All user reviews for the The T.bone MB85 Beta

Micro song.

Presented as a clone of a great brand.

OVERALL OPINION

I have several references microphone singing.

I bought an AKG D660 because I had this on a wireless capsule and the sound is decent for the price, it was also around 40 €.

I have SM58 Shure Beta58.

The MB85 beta is presented as a clone of the Beta 58.

Indeed the transition from one to the other, we say wow this is really not bad. Yes the bass is not too far forward, the overall tone of voice is not bad, nice. It does not attack in the medium as an SM58 can do evil equalized.

Listening a bit more, everything is part of the acute spectrum is not true at all, and found very unpleasantly forward, but no finesse, like the voice scratching on vinyl, while a beta 58 is sweet and faithful throughout the spectrum.

You tell me I compare a microphone € 40 with a € 160 micro.

Comparison with Prodipe TT1 famous that I use on weddings. The prodipe has more attack, treble end is very nice. Nothing to see! I always say that prodipe sounds "fair" to put his voice to the animation before it is really micro top, thomann too no longer wanted to return to service for this purpose. First and last time for animation microphone.

It will stay in my spare suitcase.

I will continue with my TT1 for small benefits, and for shure scenes.

Manufacturing side, bought the bundle with the foot and cable, and one evening after some manipulations, I managed to already damaging the paint MB85 while TT1 touch plastic finish with aging very well after 2-3 seasons . The metal grid is not as robust as the Shure ...

I'm a little disappointed with this microphone, in short it was worth the money ...

Pattern: Supercardioid
Bandwidth: 50 to 16,000 Hz

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for almost 2 years. it is a micro super sturdy. you can clean the grille and windscreen which are removable. its level, nice attack, brightness and good reproduction of the stamp. I can not do without it-so much so that in concert, I needed to deal with traditional sm58 and I wonder if I do not prefer his "big" brother beta 58 (but this may be due to my habits).

value for money against its direct competitor "shure": 10 t-bones, a shure

I would do without hesitation that choice and elsewhere, as the opportunity arises, I rachèterais two or three ...

Cheap Chinese copy of a beta 58, good construction trs, trs solid.

OVERALL OPINION

I ordered from Thoto, because one of my Behringer XM8500 (yes!) Curtain fell.
I use it for RPET can prs four months.
Honntement in RPET I do not mean the diffrence with an SM58 (I have no BETA58!).
So for those who can not afford a Shure is in my opinion the best in micro This category, much better than the XM8500.
Obviously if you push the live test, means the diffrence, still must have a coronation ear ... and I would say 80% of the singers (and singing) trs EST widely exploitable .

Dynamic mic .. t say it all before
39 Thomann .. a tear of joy running down my cheek

OVERALL OPINION

I bought a few days ago the site of unpied with Thomann and a cable for 59 XLRXLR!.
I wanted to buy a lil song to accompany my micro guitar.j 'had to opt for an SM58 dpart then reading the reviews for this Tbone I was tempted ..
I still wonder .. o is a freelance microphone so good quality for 39. the top.
I plug my taka elecacoustik and Tbone on my marshall amp Acoustic AS50R ... and it's hot, it's beautiful ..
For all who seek a scratch ptits micro cheap to push the song go for it!
It's all good ... .. 39 3yr warranty + and it is beautiful ... thank you foo.

Dynamic microphone, Shure beta type 58
Bandwidth: 50Hz to 16kHz
Super cardioid
resistance to feedback a little worse than the SM58 ...

OVERALL OPINION

I've received the past, and it's a massacre!
He has more headroom than a SM58, it is clear, has a color and a very agréable.Il presence is not loaded in the lower midrange as the Shure, the T bone sounds less grainy, more neutral and friendly tone of voice.
It does not have this side of the deaf SM58 which frustrated me at times and made it difficult to mix as I worked with configs.
Because of its brightness and its open side, it is perfect for my tenor voice as a musician and will suit many other singers that I am and will have to take care as a technician.
The voice appears more naturally with this mic, so we understand better what is sung as outlined Martinc.

In short, for 39 EURO! You have a very high quality microphone, better than SM58 and not having to blush before a BETA 58, which will fill many artists and technicians live and can be of service, or troubleshoot a home-studio.
In any case, it is a great investment whether for a first purchase or a complete fleet of micros.Je remake that choice without hesitation, ordered from Thomann and received at Lille in just three days.
What is the bomb, not much to send and a lot of satisfaction in return.

See above

OVERALL OPINION

- I use it in rehearsal and configuration caf conc'pour our rock band (for over 1 year)

- I love the sound quality, clear treble and no draft in the grave: excellent! I also love the quality of the micro (very heavy!) And delivery in protective plastic box with handle, all well protected by the foam

- We also have a Shure SM58 and a Shure PG55: frankly, there's no picture on the value price => take the T Bone MB85! to the € 59 THE T. BONE MB 85 BETA SET knew Thommann (ie + micro + foot XLR cable), it is still cheaper than a PG55 alone, and rendering has nothing to do! Let go of you!

- Exceptional Value for money: in addition, the microphone is guaranteed for 3 years!

- I would do without hesitation that choice (even if my fellow Zique me initially just looked with big eyes, who saw them by SHURE). However, now we need for planting microphones and amplifiers ...... I can not wait to test the MB75 (copy SHURE SM57) to see if the price / quality ratio is maddening!

Micro Dynamic Thomann is simply a copy of Shure Beta 58 to Beta 85 MB when in reverse.
Bandwidth: 50Hz to 16kHz
Super cardioid
Do not feedback, very good technology and not swtich.
To live it very effectively.
8 / 10 because it is a copy, but almost as good as the real.

OVERALL OPINION

It's been on 3 lives they are used, coupled with a Yamaha DM2000 digital.
It is impressive to say that I also report sees no difference with an sm58. it is not as good as 58beta but titillates the 58 sm see above.
Connecting to the studio is doing is testing it as well as the SM58, but the BETA58 is still more acute in long.

What I like most is the price, AC resistance and quality. thomann purchased and delivered on time, I was happy to see such high quality microphone for only € 39
It's an unbeatable price totally unbeatable.
It literally smashes all Seinheisers E815 E825.
On a micro saw this goal is not worth either € 39 or shure makes a huge profit on these microphones.
at connections and internal weld is normal, c no super quality but it's good.

I try to open mics: both rotten, that huge, the newman through shure Behringers and other ... This micro-level ranks shure. for a copy is a copy outstanding.

Repeat this choice for a microphone song: I think there is no better for this price for the opportunity and again, we find the SM58 for € 50 and in terrible condition ...

I'll keep you in touch on the wear and the evolution of sound as on my other opinions.

Dynamic microphone, all there is more "classic".
systmatiquement do not quote in "copy" of an SM58, it's just a micro diffrent, although quite similar in use.
it has its advantages / inconvnients in different situations and tastes.

if the jet can be SM58 earth 10 times and continue to work, I'm not sr whether the case of t-bone ... but there are singers who do not need a

OVERALL OPINION

Reu 3 days ago:

- Trade-in guitar amp: taken together with the t-bone and SM58 (I would have put them online). The t-bone is much more open, less gnreux mdium down, makes her a drier, sharper, more aggressive may be, but excs. Conversely, the SM58 is deaf may sound warmer, but too loaded in the lower mdium to be placed easily in a mix.
Here, no real preferences, it's about got and use. (Little more for the t-bone that will be easier to mix and little more for shure that "seems" warmer). A mix of both would probably IDAL, and if he had I would keep a t-bone.

- Repeating the voice gain more lv than SM58, and we find the clear and open cot makes default in SM58. Got question again, but a voice that must pass over the instruments, the advantage is clearly in the t-bone. Submitted least mdium down here is a benefit to the balance gnral.
forcment, we will find it more prone to feedback is the best return for opening up the treble, but left to choose, I prfre t-bone again.

review: the price, do not deprive yourself and you have to arrter Whereas the SM58 as THE vocal mic of references, despite the benefits of a.

Tbone MB85 beta thomann, 39, does not feedback (compared to shure sm58's studio which did)

OVERALL OPINION

I beginners in singing (I sing since childhood but I just will integrate a rock band) and I was looking for a micro reasonably priced and effective. I just bought with the advice I've seen here, because I did not want to shure sm58's I test dj studio several times repeated (not that n'tait mine), we did not get along, I did not get along, I did not enjoy singing, and I could not even grate my song.
"Shure SM58, microphone of references in any case, pro or beginners," he DSOL me a lot because it's not what I thought. So I refused to buy the one n'tant not satisfied, particularly having to pay over 100 for beginners ...
I tested the beta Tbone MB85 yesterday at the studio, and the miracle, he not only works well trs, trs sound is clear, and hear me! Finally! (Srieusement comments because I question me about my abilities in song) and repeats it went off without any concern, everyone silent happy, especially me, and I finally took the fun singing, AISIN that more confidence in myself even ...
I would not say that "the Tbone is the best, forget the SM58" I just think that every vote is specially and need a microphone that suits him, the SM58 does not suit me, and as best seen the price ...
I think it's a good report quality price trs, and I recommend it to beginners do not ruin souaitant and be heard with a good tone.
And I would not say either that it is a copy of sm58, it is totally DIFFERENT, absolutely not comparable.
And in regard to the feedback, it does not at all, not even once unlike shure that often happened.
I can not even say anything about his strong I just buy it, but hey, 39 is no big deal.
NB: it is guaranteed for 3 years at Thomann.

The serious
The acute,
The medium
for micro singing are very well represented.
It captures well the present (the punk rock and sometimes it screams and it fills me completely)
Far better than the Shure SM 58, which is a copy /....

OVERALL OPINION

I had a microphone singing urgently.
I really was disappointed with the SM 58 (except a drum, but if necessary) and informing me, I saw that the shure beta 58 was far better than its predecessor. Now playing on hard it's great.
Unable to procure the famous corny instead of money, and watching a lot of opinions on the beta 85 mb t-good. I run.
I do not know the visual / sound of the shure beta 58 I would say that micro is the ultimate in micro chant (c clear to me and I've had two weeks). A little equalization on the table to swing and ...................
I use it in my group and I would use it again in the studio probably in fact I'll take two more ..........
At this price, I would choose this if I'd be rich.
I done an overall score of 9.8 / 10 because I can not put 10 but still .......[/ b]

Micro-edge dynamic copy of sm58.
Nothing new under the sun ...

OVERALL OPINION

Used in singing lessons, on a multiplicity of voices, a sound system plugged in and speakers yamaha emx continental.

The MB85 is happened in their boiboites 2 years ago, full of other models have gone through the same sound, sm58, Sennheiser etc ... etc. ....

And yes, it does, versatile, suitable for any voice, a potato, do not feedback at all is: it is the mielleur sennheiser E825, which costs yet more.

Versatile, a nice sound as clear as the sm58, potato, in short, it's all good.

For that price, I would say that it is frankly not very well-best of my knowledge.

Over time, we see that it is quite fragile, do not mess it is, does not like to stick an alim 'phantom: it is his weak point.

Otherwise, the micro to recommend, for anyone who starts, and for the price, it's nice to have one side.
He heels indeed very easy sm58.

Bravo T bone for once!

I regularly use a Shure SM57 for sound with a trumpet and a flugelhorn in orchestral and jazz variety, I forgot my microphone during a rehearsal and I used the T-Bone MB85 (WHICH it is not designed to cause ...) in troubleshooting;
I was amazed, rendering the high notes, no saturation, crisp, what about the sound, I can play at 50cm. the microphone with his capture as good (or from the time one stays in front), I devote myself more to the hearts and also singing (baritone voice), the same conclusion, has to ask what justifies the difference price with a SM58 or SM57 (certainly the brand), other Shure enthusiasts can "demolish" material, in my case, I adopt it and I recommend it, remains to be seen what will overlook duration, but given the price ask for more ...

OVERALL OPINION

Value for money, nothing to envy to the Shure SM 57 or 58, I would even say that, considering the price, go for this material, you'll get your money. Given the material he looks suspiciously like the SM58, almost identical weight and the solid feel. I have used only three times, but I passed, considering the quality of bass and treble, which are sharp compared with a shure SM57, which is more muffled, I'm not a big technician, but (without boasting) I have a good ear for music and any musician that respect, will soon realize what I mean. Much more than the good stuff for troubleshooting ...

Cardioid dynamic microphone. Copy t-bone of the series shure 58. Listening to it is really very close BETA58A, then set off on this comparison ...

OVERALL OPINION

From the outset we note that the difference is incredibly minimal compared to the original. Only the gain of the microphone is a little bit down compared to the original, but there is talk of only 1 or 2 dBs barely noticeable then. I have found by analyzing the curves of a test on the two pickups in parallel, since I also have a BETA58A 2005. A choice, I would only T-bone, however I took two and I'll recommend two more next month for the resumption of my group of different musicians on stage (with an apparent SCT200 excellent micro as well). The strength we'll see in time, but hey at 40 €, we must break out of 4 anyway to compensate for the price of a single 58a, I have a doubt that it is not profitable in the long term and we do not tend to throw our stuff against the wall, suddenly I do not have too much to worry about.