Log in
Log in

or

Thread Cakewalk vs. Cubase

  • 1 comment
  • 2 participants
  • 420 views
  • 0 follower
gseront2

gseront2

2 posts
New AFfiliate
First post
1 Posted on 01/25/2005 at 00:32:19
Hello,

I am looking for a good software to set-up a virtual studio.
The typical use would be guitar+voice recording with synthetic drum and synthe (I have a midi keyboard).

I was decided to buy Cakewalk Sonar, but when I went to the shop, the guy told me: "Don't do that! Go for Cubase instead."

The reasons he gave were:

1) Cubase is a de-facto standard
2) You can find a lot of virtual instrument for free on the net in VST format (Steinberg format?), while you can't for Sonar.

Is that true?
What are the pro and con of each solution?

thanks in advance for your replies,

Gregg
manowar

manowar

161 posts
AFfinity Poster
2 Posted on 01/25/2005 at 08:07:35
You can use almost all vst plugins in sonar or cubase. I'm using cubase but I try sonar too and I think there is no big difference. You must just used to one of them. They both support rewire for rewire with other programs(like reason).
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages and show you personalised ads (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Google Analytics
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Google Analytics

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.