Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Steinberg Cubase SX 2 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Steinberg Cubase SX 2
Images
1/138
Steinberg Cubase SX 2
utopik utopik
Published on 12/08/03 at 05:15
Installation made in 5 minutes dbalage understood without problem.
Configuration very simple.
No software compatibility problems and rewire UA1000 immediately recognized.
Manual handling is in French. Trs is clear and easy for beginners to accsmme. He explains through examples the main features. The manual is supplied in PDF Retailer in English, but it's not complicated to understand.
I put 10 because it's really simple to implement ...

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

My PC is low on an ASUS A7N8X motherboard, Athlon 2.5 barton, 2x256 Corsair XMS400 RAM, graphics card GForce 4 Ti 4200 64MB Leadtek, and 80 GB Maxtor drive 8 MB cache, 7200 Tr / m ...
No incompatibility reports.
I have not Russi Exceeds 25% CPU load with Absynth, Kontakt, plugs of 8 different audio tracks Stro 48KHz + 5 MIDI tracks with Reason 2.5 in rewire ...
I have an Edirol UA1000 in sound card, and runs perfectly.

OVERALL OPINION

I have Cubase SX 2 for 1 week, and I do m'arrte more to play with. I do not Russi after planting, even trying ;-)
I like it because it's beautiful and enjoyable to use, but also because I always used Cubase since version 3 and XT and VST32 and R5, and SX, etc ...
I agree that the versions antrieures n'taient not conceived for the height of which goes to the audio processing. But now with this new version, bad language have that much to stand, because it's really the height of the top of the market Dtd. I compare Digital Performer, Logic or samplitude no problem. The new audio engine is REALLY suprieur concurence. The limitless possibilities of routing places the height of the best. The possibilities are always twelve o'clock t is strength, and VSTi or Rewire intgration is Steinberg who invented ... For 700 euros available software really gnial with a report qualitprix gal without exception may be the ct Sonar 3 producer who provided more than extensions of apps, but not at Cubase SX2. Sonar may be more suited for someone looking for a product a while with all the effects, synths and virtual sampler Intgr. But necessarily, this is not the height of a Cubase SX2 + Kontakt + Access Virus C. .. They do not apply to same customers I think.
In conclusion, I would do the same choices Obviously, since I am satisfied ...