prodilion
Note : 6 sur 10
Published on 02/24/04 at 08:47
View PDF on the site with photos of the legends pedals mules.
On paper it's euphoria!
UTILIZATION
After 10 years of practice, we must be able to rprer without the doc.
SOUND QUALITY
The +: large sound.
the -: not playable trs and cold.
OVERALL OPINION
I tried the FM4 store and I t's. While extraordinary sounds from outer space but carrment unusable. The rglages trs are sensitive, and the buttons have diffrent meanings depending on context so it's anything but intuitive.
In addition, it not sound hot trs I find when I'm not at all what criticizes the POD (the same manufacturer). For cons, I fell for the Bass Micro Synthesizer Electro-Harmonix (see opinion). You have a low and you would like a moog on scne? Ben sailing.
The FM4 is probably in the studio, the o was time to take the head.
It pedals so mule filter that I think it does not have much competition today, unless we limit an effect based filtering (eg Electro-harmonix).
Although 'this time, would see the multi-effect perhaps?
On paper it's euphoria!
UTILIZATION
After 10 years of practice, we must be able to rprer without the doc.
SOUND QUALITY
The +: large sound.
the -: not playable trs and cold.
OVERALL OPINION
I tried the FM4 store and I t's. While extraordinary sounds from outer space but carrment unusable. The rglages trs are sensitive, and the buttons have diffrent meanings depending on context so it's anything but intuitive.
In addition, it not sound hot trs I find when I'm not at all what criticizes the POD (the same manufacturer). For cons, I fell for the Bass Micro Synthesizer Electro-Harmonix (see opinion). You have a low and you would like a moog on scne? Ben sailing.
The FM4 is probably in the studio, the o was time to take the head.
It pedals so mule filter that I think it does not have much competition today, unless we limit an effect based filtering (eg Electro-harmonix).
Although 'this time, would see the multi-effect perhaps?