kaiser2333
Note : 10 sur 10
Published on 09/14/05 at 10:27
See other opinions
UTILIZATION
Manuel a little big, simple and clear operation of the tool. Good set not always easy to obtain.
SOUND QUALITY
The distortion is certainly a little below the rest but équalisée and subtly associated with the compression, it may give surprising results of heat.
For the rest, I never found a better classical effects (delay, chorus beautiful, filter, phaser, ..)
Pitch shifter a bit messy
OVERALL OPINION
I use the GP16 for 6 years and have never found a multiple effect of such a quality (reverbs, delays, equalo, chorus, phaser, comp, filter, ..). In + is hyper-resistant (more than 50 concerts, 6 years in wet, poor transport in a box with cables and not a fart through ..).
Recently tried it on a voice, he also made all its worth.
Settings are easy to understand but there are many subtleties to understand by changing the order of effects.
Basically, maybe a little out of his very personalized for (metal), but very versatile and excellent for the rest.
UTILIZATION
Manuel a little big, simple and clear operation of the tool. Good set not always easy to obtain.
SOUND QUALITY
The distortion is certainly a little below the rest but équalisée and subtly associated with the compression, it may give surprising results of heat.
For the rest, I never found a better classical effects (delay, chorus beautiful, filter, phaser, ..)
Pitch shifter a bit messy
OVERALL OPINION
I use the GP16 for 6 years and have never found a multiple effect of such a quality (reverbs, delays, equalo, chorus, phaser, comp, filter, ..). In + is hyper-resistant (more than 50 concerts, 6 years in wet, poor transport in a box with cables and not a fart through ..).
Recently tried it on a voice, he also made all its worth.
Settings are easy to understand but there are many subtleties to understand by changing the order of effects.
Basically, maybe a little out of his very personalized for (metal), but very versatile and excellent for the rest.