Published on 05/19/01 at 15:07
See General Appreciation
UTILIZATION
See General Appreciation
SOUND QUALITY
See General Appreciation
OVERALL OPINION
The behringer feedback destroyer is not developed, and Beware of automatic filters. The principle seems to be by phase inversion, out for a Q high (type 1 / 3 octave) phase reversal restores you sound awful. The scanning is slow and cons of inefficase larsens fast. On many applications the filter attenuates not know why the entire frequency range. Leaving you a muffled sound. On the front you remember, but on a return circuit ...,....,....!!!!! This unit is incomparable with Sabin. If you do not want to put too much rather use the method 'classic' with an equalizer 1 / 3 octave. The rejector of feedback should be used only as a spare wheel and after a good sound system including wedged in the choice of matéreils I could use the behringer feedback, I find this unit bad.
UTILIZATION
See General Appreciation
SOUND QUALITY
See General Appreciation
OVERALL OPINION
The behringer feedback destroyer is not developed, and Beware of automatic filters. The principle seems to be by phase inversion, out for a Q high (type 1 / 3 octave) phase reversal restores you sound awful. The scanning is slow and cons of inefficase larsens fast. On many applications the filter attenuates not know why the entire frequency range. Leaving you a muffled sound. On the front you remember, but on a return circuit ...,....,....!!!!! This unit is incomparable with Sabin. If you do not want to put too much rather use the method 'classic' with an equalizer 1 / 3 octave. The rejector of feedback should be used only as a spare wheel and after a good sound system including wedged in the choice of matéreils I could use the behringer feedback, I find this unit bad.