How long have you use it? I use this mic in the bridge position on an Ibanez pf200 of 1978 for 6 months. I kept the original neck pickup (Ibanez 70), because it rings of hell, vintage trs. By dint of costs on record and in concert on super micro 70 in the bridge position seemed a bit rough and aggressive <img class="smiley" src="https://fr.audiofanzine.com/images/audiofanzine/interface/smileys/icon_wink.gif" alt="wink" /> I was looking for a micro prcis and vintage. This is done with the Mule. It brings together the two qualities I was looking for, namely precision and beautiful sound. A small but because the shuffled BMOL super 70/Mule say is .. special!
What is the particular feature you like best and least? So I rarely use the position intermdiaire my pickup selector to take advantage of the best of each microphone. Indeed the extreme precision of the micro and natural compression that caractrise is a plus for the musician mticuleux. But because there is a but for me I find this mic a little "cold", much less warm than the super 70. Then distortion is that of happiness but for his velvety I turn to its Japanese ancestor <img class="smiley" src="https://fr.audiofanzine.com/images/audiofanzine/interface/smileys/icon_biggrin.gif" alt="biggrin" />
Have you tried many other models before acqurir? The test I know the kind REFERENCE DiMarzio, Fender, Gibson, EMG, Seymour Duncan. There are good mics for trs in all these brands but I was looking for a sound "original". Mission accomplished!
How do you report qualitprix? The report quality price seems justified because it is an almost artisanal production and srieuse. The quality has a price!
Exprience with, you will do again this choice? ... I think so. It fulfills its purpose with flying colors.