berry036
Note : 10 sur 10
Published on 11/14/04 at 14:54
Best value:
Excellent
The silent installation extremely simple: a floppy disk in the Atari 1040 ste, and shoo!
The configuration presented no problem.
The manual trsdtaill silent. I even learned programming sysex.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Beginners in the 1990s, when I used this software, I:
A ste-1040 (then an Mga st4);
A Roland-S50;
Roland R8-a
One-D110;
A 128-Digitech + (multi-purpose noon);
There was no problem of latency. The only problem came from the synths (polyphony enough!)
I added in 1997, a CS1x: I m'quiper of a merger to run all the equipment.
The software silent hyper-stable: no bug in eight years!
About performance, the more powerful Cubase silent most squenceurs hardware. Just remember the pro studios, which often quips taient an Atari and Cubase.
OVERALL OPINION
Quality-price ratio: excellent. A great tool for anyone who wanted to engage in the computer music, but taient broke.
I do not regret having made that choice, I Whereas the squenceur as having rvolutionn computer music.
The configuration presented no problem.
The manual trsdtaill silent. I even learned programming sysex.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Beginners in the 1990s, when I used this software, I:
A ste-1040 (then an Mga st4);
A Roland-S50;
Roland R8-a
One-D110;
A 128-Digitech + (multi-purpose noon);
There was no problem of latency. The only problem came from the synths (polyphony enough!)
I added in 1997, a CS1x: I m'quiper of a merger to run all the equipment.
The software silent hyper-stable: no bug in eight years!
About performance, the more powerful Cubase silent most squenceurs hardware. Just remember the pro studios, which often quips taient an Atari and Cubase.
OVERALL OPINION
Quality-price ratio: excellent. A great tool for anyone who wanted to engage in the computer music, but taient broke.
I do not regret having made that choice, I Whereas the squenceur as having rvolutionn computer music.