View other reviews for this product:
evansien
Published on 10/14/07 at 06:12
Piano 88 keys, 14 sounds, can put them in layer (2 shuffled instruments) or split. Programmable reverb and chorus effects. Connectivity noon (in + out), USB, headphone, line, pedals (sustain + expression). Bass and treble EQ. Possibility of use as a keyboard matre.
UTILIZATION
APRS two years of use, I rvis my opinion on this point. No worries about the functions available which are generally well thought out.
The real problem comes from the touch that seemed to me yet honorable quality in the first place, considering the price of the instrument. However, when used in concert, I felt a great difficulty getting anything by playing the keyboard, o fatigue and frustration. I do not know more than this since I changed my keyboard (Roland FP4). In addition, two keys broke down despite the fact that I did not use the instrument of intensive Manir trs.
SOUNDS
The sounds are overall quality of average, Rhodes is not bad. However, the sound of the piano (usually the most used is well below the concurrency and lack of punch, which, combined with the default of touch, becomes a real problem.
OVERALL OPINION
I ream the piano for two years and wish rviser the first notice I had given on this instrument.
It is suitable for use in keyboard matre complment or as an acoustic piano to work in silence.
However, it is not appropriate at all because its a concert utlisation default accumulate too many: this keyboard is cumbersome, unreliable (others have confirmed that they experienced problem), the Touch is approximate, it s'abme quickly because of a medium finish, the piano sound is bland.
The Ralite is that it seems difficult trs this award to a sufficient quality piano. I encourage you dpenser supplmentaires few hundred dollars to see The models in the Korg, Roland and Yamaha are on top of it all levels.
If you can not afford, The models of Casio seem a good alternative to the keyboard as well as n'tant forcment not a must (like the M-Audio prtend in its pubs for the ProKeys), they are more homognes.
UTILIZATION
APRS two years of use, I rvis my opinion on this point. No worries about the functions available which are generally well thought out.
The real problem comes from the touch that seemed to me yet honorable quality in the first place, considering the price of the instrument. However, when used in concert, I felt a great difficulty getting anything by playing the keyboard, o fatigue and frustration. I do not know more than this since I changed my keyboard (Roland FP4). In addition, two keys broke down despite the fact that I did not use the instrument of intensive Manir trs.
SOUNDS
The sounds are overall quality of average, Rhodes is not bad. However, the sound of the piano (usually the most used is well below the concurrency and lack of punch, which, combined with the default of touch, becomes a real problem.
OVERALL OPINION
I ream the piano for two years and wish rviser the first notice I had given on this instrument.
It is suitable for use in keyboard matre complment or as an acoustic piano to work in silence.
However, it is not appropriate at all because its a concert utlisation default accumulate too many: this keyboard is cumbersome, unreliable (others have confirmed that they experienced problem), the Touch is approximate, it s'abme quickly because of a medium finish, the piano sound is bland.
The Ralite is that it seems difficult trs this award to a sufficient quality piano. I encourage you dpenser supplmentaires few hundred dollars to see The models in the Korg, Roland and Yamaha are on top of it all levels.
If you can not afford, The models of Casio seem a good alternative to the keyboard as well as n'tant forcment not a must (like the M-Audio prtend in its pubs for the ProKeys), they are more homognes.