WTTS about 100 rms
The tweeter produces detailed highs and not too prescriptive
the medium provides a more heavily on voice, strings and really clarifies the sound message.
medium and tweeter can be adjusted on the front.
the bass is correct with a good 25cm woofer.
Great speakers such as are longer these days, at least in many brands like jbl who turn to ranges of picturesque small columns and frustrating with a high-end is still interesting but unaffordable.
The motor winding from the top 25cm woofer.
I use these speakers with an amp household Marantz 1122DC
over the front grille protects the transducers without much real filter
because the sound behind the fabric there is a layer of metal protection
great when you have small children or a cat that likes to do his claws.
On the frequency curve adjustment of tweeter and midrange is provided on the front
the stereo is very good
sound perfectly clear and precise for a perfect listening classical to jazz
through the rock or pop as low at high SPL.
the performance of these speakers is 88dB at 1 meter for 1watt away what is correct
I use these speakers since 1978 and can not change
JBL sound really reflects what we hear in concert is great
After testing many other brands under the same conditions I opted
L 50 for a micro test alone (my voice) with the last conccurents Cabasse Sampan 310 heavy.
the price / quality ratio is outstanding against everything I've tested
Today I would do the same choice.
One small downside, the boomers remembranage too expensive because
one workshop in France I suppose, where no conccurents = 400 euros suspension.voilà how good things go away ..... JBL but I give 10/10
Despite this handicap rather sad.
The appearance of these speakers feel the quality.
Domestic and stro cinma home.
SCOTT 420A Stereo Amp and Yamaha RX v340RDS.
All more than satisfactory clarity exelente woofers that rpondent trs well and especially well think that a box absobe all vibrations.
L50 changed the woofers are alinico 125A with a magnet instead of those of ferrite.
I use them for 1 year.
A bass response and a high-end clarity with the HP medium and treble of good bills.
I have already tried the Acoustic researh 93 "AR93" Bass in opposition but it is quite hollow and lacking in clarity from the L50.
Rappport quality price "opportunity" widely seen as attractive to an equivalence of the new home market should invest at least 500euros.
Buy 50 euros in a neighborhood with Broque suspat dchires Repair Tool and 200 euros in the house of HP in exchange standart with the same team of Hp engine alnico.
djdef's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I use JBL M-50 L ds is the sound recording studio.
pk? pregnant because it is a clarity of sound and power that is looking in the studio. c yes true, you'll tell me that we use studio monitors normally I Fully agree and I try more than just imagine it with prices just as the same, but my choice c cover I L-50 by pure chance.
I first had them as young buy for him (+ / - 25 years), and a few years ago, he asked me to replace the membrane over time (given their age) n'taient cooler . and after sending JBL in California I have tested and does thunder sound. I have therefore wins in my studio and my choice was quickly made t.
It provides very good power at the woofer has the body fat that does not move to 10 th of a mm (I have control with a comparator of the 100me mm, and the medium and 2 hp Acute (j'insite well on the hp and not a factory as we twiter mnt)
C true that I use them in the studio and I go through a whole bunch of filters and amplifiers before my prossesseur, but even without her it is a curve that frquense more enjoyable and makes us a clear and PRCI (of HIAL was 2 rglage filter me I have a rgl Moitiers of cardran)
Now this was almost 3 years that I used and I will not want me in. dbarasser and my clients either.
pourtemps I tried MODELS but my choice will always return it.
value for money, I will not say anything because I'm not the invistisement but mnt I know the price, YES