View other reviews for this product:
Budha bass
Published on 05/13/06 at 05:53
See the site the subject line 6.
I miss an exit numrique "optical" to make me happy!
UTILIZATION
For me, nothing too complicated!
I have the manual in English, but am pretty "fluent" in English so good ...
A French version is available I believe in more.
lack may be more clarification on cetain dtails techniques (but looking for the small box)
SOUND QUALITY
I did not post notice before because I did not know what to think.
I had the opportunity to do a concert not long ago and in another group, bassist used the SVT head modlise (perfect state and Anne: 1974, j ' No not even shut!)
curious to know what was worth my pod, I asked if we could test to see the difference, of course, accept it and thank him again.
in test pod + power amp in cabinet and SVT810
SVT head + cabinet SVT810: this seemed equivalent: big astonishment from us both.
then another test:
+ + pregnant SVT810 head back with a SM57 microphone (I'm not sure) on the right channel sound
pod (modlisation SVT + + SVT810 20 cardioid microphone on the left channel of sound.
We placed approximately in the center, silent trs it difficult to see how silent the "real" from "false"
which is also on is that this thing modlisation qualque diffrent compared
SVT rcente a head. Proof if any REALLY need compared with the same original annes.car an SVT head rcente does not sound like an SVT head in 1974.
supporting evidence!
(Unlike the view of Thom_bass, do not just test the presets as they are via a qualis qualiseur dbray internal need of some effects, compressor and speaker mod read too. preset classic rock-not be a cmodlisation prtends by SVT, but his is a "bidouillquot; s'insre that mix well in a rock and no more.
you really have any dbray effects, modlisations, and others to hear what must be understood: the modlisation by itself.
For cons, I do not know what it is other modlisations, so I left a post on the forum so that other li give their rsultast with such tests.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for over 2 years now. Before I thought it had good sound,
but not really think that modlisations taient Fidler, especially as I have lamp prampli cot ...
Now APRS having at least one test, I can say that if I seek a well SPECIFICATIONS I could trust it ...
I tried other models modlisation: The Rocktron bluethunder, not too bad recording but sound too digital and did not convince me (prt by another bassist who sold in time before I myself shall decide, and then bass V-amp pro
which ignores my guitar (he used to make an impact on a keyboard) and I test: it is a scam! I could never draw a pleasant sound!
always a story of a comprmis between saturates, it is a brilliant dribble of crap ... etc)
report quality / price pod: I find it correct.
I would do, and this choice is a good product trs, trs soucis.et reliable and yet I walk.
I miss an exit numrique "optical" to make me happy!
UTILIZATION
For me, nothing too complicated!
I have the manual in English, but am pretty "fluent" in English so good ...
A French version is available I believe in more.
lack may be more clarification on cetain dtails techniques (but looking for the small box)
SOUND QUALITY
I did not post notice before because I did not know what to think.
I had the opportunity to do a concert not long ago and in another group, bassist used the SVT head modlise (perfect state and Anne: 1974, j ' No not even shut!)
curious to know what was worth my pod, I asked if we could test to see the difference, of course, accept it and thank him again.
in test pod + power amp in cabinet and SVT810
SVT head + cabinet SVT810: this seemed equivalent: big astonishment from us both.
then another test:
+ + pregnant SVT810 head back with a SM57 microphone (I'm not sure) on the right channel sound
pod (modlisation SVT + + SVT810 20 cardioid microphone on the left channel of sound.
We placed approximately in the center, silent trs it difficult to see how silent the "real" from "false"
which is also on is that this thing modlisation qualque diffrent compared
SVT rcente a head. Proof if any REALLY need compared with the same original annes.car an SVT head rcente does not sound like an SVT head in 1974.
supporting evidence!
(Unlike the view of Thom_bass, do not just test the presets as they are via a qualis qualiseur dbray internal need of some effects, compressor and speaker mod read too. preset classic rock-not be a cmodlisation prtends by SVT, but his is a "bidouillquot; s'insre that mix well in a rock and no more.
you really have any dbray effects, modlisations, and others to hear what must be understood: the modlisation by itself.
For cons, I do not know what it is other modlisations, so I left a post on the forum so that other li give their rsultast with such tests.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for over 2 years now. Before I thought it had good sound,
but not really think that modlisations taient Fidler, especially as I have lamp prampli cot ...
Now APRS having at least one test, I can say that if I seek a well SPECIFICATIONS I could trust it ...
I tried other models modlisation: The Rocktron bluethunder, not too bad recording but sound too digital and did not convince me (prt by another bassist who sold in time before I myself shall decide, and then bass V-amp pro
which ignores my guitar (he used to make an impact on a keyboard) and I test: it is a scam! I could never draw a pleasant sound!
always a story of a comprmis between saturates, it is a brilliant dribble of crap ... etc)
report quality / price pod: I find it correct.
I would do, and this choice is a good product trs, trs soucis.et reliable and yet I walk.