for you to see but there is no NPA for these groups is a switch for "hard panning" (my apologies to the French Academy but if it has come to express ca in less than 10 letters amends Article I) (LEFT / RIGHT / LEFT + RIGHT) mwouais ...

The internal effects I must confess that I have not used.

OVERALL OPINION

Long enough to have been around ...

Not acquired, used and yes bcp other models.

The Minus: EQs / blast / group assignments
More on: uh will the EQ output but really to fill the box eh ...

Not paid, not know the price but probably better value for money than Midas. I would say the same if I were to compare my car to a Lamborghini ...
Midas is the Lamborghini so eh



TO SUMMARIZE:
It is a small console entry simple enough for the anti-digital, it's easy, it's cheap and it can ... oh no sorry ...

I use it in conference and today I would prefer a 96 or 01V or an LS9 16ch ILIVE ...

It passed but if you know nothing digital is nickel.
Ideal for keyboards or line level machines brief but if you plan to record instrumentals with acoustic pickups, drop it blows and there bcp better these days ...