Reloop RHP-10

I used this headset for a year, I changed to a HDJ500

I had sennheiser, pionneer, wesc, beats

strong point: sound quality Balese, interchangeable cuffs, price
weak point: heavy and stuffy quickly unpleasant

context: clubs, parties, mixes

headband too tight on the ears and around the neck and choking quickly becomes cumbersome.

Solid plastic joints for the

I mixed mainly electro

very comfortable to wear the first half hour, good sense of isolation with cuffs with small hole.

interchangeable cables are very engaged and robust.

the headphone is solid, the cables are detachable.

with time, a little gold paint and party and a golden ring decoration delaminated.

great sound quality, it does not mess up too ears with false frequencies that can be found in other brands.

I use it for 3 years, bought blind urgent need for a headset. since I have bought a marshall major headphones that I have chosen in the middle of half a dozen headphone the same price range of a hundred euros. and despite this second headphone very good in terms of fidelity rendering, I go back sometimes and even often the reloop to listen to my mixes.

It is especially great for listening to electro, and thus for djing.
with a very nice dynamic restitution that actually does not saturate the leaves, its level.
Actually there is no need to put too much listening to relevant and covers the ears well even if in the long run, the advantage becomes inconvenient. Let me explain this headphone was apparently designed to bend in all directions with the atria to the place, and even backwards through the head. You can jump and dance on the head, it does not fall .. (Great for cycling) And so the headband is VERY tight, so that when it is placed on the head normally, after a while it relies too much on the top of the ears and it can hurt .
level I personally find his balance without any benefit frequency spectrum, with just a very good dynamic response. Well to get an idea of ​​rendering a sound, maybe not monitoring.


value for money is excellent, because I personally have dragged everywhere, took a trip in my bags without caring at all and no pete, nothing. the dissatisfaction with the quality did not have the chance to fall on the same production series that has moi.ou then reloop can be done economies piece of string later on finitions.je not know.

if I had to make this choice I do it again because at this price, listening is really nice.

I did that for about 8 months.

I try a lot of reference MODEL: 1000 HDJ, HD25, AKG and Technics.

The sound is excellent for mixing, powerful, with a linear plutt lgre in the lower back. Isolates of the collection's outdoor trs well, fairly comfortable foam, spiral cable.

I like the least quality manufacturing, plastic and fragile trs (dj glued), shakes the head a lot (- for costs on long-term)

At the sound quality excellent price (nearly level with the HD25)
At the manufacturing level, we must be careful .. trs

With exprience, I would do not have that choice, because in heavy use I doubt it lasts more than two years ..

<ul class="ul">

For how long have you been using it? 2 months

Did you try many other models before getting this one? Yes, smaller headphones rather low quality, that is bound to put the volume up in the evening. With this one, nothing to see, it is very much one and two, the bass quality is second to none, I had the impression of rediscovering songs that I play.

What thing do you like most/least about it? The power and design, all those I've tested is approved. Furthermore, I can mix with custom caps. The combination is perfect. And the composition is the same, no need to turn the sound too loud to hear. It follows, even on a big system. Consumed in moderation (ie not block!) No twist no ears, even on prolonged use. What I like least ... uh ... you'll understand ... nothing! It's perfect!

What is your opinion about the value for the price? Excellent, it works well for limited budget (about 80). A good investment

With experience, you do again this election, with such price and such good quality, I'd do it again, but I think it's solid before I change ... will go to ruin, therefore, urge 'em.

</ul>