All user reviews for the Image Line Fruity Loops 3

Installation without problem.
gnral the config is easy, the software is very simple handle.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

My config is the era of fruity: 733 p3, 256 ram, DD 5400 rev / min

this config c'tait trs if I used the modules fruity loops, for resources against the evil trs trs g for VST instrument and effect and DX which consumes more than bcp resources if they are open ds cubase for example.

black spot: the stability (this is gonna qd is core modules .. but it is not stable at all with VSTI DXI or.)

OVERALL OPINION

I used one year.

I loved the simplicity of handling, and report quality price seems good since the update is free for life.

by against the grain noise is dplorable ds that mix multiple tracks, and programming is far from being at the top.

With the exprience I would not choose to re .. Reason for beginners I find better or on cubase SL but it is probably more healer, though I pass trs good momment with fruity loops and it is a soft smelling the Ides penss well!

Trouble-free installation, no problems of incompatibility either.
The app is easy to use, the primary functions are intuitive, and go into more detail, the manual is well screwed, even if we would like to have more tips (fortunately There's sites like Audiofanzine!). Compared to its competitors, is suffering from a virtual studio interface quite "heavy", and finally it is a matter of taste.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Before renewing my PC config, I had a PII/400MHz/128Mo RAM / Old Aureal sound card
and I must say that with Win98, FL doing well (of course, with "too many" effects and tracks, it's loose).

OVERALL OPINION

I use this app and I have not let go.

+: Can be quickly programmed drum loops, melodic lines (mostly oriented Electro), assign FX and get a good result (in the ear for quality, there's rumors)
-: The Pianoroll is impractical when we need to go into a high resolution (8th of black ... it is then necessary to set the note)
-: The sequencer can just put layer patterns, resulting in automated systems that quickly become galley (I advise Floops + A sequencer door (cubase SX and Acid for example)).

Price / quality ratio, we can not complain.
I probably do it again the choice, but if I had known, I would have waited FL Studio, instead of getting ripped off with "updates gratos"

Installation is by itself: only snag I've never paramtr squence for MIDI hardware and I'd like to learn more.
I think it is compatible with all VST plug-in then has the choice.
As I am the soft rest is accessible trs. (The first PC and it was my first software)
The manual I did not need.
I put my nine non-knowledge of hard. I will say more but ending for the latest version.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

A laptop desktop Packard Bell AMD Athlon 550MHz 188mo of RAM and a small hard drive 6.6 GB (when the speed faura same as I learn ... well it works so good).
It is true that saturates the processor a little, but only on certain dmo (songs) and really load effects plugin.
The config is pretty good but is stable even when not forget to save once in a while the songs: in fact it happens that a plant ... after 3 / 4 hours of use. I emphasize that the sound card is original is so good even when not asking too much.

OVERALL OPINION

It's 3 / 4 that I use (version 2.0 or antrieure THE FIRST with the TS404). Since I bought a machine so it is ct lack of proper interface. What I like most is the fast edition of sounds and sound lines, the step and the number of squence insrable effects per track (in addition there are not so bad a)
I tried Arturia (or Storm) and some Reason. APRS and I had Soudforge Acid (or anything but hey).
I think it is a good software for beginners (easy to CSTA) or more.
I will soon invest ds version 5.0 which I have heard here for the next exit or the management of the afternoon with my machine and if it works I think I would not even look elsewhere.

Yes, no problem install xp sp2 with the same.

gnrale configuration? yes as you do not touch too much hardware via MIDI.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Asus A7N8X, 512 RAM, Athlon XP2600 +, the major weakness ... soundblaster live audigy light version I know which model y'en too creative in ...
the software runs well based, but the use of plug like absynth and destroy series of fx in really spit / crash the map

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for over 5 years and have really seen the soft evolve to some nearly complete, but plutt to live I think.
I really want to try it with a card worthy of the name since I absynth transplant, and some other plug.
yes, no doubt (no need to call Julien Courbet), I do it again this choice. Considering the price it is always good to have in its config. easily accessible and allows you to create interesting rhythms very quickly.

Fruity Loops 3 was extremely easy to use and the step sequencer is so easy its just point and click and you have a drum and or percussion pattern laid down and ready to go. You can also edit midi notes really easy. If you don’t have a midi keyboard you can use your computer keyboard as a mide keyboard. I didn’t enjoy that too much because it was difficult to tell which note you are actually playing but if that’s what you had to do you could make it work and get pretty good at it. Or you could just use the mouse and draw in the notes yourself and never have to play them out. A lot of musicians have said that they hate programs like these, meaning the ones that you can just draw notes in. They hate it because it allows us to create progressions that are pretty much impossible to play on a real keyboard and just draw them in and make them sound great.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Image Lines Fruity Loops 3 started to change the digital workstation computer software as we know it. Right around the time that Fruity Loops 3 came out is when everyone started creating vst’s to purchase and download so the internet was flooded with vst’s and all types of plug ins. Some good and some bad be none the less they where available for Fruity Loops 3 and it made it that much better.

OVERALL OPINION

Fruity Loops 3 was a powerful program that you can upgrade whenever you are ready, FL studio is up to version 10 right now and not too much has changed, just a few minor things in the playlist. But besides that you can hope right onto Fruity Loops 10 and feel right at home like you have used it before and you will have no issues.

Quick and easy

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Fruity Loops sequencer is the most powerful and cheaper.

It works on just about all the Bécanne, with a lot of ram or not bcp, powerful processor or not ...

patterns are up to 64 pads. after you have to make songs (elektron = 32 sps ... not!)

Stable software.

The only BMOL is to synchronize with other machines, or PC: it's the mouse! it also saw the capacity incomprhensible it!

OVERALL OPINION

I have version 3 for 6 years !!!!!

+ what I love: the simplicity of the samples and synth drums.

what I like - This is the basic sequencer! shame we can not do laps on a track differentss same pattern (see rm1x)!!

report qualitprix = good!