Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Joemeek SixQ reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Joemeek SixQ
Images
1/113
Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
b2croix b2croix
Published on 05/05/06 at 08:25
Ay I reu essay ... and then by what we start ...

First, it is the mono version of TwinQ (exactly the same, except no AES / EBU output here)

The look: Green bottle wise enough (I preferred the more flashy green Joemeek of yesteryear but it's more chic british l.
The knobs are plastic but they look strong, and the race is trs agrble and rglages prcis. All selectors are equipped with LEDs of different colors (green, yellow, blue), handy. Ergonomics Good visual trs!

Connectivity super complte: there is everything!
Between an XLR bal., A jack between assym instr., A line between sym., A symbol entry. ("Channel 2 analog input" in the "digital interface", I not really know what ca is, the wise hello!), an insert (convenient to use the compressor and the eq on a table), 1 output anal. XLR bal., 1 output jack assym. / sym., 1 output anal. jack (-10 / +4 dB), 1 SPDIF, 1 Optical Output OUF ... that's it!

In terms of selectors, iya lot of stuff: 48V, "IRON" an additional gain of 4 dB, a 20 dB pad, a phase inverter, a "pre Meter" (handy for calibrating the gain of ), a "high pass filter" for the vocal mic (pop, wheezing) and so on.
In digital, the beast the gre 44, 48, 88, 96 kHz (enough!)

ITS now (finally).
Well, what about ... just a ring!
I have a BLUETUBE, uh how to say is crap! Not without being mean is not that great ct.
Without EQ and compressor without the better dj sixQ rings (more air, more accurate, musical). Then we do what we want. Were stained, a little madness, not at all.
First, the EQ, it blows a little above 5 kHz but I balance it is so musical, and the breath I had. I rediscovered the sounds on my new GREAT (acoust. and electr.) More friendly, and presents with soft mediums (nothing to do with those pesky plug in nazillards dgeus), the pretty sharp metal and never aggressive (nothing to do with those pesky plug in numriques dgeus, zero ...), deep bass and sweet (nothing to do with those pesky plug in drooling, dgeus, zero ..., name name!). In short, the EQ I feel that I do not spend more (grate the headphone first and APRS on monitors).
The optical compressor. Ae the slap, I love, yet please!! It's warm, ultra ractif, granular, discrete (or to be intrusive) is sixties, seventies, it is all thanks to rglages complete (this is the first time that by adjusting the attack and the release really hear the difference (again in comparison with those of *%@&#-<$ plug in my "Tuuuuut"). Same here are stained or not, as we want (guitar, vocals bass perc, everything sounds is gnial!). rglages Beware when even he must be super thin and take your time (h is compressed so taken here). Especially the release (no empty manage depending on the source) and the threshold (not too abused at the door if it's really too aggressive)
Well here I can talk on and on but I think it's a good glimpse.

The only worry:
- I want to buy one for deuxime see that it has no battery.
- So I see even larger https://fr.audiofanzine.com/produits/avis/index, ProductID, 29795.html, h yes, it must give serious but it is 10 times more expensive (for two years may be)

Well here is the conclusion to mono recordings of voices, acoustic guitars, electric bass, percussion, violin or sax (not tried), I think it's the best (by far) over his / price. Sr Although there are better but all need in this price range, I dfie anyone to offer me the alternative ... (there are not drops!). I await your ractions, and has more good zikouse!

UTILIZATION

Lol

SOUND QUALITY

Lol

OVERALL OPINION

Lol