All user reviews of 4/5 for the Yamaha Tyros 2

So for the sounds of the tyros 2: NOTHING TO SAY vrritablement, really sounds good and everything AND sonnorits characteristics of Gnrale fawn is frankly the GOOD.
malgrs the fact that it is composed of 61 keys that I put 10/10 without hsiter.

USE

For parcontre use the ...
Facing a ROLAND G-70 tyros dutout does not hold water in terms of ergonomics.
I find the best arranger Introduced on roland well as on the tyros, the possibilities are much more gandes.
My BIGGEST regret is the abscence of "smart" mode, a function of the arranger for me is serious practice.
When the manual, drop ... I have a G-70 at home for 2 years and I have opened his textbook few times.
However, it can aprcier other things like singing, composing (pristine audio recording is very correct), carry it without much problem it is fragile (it was always the fear of scratching or break the screen ...), we can register our name and given name and to be displayed ds turning on the camera lol!
We have fun all the same well with tyros.

NOTICE GLOBAL

To conclude I would say I do not regret my choice, but between tyros and G-70, it would really weigh the pros and cons for the roland is a very very good machine, shame we do can regain the sounds of tyros above sniff !!!

All this to say that I am because I combl 2 watching me home h h

So for the sounds of the tyros 2: NOTHING TO SAY vrritablement, really sounds good and everything AND sonnorits characteristics of Gnrale fawn is frankly the GOOD.
malgrs the fact that it is composed of 61 keys that I put 10/10 without hsiter.

USE

For parcontre use the ...
Facing a ROLAND G-70 tyros dutout does not hold water in terms of ergonomics.
I find the best arranger Introduced on roland well as on the tyros, the possibilities are much more gandes.
My BIGGEST regret is the abscence of "smart" mode, a function of the arranger for me is serious practice.
When the manual, drop ... I have a G-70 at home for 2 years and I have opened his textbook few times.
However, it can aprcier other things like singing, composing (pristine audio recording is very correct), carry it without much problem it is fragile (it was always the fear of scratching or break the screen ...), we can register our name and given name and to be displayed ds turning on the camera lol!
We have fun all the same well with tyros.

NOTICE GLOBAL

To conclude I would say I do not regret my choice, but between tyros and G-70, it would really weigh the pros and cons for the roland is a very very good machine, shame we do can regain the sounds of tyros above sniff !!!

All this to say that I am because I combl 2 watching me home h h

So for the sounds of the tyros 2: NOTHING TO SAY vrritablement, really sounds good and everything AND sonnorits characteristics of Gnrale fawn is frankly the GOOD.
malgrs the fact that it is composed of 61 keys that I put 10/10 without hsiter.

USE

For parcontre use the ...
Facing a ROLAND G-70 tyros dutout does not hold water in terms of ergonomics.
I find the best arranger Introduced on roland well as on the tyros, the possibilities are much more gandes.
My BIGGEST regret is the abscence of "smart" mode, a function of the arranger for me is serious practice.
When the manual, drop ... I have a G-70 at home for 2 years and I have opened his textbook few times.
However, it can aprcier other things like singing, composing (pristine audio recording is very correct), carry it without much problem it is fragile (it was always the fear of scratching or break the screen ...), we can register our name and given name and to be displayed ds turning on the camera lol!
We have fun all the same well with tyros.

NOTICE GLOBAL

To conclude I would say I do not regret my choice, but between tyros and G-70, it would really weigh the pros and cons for the roland is a very very good machine, shame we do can regain the sounds of tyros above sniff !!!

All this to say that I am because I combl 2 watching me home h h

Updating my previous post - I now have my Tyros 2 for 1 month.
Reminder: Before I had a PSR8000.

I confirm the incredible sound quality but beware, the default settings of the device include a lot of reverb and chorus. Off when all these effects, falls a little enthusiasm. I wonder how the outcome will be when I start mixing with seriously: ie when I start transferring the audio track by track in Cubase. With all these effects, I'm afraid phase shifts.
In this regard, the MIDI settings seem to me very complex ... Finally, it will be a second post.

Guitars and drum kit are extraordinary. The pianos are very good but not great. The electric pianos are fa-bu-lous! Multi Pads are great and numerous. But in practice, it is still missing after all.

The micro level is really impressive: the default settings are beautiful, it's a pleasure to sing 'in it' - a must! For cons, the harmonizer is NULL, only one program can be used: the unison mode. All others are kitsch and robotics at will, without musicality. It is a real regression in relation to psr8000, which offered at least the effects of vocoder of very good quality if not to offer beautiful harmonies. As against the mode pitch correction is efficient and discreet.

attention: the audio on HD is not multi-track, which greatly limits its interest (a kind of luxury which dictaphone). That's all to reach a binz copy a song recorded on a USB key and only the WAV mode is supported. Wide plan for your USB key! But it is good practice anyway, and it can record a quick idea of ​​melody without turning on the PC.

UTILIZATION

The strength of this instrument, and the reason that made me choose from the G70: Entering into agreements step mode. For those (like me) who do not play well is the ability to create very easily again, reading chord names on the score or tablature. On the tyros 2, all agreements are expected, even those with a '/' (that means with a different bass I think) is really the top. For example, I could record the song "You have been loved" by Michael G. - one piece at a complex structure and jazzy that I had never been able to reproduce on any of my previous arrangers!

I will send you a link to my MP3 demos on request.

The large black dot: the arranger. Again, big regression in relation to who owned the PSR8000 mode intelligent arranger 'which brought some humanity to the patterns. Here, none of this, the styles are very beautiful and numerous, but repetitive and boring as the song than a minute. No change or steady progression after alternating major / minor as I had such on my old Roland. Listening to: this net is a robot playing and nobody is fooled. Big big disappointment ...

As for the connection to the PC is unusable. I think other software will emerge to exploit all the possibilities really.

For cons, the direct connection to internet is stirring. With a USB wifi (offered) I go directly to the internet (through my freebox) from the screen of Tyros, without turning on the PC. You can download styles, songs, lessons to learn to play ... it is very easy to use. on the other hand, there's quite a few styles to buy (average 5 euros) and I feel they are very 'types' - for example I downloaded 90powerballad (or something like that) and quelquesoit chords played, it looks like death Bryan Adams (Robin Hood) - it's funny (but is it useful?) on the other hand, this style uses electric guitars beautifully: it is believed.

I have not tried the sampler, but I'm looking forward to!

OVERALL OPINION

Very expensive (3800 euros in this case), I almost regret ...
But the sounds are beautiful, and there are lots of nice features, it's a very fun instrument, I spent hours having fun on it ... it makes you want to learn to play to replace the deficiencies of the arranger who is not up to the rest, unfortunately.

About the G70 and Pa1X: In Valencia, the "music box" where I bought my Tyros, they had the 3 demo side by side: royal to compare.
I found the Pa1X Veillot and completely obsolete: that train! but the sounds are good. The editing step is but the ergonomics are so awful about this function that makes it unusable.
The G70: super compact but very beautiful and very pro, but at first mainly dedicated to the 'live'. The step recording agreements does not exist (just note by note). Piano sounds are very beautiful, but the guitars I prefer the tyros. It seemed that the arranger of the G70 was much more nuanced, human, musical short. But I'm not good enough to use such a thing.

Tyros 2: superb, I've had it yesterday and it's a great day for me that goes to the Tyros2 PSR9000!
I enjoy the moment and I discovered, after I get down to business ...

UTILIZATION

For the manual, it is not so much easier to operate than the PSR9000, but hey it's still useable
for editing sounds I do not know yet!
but the keys light I think it's great practice on stage, on screen is really great;
there are plenty of features available in ESP directly contraitement where to go and look in the menu, which on stage is not always clear
I am giving my opinion in a few weeks and after a first baluchi ...

OVERALL OPINION

I'm using it since yesterday;
what I like most is the realism of the sounds
the value is good in my opinion
in terms of experience, I have nothing more to say!
I think I'll still spend the night ......

While there, to the sounds of tyros 2: NOTHING TO SAY vérritablement, it sounds really good and everything sonnorités characteristics and, in general it's frankly good.
Despite the fact that it is composed of only 61 keys I put 10/10 without hesitation.

UTILIZATION

For use parcontre here ...
Faced with a ROLAND G-70 the tyros does not dutout the road in terms of ergonomics.
I find the best presented to the arranger roland well as on the tyros, the possibilities are much more Gander.
My biggest regret is the abscence of how "intelligent", according to an arranger for me is a serious practice.
When the manual, forget it ... I have a G-70 has been home for two years and I opened the manual only a few times.
However, it can therefore enjoy other things like singing, call (recording pristine audio is correct), transport it safely while it is still fragile (it was always the fear of scratching or breaking the screen .. .), we can put our full name to appear soon and the lighting of the camera lol!
Fun all the same well with a tyros.

OVERALL OPINION

In conclusion I would say that I do not regret my choice, but between a tyros and G-70, it should really weigh the pros and cons because the roland is a very good machine, too bad we can not find the sound top of tyros snif!

All that to say that I am overwhelmed because I have the two looking at me in my hey! hey!