HP800 classified ad
New ad alertRoland HP800 forums
Images
Reviews
4.0/5(2 reviews)
100 %
Write a user review
Tib-tibPublished on 12/12/03 at 15:28 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Buy in 1988, like most ke ... a real keyboard heavy to the touch, "carry a very heavy even" very good piano touch my father bought me in this condition, it should have a touch piano k'il it was worth 9,000 francs At the time I'm used not present for the 6 sounds but always feel, yes I do it again this choice
UTILIZATION
N / A
SOUNDS
N / A
OVERALL OPINION
N / A
UTILIZATION
N / A
SOUNDS
N / A
OVERALL OPINION
N / A
00
»
minimumvitalPublished on 06/18/07 at 08:01 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
This piano is incorrectly classified in the "electric piano".
It is of course a digital piano, one of the first worthy of the name, bought for me in 1989 if I remember correctly.
It is very heavy, but the keyboard quality is neither too hard nor too light.
At the sound, it is mainly for its piano sound "classic" (samples), which still holds the road today despite the years, even if it does not compete with what can KAWAI now.
In particular, the effect of brightness depending on the velocity is very well made and quite realistic.
The sound is far superior to that of a clavinova the same time (for an example), which frankly no one seems in comparison.
UTILIZATION
N / A
It is of course a digital piano, one of the first worthy of the name, bought for me in 1989 if I remember correctly.
It is very heavy, but the keyboard quality is neither too hard nor too light.
At the sound, it is mainly for its piano sound "classic" (samples), which still holds the road today despite the years, even if it does not compete with what can KAWAI now.
In particular, the effect of brightness depending on the velocity is very well made and quite realistic.
The sound is far superior to that of a clavinova the same time (for an example), which frankly no one seems in comparison.
UTILIZATION
N / A
Read more
This piano is incorrectly classified in the "electric piano".
It is of course a digital piano, one of the first worthy of the name, bought for me in 1989 if I remember correctly.
It is very heavy, but the keyboard quality is neither too hard nor too light.
At the sound, it is mainly for its piano sound "classic" (samples), which still holds the road today despite the years, even if it does not compete with what can KAWAI now.
In particular, the effect of brightness depending on the velocity is very well made and quite realistic.
The sound is far superior to that of a clavinova the same time (for an example), which frankly no one seems in comparison.
UTILIZATION
N / A
SOUNDS
N / A
OVERALL OPINION
N / A
It is of course a digital piano, one of the first worthy of the name, bought for me in 1989 if I remember correctly.
It is very heavy, but the keyboard quality is neither too hard nor too light.
At the sound, it is mainly for its piano sound "classic" (samples), which still holds the road today despite the years, even if it does not compete with what can KAWAI now.
In particular, the effect of brightness depending on the velocity is very well made and quite realistic.
The sound is far superior to that of a clavinova the same time (for an example), which frankly no one seems in comparison.
UTILIZATION
N / A
SOUNDS
N / A
OVERALL OPINION
N / A
See less
00
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Roland
- Model: HP800
- Series: HP
- Category: Digital Pianos
- Added in our database on: 12/15/2003
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other categories in Pianos & Organs
Other names: hp 800