3020i classified ad
New ad alertImages
Reviews
5.0/5(1 reviews)
Write a user review
22hh22corrective
Published on 11/09/14 at 07:45 (This content has been automatically translated from French)This is an addition ("decree") my first reviews of the NAD C326BEE.
After reading several forums on various devices, I noticed a note that often comes up jumpers that connect the preamp output to the input amplifier "degrade the sound," and many commentators recommend to replace the cables.
This caught my attention, so I tried it on my C326BEE.
Well, I'm not income.
I can say that I did not hear the real sound of the NAD as there was the original riders.
The criticisms I sent him (especially serious back and the medium rather gaunt) have immediately disappeared. And of course, we get different results depending on the cable (for my part, I got the best sound with Mogami, during...…
After reading several forums on various devices, I noticed a note that often comes up jumpers that connect the preamp output to the input amplifier "degrade the sound," and many commentators recommend to replace the cables.
This caught my attention, so I tried it on my C326BEE.
Well, I'm not income.
I can say that I did not hear the real sound of the NAD as there was the original riders.
The criticisms I sent him (especially serious back and the medium rather gaunt) have immediately disappeared. And of course, we get different results depending on the cable (for my part, I got the best sound with Mogami, during...…
Read more
This is an addition ("decree") my first reviews of the NAD C326BEE.
After reading several forums on various devices, I noticed a note that often comes up jumpers that connect the preamp output to the input amplifier "degrade the sound," and many commentators recommend to replace the cables.
This caught my attention, so I tried it on my C326BEE.
Well, I'm not income.
I can say that I did not hear the real sound of the NAD as there was the original riders.
The criticisms I sent him (especially serious back and the medium rather gaunt) have immediately disappeared. And of course, we get different results depending on the cable (for my part, I got the best sound with Mogami, during my tests); but, whatever the cable, the improvement is obvious - and ultimately, in the sense that we can not go back and go back to listening to the riders. This is not really surprising when one examines these jumpers: the metal part that goes into the RCA jack seems a common metal that evokes a nail ... - issue costs, of course.
In my opinion, do not blame the manufacturer, considering the price of the amp, but just be aware of this problem and replace the jumpers with real cable.
After reading several forums on various devices, I noticed a note that often comes up jumpers that connect the preamp output to the input amplifier "degrade the sound," and many commentators recommend to replace the cables.
This caught my attention, so I tried it on my C326BEE.
Well, I'm not income.
I can say that I did not hear the real sound of the NAD as there was the original riders.
The criticisms I sent him (especially serious back and the medium rather gaunt) have immediately disappeared. And of course, we get different results depending on the cable (for my part, I got the best sound with Mogami, during my tests); but, whatever the cable, the improvement is obvious - and ultimately, in the sense that we can not go back and go back to listening to the riders. This is not really surprising when one examines these jumpers: the metal part that goes into the RCA jack seems a common metal that evokes a nail ... - issue costs, of course.
In my opinion, do not blame the manufacturer, considering the price of the amp, but just be aware of this problem and replace the jumpers with real cable.
See less
43
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Nad
- Model: 3020i
- Category: Hi-Fi Amplifiers
- Added in our database on: 09/09/2009
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other categories in Hi-Fi
Other names: 3020 i, 30 20i, 30 20 i