Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
  • Increase or decrease font size
  • Print
  • RSS

All user reviews for the Revox A77

  • Like
  • Tweet
  • Submit
Average Score:4.5( 4.5/5 based on 8 reviews )
 1 user review13 %
 1 user review13 %
Not satisfied with those reviews?
joelmarc11/02/2014

joelmarc's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" For me, mixed feelings"

Revox A77
I have some Revox I fully restored (A77, B77, G36)
I find the A77 aurally and mechanically less efficient, and more complicated
troubleshoot the B77, even if the heads are identical and therefore engines:
if you have a choice between A77 and B77 at the same price, I highly recommend the B77.
for me, an A77 that it does not reach operating suffers actual "update" capacitors, or a calibration standard with tape should not be sold over 100 euros ....
lezed-suisse09/14/2014

lezed-suisse's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" REVOX A77"

Revox A77
I love this camera
I also own B-77 and PR-99
lezed-Swiss
gama210111/26/2013

gama2101's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Very good magneto!"

Revox A77
Hello, I have used several Revox, the A77 is one of the most robust and easy to use.
We must ensure the good condition of rollers, shafts coil heads playback and recording, knobs sometimes crack and check if there is no wow because in this case is that it has greatly served ...
Bocris09/10/2013

Bocris's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" thank you kindly clarify speeds."

Revox A77
Hellos all,
This is just a note, for pity, well thank you want to put in your ads revox
the speeds of your devices has Vitera we waste time searching for hours,
Unit-if your type matches the search speed, because too often even with a magnifying glass looking at the pictures it is illegible, and we abyss eyes, cordially.
orion_4306/03/2013

orion_43's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" An "indestructible" very musical instrument and"

Revox A77
I used my Revox A77 MKII for over 30 years and intensively than before the first signs of fatigue.
Revox at the time of my purchase, it was first the reliability and this reputation was confirmed over the years. Too bad the VU meters do not work in reading. But that does not affect the sound quality.
Before I had a tape from a German brand but that was far from giving me the results of the Revox. It must be said, however, that the price of Revox was significantly higher than the machine it replaced. Anyway, for me, the value for money remained still for the Revox.
At the time I bought my A77 my financial resources were limited, for reasons of economy so I opted for a 4-track 9,5 / 19 cm / s. This desire to save the band was a big mistake. You do not buy a sports car for fuel savings. Today I read my coils 4 tracks with a B77 MKII and I make my new record with two tracks B77 MKII 19/38 cm / s. What say except that when used on a Revox not look elsewhere machine of her dreams.
philrud03/25/2012

philrud's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" What a pleasure to listen, how natural!"

Revox A77
For 2 years I listen, but I had had an approximately 20 ans.Pourquoi ago I picked up a? Because I have mixed tapes of my vinyl 80 'and I wanted one for read them or even put them in digital.
Of course by now, we have gone digital, but we must not forget that bands have given us a sacred listening pleasure for years even with their qualities of natural défauts.Mais tuned we are often forget the known defects of this analogue there.
For the price: we are proud to have a machine of a certain quality and robustness considered.
philrud03/25/2012

philrud's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" What a pleasure to listen, how natural!"

Revox A77
For 2 years I listen, but I got one there about 20 ans.Pourquoi I picked one? Because I have my band mixes vinyl 80 years' and I wanted one to read them or even put them into digital.
Of course by now, we pass into digital, but do not omit the strips have fun Procur sacred listening to us for years even with their dfauts.Mais the qualities of the natural cost us do often forget the known defects of this analog l.
For the price: we are proud to have a machine of a certain quality and robustness rpute.
dlespera07/31/2007

dlespera's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Revox A77
I knew well what magntophone. It's perfect.

If you propose one, verify the brakes (in grinding arrtant fast rewind of a large plateau NAB). It's their weak point but it is OPG / fit. Verify the wear of the heads and the state of the counter. A counter dfectueux is not a big problem and is part of normal wear. Uses require heads of 200-300 if you tinker if not go your way or treat 50.

IDAL for the quality of recording is to obtain the semi-pro MODEL 19/38 cm dual-track (recording on a single cot in the band). Unfortunately they are quite rare. The MODEL arguably until 6 Db-tape pro: the dynamics will be great.

In my opinion, Avoid the massacre that the quality Dolby sound. And there is no point to use strips of poor quality 9.5 cm / sec - the purchase of A77 is not so not worth it.