All user reviews for the Studio Projects C1

See manufacturer's website ... condenser microphone comes with suspension ert briefcase ...

OVERALL OPINION

I tried it one weekend. This mic is trs prcis across the spectrum, but so precise in acute that it can easily become aggressive on certain types of voices (mine in this case ...). on the other hand, it's a good trs mic the drums and other instruments (we do not see the diffrence with a rode ntk or Tb1 in such uses) ... or even an excellent micro view of its price yours at the moment with virtually no competitor, it's € 230 on soundsense.co.uk.
Trs a good microphone to be a couple such stro ...

As mentioned above it is a vocal microphone (or other for that matter) made in China.
See manufacturer site for frequency curves and the rest.

OVERALL OPINION

A 9 is required. I own this mic for 3 months now coupled to an in-Mindprint voice and change from my SM58! The microphone is solid, very cheap and very well provide (classy carrying case, Bonet + suspension). The sound is so good that I have not seen fit to buy a TLM103! For cons I agree with the previous opinion: the sound can be a bit harsh in the treble. It will compensate in some cases with the equalizer.
Tip: do not miss out!

Micro cardode quite versatile.

OVERALL OPINION

I test for a week, and then compares a Rode NTK and a Rode NT-1000, and also an old Audio Technica 4033. This micro leaves me a little confused: I think it is capable of the best and the worst. At first I thought it was DGRAD as and when it is used. He prsence standards and heat: the spectrum is. But the next day, he had a sound that seems pasty Record in a pool. I have since made recordings and archive a RPTS same song, cte cte with the microphones mentioned above. All business and I think positioning and recording level. If the levels are correct (that is, plutt too strong), and the singer well positioned your exact and unique, which is the NTK or Exceeds more than twice as chr, and has far more characters than the NT-1000. But if, on some notes, there is a phasing effect or flange (when singing lgrement cot), but it's supper that's what gives it its heat. A note also, that takes much more than other ambient background noise: problmatiques So for that homestudistes enregsitrent ct a computer a little bit noisy (a G5 dual processor in my case, there are more noisy). The taking of a baby grand piano taient more than promising.
Try it in any state of the facts. Otherwise, k fall in love or not.

Micro vocals and instruments

OVERALL OPINION

J uses the microwave for 6 months.

j had previously tested the Rode NT2, Neuman U87 and AT 3035 under comparable conditions.
The definition captures the sound is in the high-end microphones, but the treble, although Submitted, can generate on Ceratina types of voices and some instruments. (Good for percussion but less for brass, for example)

report quality price is excellent considering the price of microphones that I've experienced before. This one cost me 370 euros book at home. (And it is far from my house is in Guadeloupe!)

recommended choice for the home studio to sound dsireux srieux but not 17,000 bullets (I know ... in euros) to 87 in a U (which incidentally justifies many guard) It quivaut how many months of qt, ca??

See data sheets

OVERALL OPINION

That's it my first static capacitor. I bought it to pr
take my acoustic guitar, which frankly can not silent
with monSm58. I had read that the good reviews on the net ... so go ...
I never had this kind of exp microphone, and must say it frankly
nothing to do with my SM58. Is a standard sensitivity: gain background I hear ts
the sounds of birds outside the house, the cars that pass!
Taking acoustic guitar is gniale: trs trs prcise, no need
of legalization, it shows tt on the mix, nothing short gnial!
The cot is 58 sm every time draft, without precision ...
The pb is that it also captures the reverb of a pice and pice
untreated bin it would spoil her a little

With this kind of mic, tt is in the placement ... should not aim
the rosette plutt but my left hand on the handle ... According to the placement 30/40cm
the sound changes of tt or tt! You have to go to bcp tps express.

In terms of voice, placing even more impact! PLutt s'exentrer
and leave the field: 40/50cm.

The sound is natural, and trs prcis Retailer, hot enough ... but I tjrs
rglages not found the right sound for voice I'm looking for.

In short a good trs microphone, I would do without the choice points. Trs is that good
critics on the net.

Condenser microphone versatile and cheap.
I bought a pair for 400 in Playback ...
I use them to track, acoustic instruments and overhead drum.
CHARACTERISTICS more than respectable for the price!

OVERALL OPINION

I use them for a week, and I am satisfied with my purchase trs.
J'hsitais between one or two C1 C3, and I am glad I opt for 2 C1 that allow me to more things. I plugged into my pramp Tfpro P2, and rings. His prcis trs, trs sensible and directivity. More than one micro 10X more expensive is its only default, but the price is well worth a test just over positioning! Book in his briefcase with a hanger. Of course, the quality of packaging is not gniale, but again, this price it will be the content widely. I recommend this mic everyone.

FEATURES:

Sensitive pressure transducer
Single capsule at 25 mm mylar layer with 6 microns
Cardioid polar structure
Construction trs sound
HPF
Attnuateur 10 dB

Accessories: Windscreen, elastic suspension and carrying case.

SPECIFICATIONS

Micro FET with a large single capsule of 25 mm and 6 microns
Polar structure: cardioid
Rponse in frquence: 20 20 000 Hz
Sensitivity: 14 mV / Pa = -37 dB (0 dB = 1 V / Pa).
Impdance output: <200 Ohms.
Impdance load:> 1000 Ohms.
Max SPL: 142 dB SPL for 1% THD 1000 Hz (0 dB = 0.00002 Pa).
Noise: (Line): 27 dB (A lay) 17 dB.
Signal / Noise: 79 dB.
Power supply: 48 V + / - 4 V.
Current consumption: <2.5 mA.
Circuit: free transformer, with a noise intrinsque extremely low and a high dynamic range trs.
Connector: 3 pin XLR gold plated
Size: Diameter = 53.35 mm, length = 226 mm
Weight: 762 grams

Not to an empty note CHARACTERISTICS for a microphone so we will put 8 / 10 as a single directivity.

OVERALL OPINION

It's going to be ending for one and a half I I use this microphone to record voice and acoustic guitar. It replaced my first condenser microphone, a Behringer B1 which quickly shows its limits even if c'tait trs good for beginners gently without breaking the bank.
The C1 was able to bring what I reproached my old Behringer is that it has the lev espce sail which drowns your catch in the softness. This mic is REALLY trs prcis and breathes. I find trsar and may be a little too much actually ... l for once I find a lack of heat but little APRS adpend qu'uon ​​this research. I find it a bit aggressive in the upper medium and if a can put forward a voice in the mix also makes a hair taken some aggressive guitar acoutique we will not fail to equalize.
I am happy with the trs microphone for the price, gives good rsultat. Today I am looking for something softer and warmer, but the Studio Projects C1 is a good value trs qualitprix!

See more reviews

Some comments:
- High Pass Filter "somewhat high" (120 dB)
- Cardiod only
- Complete equipment

OVERALL OPINION

I have been using PRS two years, I bought it for his report qualitprix.

This microphone is dynamic and incisive trs. Peak labeled prsence trs. It gives the impression of a sound recording trs closer, "in your face." Perfect to bring out a voice track.
It is quite difficult to use: a bit whimsical, it is sensitive to the TRS investment. It may be capable of the best and the worst. For better, you really take the time to tame.
Today I replaced by an AKG C414, but even when I keep ...
The AKG is much more soft and "silky" in comparison, easier to use. I am obliged to qualiser bcp to get the same "prsence" as C1.
I like the personality of the C1, I use it less now because of his cot capricious, and sometimes treble the ferry (a little "hard", sometimes lacks finesse).
No regrets: report quality price is excellent. Trs a good mic, but not a micro forcment for beginners. A couple with pramp. who in the sweetness.

This is a large diaphragm condenser mic with a cardioid pattern. From the way I understand it, it is an American designed, Chinese copy of a Neumann large diaphragm condensor, like the U87 at less than 10% of the cost. This mic has a roll offs at 75 and 150 hz, as well as a -10 or -20 pad. Of course, it can use the standard flat response or no pad. It also came with a shockmount. I give it a perfect rating for characteristics, because although it is lacking the ability to change the mic pattern, the C3 has this ability, meaning that the C1 is available for cheaper. The pads and the roll off frequencies are very handy to have, for those who are lacking mixers with these options.

OVERALL OPINION

I've never been fortunate enough to have worked with a U87, but I can tell you this is the best microphone in my arsenal. It is very quiet, extremely accurate, and has a very smooth, full quality to it. I first purchased the Studio Projects B3, which is also a very versatile mic, but this one blows the B3 (or the B1 for that matter) out of the water. It's my #1 lead vocal mic, but I have also used it to mic a 15 inch bass guitar cab, which captured all of the lows and gave a nice punch. It also sounds wonderful on acoustic guitar. For the money, I've thought about purchasing a second one to use as drum overheads, but it's not in the budget right now. I give it a 9 for a rating because I have heard (and once experienced) a quality control issue on a Studio Project microphone. Fortunately, SP was very good about exchanging that mic for a replacement, even though it was out of warranty.

The Studio Projects C1 is a condenser microphone made for use in the recording studio. It has a cardioid polar pattern and it also has an XLR microphone cable output. Like a lot of cheap microphones these days, the C1 comes from China and is the same microphone that a few companies are putting out under different names. This is what makes this microphone so cheap and so affordable for home studio owners.

OVERALL OPINION

I've been using the Studio Projects C1 Studio Condenser microphone for about a year. While it isn't the best sounding microphone in the world by far, it sounds good and is usable. The tone quality is full, but sometimes lacks the full range of frequencies in certain situations. This being said, it works fine in most situations and is perfect for the small home studio owner. In fact, I'd only recommend it to the home or project studio owner as there are much better professional microphone choices out there for professional studios. The best part about the C1 is its extremely cheap price. You can get one of the C1s for about $200 USD new, which would have been unheard of about ten years ago. These microphones are made and shipped from China, which makes them so cheap. The C1 is good for a number of different applications, but won't blow you away while doing any of them. I like using the Studio Projects C1 for recording vocals, horns, and anything else a large diaphragm condenser would be useful for. While I'd rather use any Neumann microphone over this for recording anything, if you are on a budget and can't afford a high end microphone, the Studios Projects C1 is a great substitution. I definitely recommend this microphone for home studio owners looking for a cheap condenser microphone to add to their collection.