Fruity Loops 3 classified ad
Alerte nouvelle annonceReviews
4.4/5(8 reviews)
50 %
38 %
13 %
Write a user review
yoTrakkzPublished on 09/05/11 at 21:06
Fruity Loops 3 was extremely easy to use and the step sequencer is so easy its just point and click and you have a drum and or percussion pattern laid down and ready to go. You can also edit midi notes really easy. If you don’t have a midi keyboard you can use your computer keyboard as a mide keyboard. I didn’t enjoy that too much because it was difficult to tell which note you are actually playing but if that’s what you had to do you could make it work and get pretty good at it. Or you could just use the mouse and draw in the notes yourself and never have to play them out. A lot of musicians have said that they hate programs like these, meaning the ones that you can just draw notes in....…
Read more
Fruity Loops 3 was extremely easy to use and the step sequencer is so easy its just point and click and you have a drum and or percussion pattern laid down and ready to go. You can also edit midi notes really easy. If you don’t have a midi keyboard you can use your computer keyboard as a mide keyboard. I didn’t enjoy that too much because it was difficult to tell which note you are actually playing but if that’s what you had to do you could make it work and get pretty good at it. Or you could just use the mouse and draw in the notes yourself and never have to play them out. A lot of musicians have said that they hate programs like these, meaning the ones that you can just draw notes in. They hate it because it allows us to create progressions that are pretty much impossible to play on a real keyboard and just draw them in and make them sound great.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Image Lines Fruity Loops 3 started to change the digital workstation computer software as we know it. Right around the time that Fruity Loops 3 came out is when everyone started creating vst’s to purchase and download so the internet was flooded with vst’s and all types of plug ins. Some good and some bad be none the less they where available for Fruity Loops 3 and it made it that much better.
OVERALL OPINION
Fruity Loops 3 was a powerful program that you can upgrade whenever you are ready, FL studio is up to version 10 right now and not too much has changed, just a few minor things in the playlist. But besides that you can hope right onto Fruity Loops 10 and feel right at home like you have used it before and you will have no issues.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Image Lines Fruity Loops 3 started to change the digital workstation computer software as we know it. Right around the time that Fruity Loops 3 came out is when everyone started creating vst’s to purchase and download so the internet was flooded with vst’s and all types of plug ins. Some good and some bad be none the less they where available for Fruity Loops 3 and it made it that much better.
OVERALL OPINION
Fruity Loops 3 was a powerful program that you can upgrade whenever you are ready, FL studio is up to version 10 right now and not too much has changed, just a few minor things in the playlist. But besides that you can hope right onto Fruity Loops 10 and feel right at home like you have used it before and you will have no issues.
See less
00
»
N-tekPublished on 01/06/03 at 18:03 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
FACILITIES-trs simple.
Non-
Yes
Yes
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
MSI KT4 Ultra-SR / AMD XP 2400 + / 512 DDR PC2700 / Maxtor 120GB HDD / Intgr sound card.
Yes
-
Yes
OVERALL OPINION
-2 Years
-Effects / Always the same
Non-
-Excellent
Yes for beginners.
Non-
Yes
Yes
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
MSI KT4 Ultra-SR / AMD XP 2400 + / 512 DDR PC2700 / Maxtor 120GB HDD / Intgr sound card.
Yes
-
Yes
OVERALL OPINION
-2 Years
-Effects / Always the same
Non-
-Excellent
Yes for beginners.
10
»
Dr DrillerPublished on 03/04/03 at 07:45 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Installation without problem.
gnral the config is easy, the software is very simple handle.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
My config is the era of fruity: 733 p3, 256 ram, DD 5400 rev / min
this config c'tait trs if I used the modules fruity loops, for resources against the evil trs trs g for VST instrument and effect and DX which consumes more than bcp resources if they are open ds cubase for example.
black spot: the stability (this is gonna qd is core modules .. but it is not stable at all with VSTI DXI or.)
OVERALL OPINION
I used one year.
I loved the simplicity of handling, and report quality price seems good since the update is free for life.
by against the grain...…
gnral the config is easy, the software is very simple handle.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
My config is the era of fruity: 733 p3, 256 ram, DD 5400 rev / min
this config c'tait trs if I used the modules fruity loops, for resources against the evil trs trs g for VST instrument and effect and DX which consumes more than bcp resources if they are open ds cubase for example.
black spot: the stability (this is gonna qd is core modules .. but it is not stable at all with VSTI DXI or.)
OVERALL OPINION
I used one year.
I loved the simplicity of handling, and report quality price seems good since the update is free for life.
by against the grain...…
Read more
Installation without problem.
gnral the config is easy, the software is very simple handle.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
My config is the era of fruity: 733 p3, 256 ram, DD 5400 rev / min
this config c'tait trs if I used the modules fruity loops, for resources against the evil trs trs g for VST instrument and effect and DX which consumes more than bcp resources if they are open ds cubase for example.
black spot: the stability (this is gonna qd is core modules .. but it is not stable at all with VSTI DXI or.)
OVERALL OPINION
I used one year.
I loved the simplicity of handling, and report quality price seems good since the update is free for life.
by against the grain noise is dplorable ds that mix multiple tracks, and programming is far from being at the top.
With the exprience I would not choose to re .. Reason for beginners I find better or on cubase SL but it is probably more healer, though I pass trs good momment with fruity loops and it is a soft smelling the Ides penss well!
gnral the config is easy, the software is very simple handle.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
My config is the era of fruity: 733 p3, 256 ram, DD 5400 rev / min
this config c'tait trs if I used the modules fruity loops, for resources against the evil trs trs g for VST instrument and effect and DX which consumes more than bcp resources if they are open ds cubase for example.
black spot: the stability (this is gonna qd is core modules .. but it is not stable at all with VSTI DXI or.)
OVERALL OPINION
I used one year.
I loved the simplicity of handling, and report quality price seems good since the update is free for life.
by against the grain noise is dplorable ds that mix multiple tracks, and programming is far from being at the top.
With the exprience I would not choose to re .. Reason for beginners I find better or on cubase SL but it is probably more healer, though I pass trs good momment with fruity loops and it is a soft smelling the Ides penss well!
See less
11
»
Busy ChildPublished on 02/29/04 at 03:11 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Trouble-free installation, no problems of incompatibility either.
The app is easy to use, the primary functions are intuitive, and go into more detail, the manual is well screwed, even if we would like to have more tips (fortunately There's sites like Audiofanzine!). Compared to its competitors, is suffering from a virtual studio interface quite "heavy", and finally it is a matter of taste.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Before renewing my PC config, I had a PII/400MHz/128Mo RAM / Old Aureal sound card
and I must say that with Win98, FL doing well (of course, with "too many" effects and tracks, it's loose).
OVERALL OPINION
I use this app and I have not let go.
+: Can be quickly...…
The app is easy to use, the primary functions are intuitive, and go into more detail, the manual is well screwed, even if we would like to have more tips (fortunately There's sites like Audiofanzine!). Compared to its competitors, is suffering from a virtual studio interface quite "heavy", and finally it is a matter of taste.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Before renewing my PC config, I had a PII/400MHz/128Mo RAM / Old Aureal sound card
and I must say that with Win98, FL doing well (of course, with "too many" effects and tracks, it's loose).
OVERALL OPINION
I use this app and I have not let go.
+: Can be quickly...…
Read more
Trouble-free installation, no problems of incompatibility either.
The app is easy to use, the primary functions are intuitive, and go into more detail, the manual is well screwed, even if we would like to have more tips (fortunately There's sites like Audiofanzine!). Compared to its competitors, is suffering from a virtual studio interface quite "heavy", and finally it is a matter of taste.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Before renewing my PC config, I had a PII/400MHz/128Mo RAM / Old Aureal sound card
and I must say that with Win98, FL doing well (of course, with "too many" effects and tracks, it's loose).
OVERALL OPINION
I use this app and I have not let go.
+: Can be quickly programmed drum loops, melodic lines (mostly oriented Electro), assign FX and get a good result (in the ear for quality, there's rumors)
-: The Pianoroll is impractical when we need to go into a high resolution (8th of black ... it is then necessary to set the note)
-: The sequencer can just put layer patterns, resulting in automated systems that quickly become galley (I advise Floops + A sequencer door (cubase SX and Acid for example)).
Price / quality ratio, we can not complain.
I probably do it again the choice, but if I had known, I would have waited FL Studio, instead of getting ripped off with "updates gratos"
The app is easy to use, the primary functions are intuitive, and go into more detail, the manual is well screwed, even if we would like to have more tips (fortunately There's sites like Audiofanzine!). Compared to its competitors, is suffering from a virtual studio interface quite "heavy", and finally it is a matter of taste.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Before renewing my PC config, I had a PII/400MHz/128Mo RAM / Old Aureal sound card
and I must say that with Win98, FL doing well (of course, with "too many" effects and tracks, it's loose).
OVERALL OPINION
I use this app and I have not let go.
+: Can be quickly programmed drum loops, melodic lines (mostly oriented Electro), assign FX and get a good result (in the ear for quality, there's rumors)
-: The Pianoroll is impractical when we need to go into a high resolution (8th of black ... it is then necessary to set the note)
-: The sequencer can just put layer patterns, resulting in automated systems that quickly become galley (I advise Floops + A sequencer door (cubase SX and Acid for example)).
Price / quality ratio, we can not complain.
I probably do it again the choice, but if I had known, I would have waited FL Studio, instead of getting ripped off with "updates gratos"
See less
10
»
Audio excerpts
-
00:0003:39
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Image Line
- Model: Fruity Loops 3
- Series: Fruity Loops
- Category: Electronic Music Sequencers
- Added in our database on: 11/18/2003
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other categories in Software Sequencers
Other names: fruity loops 3, fruityloops3, fruityloops 3, fruity loops3