All user reviews for the The T.bone SC400

Already detailed below. I do not the remake.

OVERALL OPINION

For more than six months. I had a succession Samson C01 (gadget), an Oktava MK319 (never managed to draw the very substance) and the T-Bone SC400.
Considering the price, the quality is unbeatable. The votes are taken rather clear and balanced if you equip it with a pop filter. Obviously, the management of distance mouth / micro cotton is a bit to adjust (it saturates quickly) but I guess the pre-amplification for many plays (in this case the Behringer UB802 mixer for me, it does better side amplification micro ...).
A € 59 with our friends Teutons, no reason to deprive yourself. Unless you prefer the SC450 or SC600 that look really good too.
Of course, this is not a Neumann U47, but the price is 10 times lower as well. So in quality / price ratio, for home-studio demos and unpretentious, a great choice.

The SC400 is a transistor condenser microphone, hypercardioid.

I use it to catch voice, acoustic guitar, amp and transplanted ... tambourine.

I would not put a note in it is a condenser microphone which ^ ^

Oh look, if I have to note. Bon bah I put the same notes that while overall opinion.

OVERALL OPINION

- I use it for several months. Gender, uh ... 8 months.

I am not in trs cal condenser microphone. I often use the SM 58, 57 less often, least often stuff that I know how a name is not even in any case everything is dynamic microphones.
And I use it with the card M-Audio Solo, so that the pramp gnial must not be, but I know anything about that kind of stuff. Brefle.

Ngatifs points first:
- It's probably more pramp the microphone, but saturates quickly. With the same level as a minimum on the card, the microphone saturates every stroke of the drum, and I have to my place quite far from it. However, even if a sometimes saturates the rcoute was no big CLIC and it coutable.
Fortunately this problem does not appear for the taking of other instruments.
So for the guitar (electric or acoustic) no such problem as it is for voice and rgl (knowing that I do not even anti-pop - I m make it a with bits of sticky), it must grate distance mouth / microphone according to the song (mine is not homogne, sometimes I cry sometimes it's normal, and often when I cries without a few m'loigner centimtres a saturated).
As you will understand I am not a pro veneer condenser microphone (although the tutorial site that made me express neat stuff) and another default that I will give the microphone is little lack of bass. It's still "touch" with EQ.
Finally, there is a low-cut indoor the microphone (you must dvisser the chassis to enable it), and I find it a little pointless. M'enfin.

Pros:
- First course: THE PRICE.
Deuxime in place despite my lack of experience: the limpid clarity of the sound.
The microphone does not breath even with a big win, the clamp holds it (I read below the micro slip but ... well not: p)
Trs plugs are used, the sound for the voice is really good trs. Like McDonald's, "I'm loving it" ^ ^
As it is a condenser microphone, you have to place the microphone for sound cool on an acoustic amp for the transplanted. Anyway today, I always t satisfied with the sc400. And even better: ds I find that the sound does not have enough scale, I use a compressor VST good quality and it's magic. I just do not need a better sound. Hallelujah sc400. And I never n'exagre.

With exprience ... Difficult to say. There's lots of static cheap and I know none, except this one now. But must say that, even among the lowest prices, a static 59 it's hard to find.
So in conclusion, with the exprience, well ... I have enough for our answer.

What kind of microphone? Transistor condenser microphone
What technology? Capacitor

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a month now, and I am satisfied with TRS. I used the amp for transplant, to record an acoustic guitar, made to make voice and made snare. The quality of sound is surprising for a microphone that price, I did not tell him yet to find faults. I got it for 59 euros with the elastic suspension and pop filter (both trs good quality!) Thomann: report qualitprix unbeatable. If I had the same little prs budget, I think I'll try a micro of the same brand, but a little more expensive. I put 10/10 as this mic is really impressive for its price!

You are already aware ...

OVERALL OPINION

Use today for the first time.
It is small, but size has never been quality. Button included in the body of the microphone is not very accessible, but it seems that I never use. Too bad a hard plastic box is not included, it would have been the top. Just a leatherette kit (Shure way). So nothing to lug around the frame ...
Tried a Rode (the NT1 I think, not sure). Apart from the size and finish not hear any difference really noticeable.
Incredible value for money. I'm not sure what brings more in terms of quality of the SC450 and SC600 else (apart from the button more accessible, and the multiple directional). No breath, his voice neutral (that's good is what I want), not especially wheezing. A small flat on the finish: painting the body and the grid is not nickel: it shows that it is fast and "cheap". But it is detail, and for the price ...
I would do this chosen without hesitation, especially as I think of the group records with a couple of microphones for stereo

Condenser microphone condenser distributed by thomann at a ridiculous price ....

I put 10 good but ca not mean much

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a year.

For the price its a very utilisale on vocals (a little hissing so it must work placement).

I tried a lot of static micro. There was an excellent value for money. To start with it's super cheap. After must not dream, it is better but more expensive. Nevertheless, for voice and acoustic instrumentals it is really usable.

The downside: does not support high intensity ... For example, it has trouble with a paper clip or even a trumpet ... it's not really away for that saturates (this is not a problem at the preamp, but it is the microphone that distrod the sound too loud). Solution ... remove the paper clip in more than one meter masi This involves having a sound in the room miking that allows it.

I would do this choice at that price for use in home studio. But by remaining objective, it does not completely replace a micro four times more expensive ... That's why I do not put 10

Small micro-level of static, trs cheap (58) transistor technology, dirrectivit cardio, low-cut accessible disassemble the bolt (so so anyway, but I ais never had the usefulness)
Book with fixing of proper quality, and icing on the cake is made with a antipop Buddle for the same price, what else ...

OVERALL OPINION

made about a year I use it exclusively in the studio, to use voice and acoustic guitar.
For voice rendering is trs good, especially for the price, but I found it when even a lack of warmth and lightweight low, nothing too mchant finally, a stroke of the compressor and to EQ and the sound is perfectly fine
I love the acoustic guitar, I do not know why but the sound is really hot and pleind, a true happiness.

BMOL by a cons, it does not cash the acoustic pressures trs, I try to use it as a room mic for transplanting a guitar amp (20Watt, pushed back) and m me with the gain of prampli 0 (map allesis IO2) was saturated and I have to rev the microphone moves away from my amp losing heavily by the same occasion the whole vicinity and PCHE Sound ... This will require that I find another microphone, a pad for such use ...

But what little income I would do without this choice hsiter, I never really had to t with my purchase

I've had it three months.
I also tried a Shure 300 euro's all
what I like is that it is a micro exellent for the price I have not tried that on voice, spoken or sung, and it is really great. of course there are better but for the price, it's champion!
before the sound card, I have a tube preamp art nickel.je 38 euros and it intends to change the lamp for a little more heat.
The report will money; Thomann 58.00 euros with the pop up is the top. to be honest, I had to 150.00 euros with the microphone, pop up, preamp, the foot and external sound card swissonic which also is great and Jack's qualitée.avec of this, I have a small studio enough for me. course is quality amateur but I promise you that it still does.
with experience. bin to be honest right now I buy a t bone sct 700 to light that I intend to change thanks to the great explanation of the topic on this site for a good tube microphone.
oh did about the SC 400 I bought a second-hand or I just needed to tighten the capsule so I remake the experience of that choice issue as stated.

Large-diaphragm cardioid condenser.
low-cut filter 6 dB at 100Hz
frequency response 30 Hz - 20 kHz
48V phantom power

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for almost a year and I'm happy. It is a good product for recording voices and guitars. However much he captures the sound environment of the room or to register, I advise you to soundproof a corner of your room to avoid being too intrusive a reverb in your recording. For my part a few egg dishes are enough to isolate the sound. I therefore recommend this product to begin the recording with a low budget.
With the experience I turned this into a product of more advanced such as AKG or Shure because I search a more péchus and more versatile.