All user reviews for the Beyerdynamic M 201 TG
|5 reviews||50 %|
|5 reviews||50 %|
Some instruments in your studio or on stage are hard to microphone up because of the space around the instrument and it could be a tight squeeze in order to get a microphone back there. The M 201 TG is a slim microphone that can reach back to those hard to reach places. This microphone also does a great job of not interfering with your speakers and monitors because it has a special coil design. It will allow you to have it very close to all of your gear without it causing issues to your other gear or audio quality.
This is a great hypercardioid polar pattern microphone, it has a 3 pin connector and a well built frame. The M 201 TG should hold up for a long time and be your tuff to reach places microphone especially in a cramped studio like ours or small stage where all of the gear might be crammed together. We do not use this microphone all the time but it is great to have it for some situations. The sound is crystal clear no matter what you record with it. If the price was a little less we would probably purchased a couple of these. BeyerDynamic has always made great microphones but for some reason I feel they overpriced this one just a little bit. If you have the money to spend, check out the TG V90r by BeyerDynamic.
2 of 2 people found this review helpful
JimboSpins's review"Very Versatile "
We have used this microphone for around 2 years, it sounds great for some of the Pearl Kits that we used it on and for the snare it brought out that rock “wetness” of the snare we where looking for at the time. When it comes to versatile microphones there are a bunch of them out on the market including the SM57, but the Beyerdynamic M 201 TG will make the SM 57 sound horrible in sound test. We are happy with our purchase of the M 201 and hope that it will continue to last us a long time like it has already. The sound quality is amazing and all for an affordable price.
Audiofanzine FR's review
See manufacturer's features.
- How long have you been using it?
- Which feature do you like the most / the least?
Ultra versatile, like a SM57 but much better!
It's the best mic I found for a rock or heavy metal snare.
Also great to record distortion and crunch guitars.
- Did you try any other models before buying it?
SM57, Beta 56, Audix I5, etc.
- How would you rate its value for money?
There is no big difference in price compared to a SM57.
- Based on your experience, would you buy this product again?
I own two. If I could I would buy a truckload of them!!!
Slipmurd's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Good price / quality ratio!"
I use it for several months now. I bought a little trusting to the reputation of the brand. I had a microphone in the style of SM57, but hey that's the seen and the seen, everyone has one, I needed to get out of the "standard Shure" that everyone follows a few by default.
I love its versatility: I used to catch harmonica (for the technical side, he was placed at + / - 15 cm of the instrument, not really in line. It was "coupled "a Sennheiser E835 (type SM58 microphone), up against the gate, to Toots Thielemans. mixing of the two gave a surprisingly good result!).
It is also very effective in front of a good amp (I play on an Orange Tiny Terror with the small cabinet of the same brand), preferably in line, close enough to the speaker (but please try to place in 50taine of an inch if you have a room with too much reverb dégeulasse, rendering can be pretty, according to the desired effect!)
It may give not too bad on a snare drum effect. It can help in sound, but there are still j'pense best to properly transplant a snare ... That said, as he readily accepts high level of intensity, it can be very convenient for everything percussion!
I also had to record a glockenspiel (kind of small métalophone without resonator tube below), a big microphone on 20taine cm from the top, off center, slightly askew, very very conclusive results, while the instrument in question not necessarily sounded good at the base.
The voice goes pretty well, have to manage the proximity effect. Do not forget the pop filter of course. For the price, it's really not bad to have too much bad voice, both spoken than sung.
SPEAKING OF PROXIMITY EFFECT: it is HUGE on this microphone, tape 10 dB below 200Hz for a near 1 cm, 6 dB for close to 10cm, and it is only at a just under a meter that is beginning to have a frequency response approximately neutral.
This feature is not really annoying in taking on his amp, or when the microphone is not used very close, but personally I am not yet reached to get it right with an acoustic guitar, sound does I think not at all balanced when looking for a plan similar to guitar. It becomes so when you put the microphone of a 50taine cm, it looks pretty good, but it's at all the desired effect!
The same applies to voice, and this is also where you see that it is not done. But hey, managing just the EQ properly, it becomes correct.
I also did some experiments on bass amp, not super convincing, but with a good amp to 100 € and an old Ibanez which is not worth much, it's always hard to have something correct.
I think with the same budget I would do this choice, except with regard to the acoustic guitar (although one day perhaps I will find the position that miracle that it sounds), it makes me good service. As already said, I find it also has a fairly low output level, I owe a lot to push the preamp to get something decent.
8 of 8 people found this review helpful
Anonymous 's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" the best in its category"
I have 4 years
Yes I try not bad, but that price is the best
He buried the 57 hands down
3 of 11 people found this review helpful
pierre7's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Among the very best dynamic!"
Used for three months. I had many other dynamics (mid range).
I was astonished by the fidelity of voice restoration.
I used to sound with an altar in a church because he
is quite discreet and not brittle, and the sound coming out the speakers (of
Fostex studio monitors) was that of the speaker, without staining, we
only had the impression that he was closer.
I will not say it is more accurate than a good static, but I never
course also true dynamics.
I also like the strength, quality of making his (accurate) even remotely.
It can be used for almost anything.
on the other hand it is sensitive to manipulations, the output level is low and I
seems that other newer pickups are more resistant to feedback.
In the category of discrete dynamic microphones I have not found better,
value for money is very good (it is good 2 sm57!) and I think
buy a new one.
6 of 7 people found this review helpful
afrohair2004's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Excellent dynamic"
Used recently in the studio.
A snare: very good, punch, precision, placed at 8 or 9 inches from the drum.
Before a guitar amp: really excellent, heat, definition, balance, I think the EQ is downright useless for mixing; placed the center of HP, in the axis, 1 cm from the grid.
So far, by far, the best dynamic mic I've used.
7 of 7 people found this review helpful
moise69's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
57 to the side, he can not hear anything!
For the price nothing to say, I even understand that we can compare it to a 57, so difference is huge!
2 years before I was like all the monde57
And one day, I recorded and listened!
3 of 5 people found this review helpful
Phil443's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Any robust evidence.
I have a pair since ... since?? I have natr with such a long history.
What I like most: Everything. What I like least: nothing.
From the moment we do not ask him to replace a large static recovery of voice in the studio or go pick a song of whales by 2000 meters below sea level in its scope, it is not micro- ckeller ... I put my 9 only because perfection is not of this world and that I would not be too swollen ankles ings / technicians in Beyer ...
Excellent qualitprix Whereas if you have the equivalent to nine, we must break the bank srieusement, while a remaining opportunities in TG 201 trs affordable. It's something that everyone should have, and if I had to do my purchase? I would take four, brand new ...
4 of 4 people found this review helpful
Léo 2003's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I use 2 for at least 5 years
The SM57 and better. The stamp is subjectively enjoyable, however close to the 57 which it gets its medium.
It cash although the pressures of a guitar amp as well as more than 57 prcis.
I use it for recording percussion, drums, guitar amp (sometimes even lower for the upper range of the bass) and scne for acoustic guitar provides the body o Dfine as more than 57.
Good quality price.
INTERESTED in the second hand market over a nine sm57 price for a superior quality.
Rcidive conclusive and exprience.
4 of 4 people found this review helpful